Human element - manual vs automated announcements on trains.

AlphaHotel

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2020
Messages
21
Location
birmingham
Just sat on a 323 that was renovated to have the PIS which gives the next stop and approaching the station, I had a great conductor who announced the stops as well as extra information. For example, Aston where the line splits off to Walsall.

with the automated announcements now on trains is it a conductors choice to do announcements as most of the time they leave it to the PIS. And do you feel its important to have the human element of imput for passengers?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
1 Sep 2018
Messages
135
Location
Malvern Link
Just sat on a 323 that was renovated to have the PIS which gives the next stop and approaching the station, I had a great conductor who announced the stops as well as extra information. For example, Aston where the line splits off to Walsall.

with the automated announcements now on trains is it a conductors choice to do announcements as most of the time they leave it to the PIS. And do you feel its important to have the human element of imput for passengers?
On my line (Hereford - New Street) The guard makes all of the announcements if the train is formed of the quickly diminishing class 170 fleet. However on the Class 172's that have been drafted in temporarily (172/0, 172/2, 172/3) the announcement is made automatically of the next station and a new 'safe travel' announcement. Whether the 172/1's that have just transferred from Chiltern will have the guard doing the PA as the PIS will not cover the HFD - BHM route is yet to be seen.
 

jh1989

Member
Joined
6 Jun 2019
Messages
7
TrainFX automated announcements can be good, but are rarely perfect! With plenty of our units, it doesn't announce anything on the approach, but will blurt out "THIS IS XXXXX" once the doors open. When it does announce on the approach, at times it can be far too early. It also doesn't secify where there is a particular gap/step/lean when leaving the train.

I tent to use it as an aid to help me in my duties, and absolutely not as a replacement for my input
 

king_walnut

Member
Joined
16 Oct 2013
Messages
188
In my opinion, if the automated PA is announcing the next stations then it's silly to then repeat that every time. However, human input is always a good thing when initially departing, when arriving at an interchange station, and before the train terminates.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
65,498
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Just sat on a 323 that was renovated to have the PIS which gives the next stop and approaching the station, I had a great conductor who announced the stops as well as extra information. For example, Aston where the line splits off to Walsall.

with the automated announcements now on trains is it a conductors choice to do announcements as most of the time they leave it to the PIS. And do you feel its important to have the human element of imput for passengers?

What I find grossly annoying is staff talking over the automatic announcements (unless they are wrong or faulty somehow) with basically the same thing but usually not as clear. Let it run, then if you want to introduce yourself and your dog or announce connections or whatever, do it then.
 

Sprinter153

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2014
Messages
434
Location
In the TGS
To a point, I think most passengers appreciate the human touch as long as the tone is right - not too ‘wacky’ because it’s rarely amusing, and not too aggressive (threats of penalty fares and six years in a gulag if you have a Northern Only ticket or sit in an aisle seat).
 

Ashley Hill

Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
1,034
Location
The West Country
I usually let the auto announcer do her thing but sometimes there are things to be said which she cannot cope with. Also I reinforce her announcements if I have a reason to e.g. an early announcement if I believe it will help certain passengers.
There's a recent thread on here about announcements.
 

WestRiding

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2012
Messages
691
Location
Yorkshire
One or the Other. A stipulation of manual announcements should be that the user can actually string a sentence together, and without waffle. Example, Cross Country the other day, went something like this; please follow the covid guidelines.......... because well.......... it helps myself......... and others to maintain........ erm..... social distancing. masks are also....... erm....... mandatory, if you choose not to wear one.......... well erm.... erm, thats your choice. This was all the way from Newcastle to Wakefield, along with other waffle. In this case, the human element was most unwelcome. The guard from Edinburgh was spot on, and didnt feel the need to shout either, where as the new one from Newcastle, shouted and screeched down the tannoy. Totally un-acceptable.
 

al78

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2013
Messages
1,836
It is good to have the human element of input when the tannoy is talking gibberish, like announcing the next station that doesn't exist on this line. I can only think that sometimes trains are moved from one route to a completely different one but the automated announcements are not updated (properly).
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
1,891
Location
London
Its a mixture. I feel the human voice should complement, not overrule the PA (unless its giving out gibberish).
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
3,742
Location
Northern England
Automated PIS is something which is a fundamentally excellent idea, but which hardly any operators in this country seem to get right. One gripe I have is that TrainFX is possibly the buggiest system I've ever had to interact with as a railway passenger. Often it seems that it either announces something incorrect, or nothing at all. Also Northern in particular don't seem bothered to set it up properly - plenty of spurious spaces and punctuation. Additionally the actual hardware is bad - the majority of units have horrid flickery dot matrix displays, and the few that have modern LCD displays just show the same as the dot matrices, but horribly formatted.

The other issue is that TOCs can't seem to resist diluting the useful information they have the potential to provide by stuffng them with irrelevant waffle. There is one TOC where it's reasonably common on a short stop for the PIS not to finish its spiel at all, with it ultimately being interrupted by the next-station announcement on departure.

But human announcements are not without their flaws either. @WestRiding is correct that some are far too waffly - additionally some staff don't seem to know how to use a microphone; they either put their mouth too far from it making the announcement inaudible, or shout into it causing distortion. And nothing is more irritating than duplication or interruption of the automated announcements.

My personal preference would be:
  • Basic automated announcements, which are responsible only for providing details about the service and calling pattern (i.e. "This station is Stafford. This is the 15:40 London Midland service to Liverpool Lime Street. The next station is Crewe.")
  • Several high-quality displays in each carriage showing the next few stops with live running information - all generic information such as unattended baggage should be relegated to posters or decals
  • Conductors properly trained in how to make good quality passenger announcements, but not to do so unless the automated system does not work properly (in which case it should be muted or switched off) or unless they are providing additional information (such as connecting services)

Its a mixture. I feel the human voice should complement, not overrule the PA (unless its giving out gibberish).
If the PIS is giving out gibberish then it should be turned off, and in my opinion any such system which does not allow the staff to turn it off should not be considered fit for purpose.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
1,891
Location
London
If the PIS is giving out gibberish then it should be turned off, and in my opinion any such system which does not allow the staff to turn it off should not be considered fit for purpose.

Previously I've been unable to switch it off, but at the same time, it rarely gave out gibberish so it was just complementary announcements I made.
 

Mcq

Member
Joined
24 May 2019
Messages
274
Many years ago when the Hertford loop only took passengers as far as Hertford North - the voice over on that service had the most wonderful deep Hertfordshire accent.
I couldn't wait for the next announcement - he seemed to be on every traIn I came home on - so there must of been several of them - miss that.
 

jh1989

Member
Joined
6 Jun 2019
Messages
7
So You'd still announce over the PA system regardless?
No, not regardless, but I will if I know it's not announcing before we stop on the platform, or not functioning properly in any other way.

Too many think that once TrainFX is set, that's it... it must be working, so it's not my job to announce anything.
 

Bigman

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2011
Messages
177
Location
Leeds
I once got on a 150 at Lancaster heading to Leeds. When the conductor had completed the stopping list, he reiterated that the train stops at Long Preston, not Preston and that anyone on the train wanting to go to Preston was on the wrong train. Nice touch.
 
Joined
23 Jan 2013
Messages
127
Location
Eccles Signal Box
On Siemens Desiro units, manual PA announcements can be made at any time when there is power, but the automated announcements/PIS screens are only operational when the driver's key is in. The initial welcome message plays once when the driver puts their key in.

So at a terminus, if passengers are boarding before the driver has arrived, it's worth making a manual announcement to make sure people are on the right train. Similarly if people board after the driver, they won't have heard the message so another is useful.

It also means if there is a driver change mid-route, all the screens go off then it starts again when the new driver takes over.
 

PennineSuperb

Member
Joined
8 Jun 2018
Messages
87
On Siemens Desiro units, manual PA announcements can be made at any time when there is power, but the automated announcements/PIS screens are only operational when the driver's key is in. The initial welcome message plays once when the driver puts their key in.

So at a terminus, if passengers are boarding before the driver has arrived, it's worth making a manual announcement to make sure people are on the right train. Similarly if people board after the driver, they won't have heard the message so another is useful.

It also means if there is a driver change mid-route, all the screens go off then it starts again when the new driver takes over.
Thats interesting, which Desiro sets are these?

On the Class 185's automatic announcements can announced with/without a Drivers Key in.
The Headcode needs to be inputted into the HMI however, but this can be done by a Driver or Conductor. There is also a list of 'Emergency' or 'Get Me Home' inputs availabile for exterior destination indicators.
 

setdown

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
99
On my journeys with London Northwestern, the guard tends to make a manual announcement departing the first station, and then leaves it to auto for the rest of the journey. Which I think is the best way to do it! Lets people know there's staff on board.

(One odd experience was travelling on a Birmingham-bound train leaving Liverpool once, and the auto announcements were stuck in reverse. It thought the train was still on a journey into Liverpool, so after leaving each station, it announced that "we're now approaching X" where X was the station we'd just left! There were no manual announcements then, which would have been very handy for clearing up the confusion!)
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
4,157
Location
Some part of Yorkshire
Had the emergency brakes slammed on on the train I’m on, in Morley tunnel. Sat in there for roughly 10-15 minutes. No announcement, no asking if everyone was okay. Pretty poor IMO.
 

lxfe_mxtterz

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2018
Messages
422
Location
Horse Stables
Much prefer automated announcements as they are often good, clear and straightforward - if working correctly, that is. (Bakerloo Line excluded - often wonder why they bother with the announcements as they're impossible to hear most of the time!)

I do appreciate a human voice, especially if travelling on an empty train alone and at night, however - if I can actually understand what is being said. Unfortunately, from my experience, 9 times out of 10, the "guard's announcement" is nothing more than a low, indecipherable mumble above the drone of the engine.

I find having both on the same journey is often overkill - should be one or the other (with a personal preference for automated), unless, of course, there is something important to be said which cannot be announced using the automated system, e.g. information regarding a delay or a diversion.
 

Robert Pow

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2020
Messages
228
Location
Worcestershire
On my line (Hereford - New Street) The guard makes all of the announcements if the train is formed of the quickly diminishing class 170 fleet. However on the Class 172's that have been drafted in temporarily (172/0, 172/2, 172/3) the announcement is made automatically of the next station and a new 'safe travel' announcement. Whether the 172/1's that have just transferred from Chiltern will have the guard doing the PA as the PIS will not cover the HFD - BHM route is yet to be seen.
Had this exact situation the other day. The guard announced all the stops for a 170 but on the other times I travelled on the 172 they didn't say a word.

Also some announcements by guards are useless. Having travelled on a loud turbo the announcements are crackly quiet drones I can't make out one word of. The 170s are also a little quiet but still decipherable
 

Top