I stick by what I say. If this were to be tested in the courts, I'm confident VTEC would win.
My analogy was also entirely valid. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean there is a "lack of understanding".
The VTEC T&Cs state that at times there might not be any food available.
https://www.virgintrainseastcoast.c...nce/first-class/complimentary-food-and-drink/
Near the bottom:
That's no different to the time-restriction T&Cs on Railcards - hidden away from the draw-you-in headline, but place conditions on your purchase.
EDIT: in fact, compared to some T&Cs, those are actually quite large and visible.
My analogy was also entirely valid. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean there is a "lack of understanding".
The VTEC T&Cs state that at times there might not be any food available.
https://www.virgintrainseastcoast.c...nce/first-class/complimentary-food-and-drink/
Near the bottom:
Our menu pages aim to give you an idea of what’s available, but occasionally we may have to offer you a different selection, and on very rare occasions, we may not have any complimentary food and drink available in First Class.
That's no different to the time-restriction T&Cs on Railcards - hidden away from the draw-you-in headline, but place conditions on your purchase.
EDIT: in fact, compared to some T&Cs, those are actually quite large and visible.
Last edited: