• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

London Transport Traction Group; Project 483

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,435
Isn't the issue in part due to the trains? I remember an account being added to the "Future of the Island line" on this forum regarding lateral movement of the bogies, and the need to damp them. The train is running fine, then suddenly a graunching noise, and the carriage sways.
It's a comically rough ride, particularly between Sandown and Ryde. Mainly up and down, I only noticed a lot of sway on one section. That said I think a lot of the "bounciness" comes from the sprung seats. If you stand up everyone is bouncing up and down but as a standee it's nowhere near as hard to stay upright as it looks.
Best part is mile after mile of jointed track!
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,435
I personally feel that heritage railway electrification is, sadly, but a dream currently. Hopefully that may change in the future.

For a relatively lightweight unit such as a 483 we feel that accommodating batteries in the first seating bay behind the 'D' end car's cab (The D end is the one which has the compressor on it), sealing this off as a battery compartment. In order to create a degree of separation between this compartment and the public we envisage that there would be a second partition after the first set of doors to create a van area. If it makes it any easier to visualise, the basic layout wouldn't be dissimilar to one of the BR 'Thumper' DMs - Cab, then the 'power' bit, then a van and finally the passenger space.
Have you considered putting the batteries in a trailer? Perhaps one mocked up to look like a car? I think the batteries and associated kit are going to take up far more space than you imagine, and it will kind of ruin the D end car too. Can the unit take the weight of the batteries, especially concentrated in one area?
I was peripherally involved with the restoration and operation of a 1913 Siemens electric locomotive over 20 years ago. In that case we restored a contemporaneous coal waggon which held the batteries, and was semi-permanently coupled to the loco. Worked really well and looked right too.
 

lttgroup

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2020
Messages
68
Location
Multiple locations across former NSE territory!
That's Harton E4, I assume? Very nice job on her too!

We received the dimensions of the battery unit today; 800mm (Height) × 2000mm × 2000mm so easily able to be contained in the front end of the car, especially if that's then divided into two battery units. It even fits below window level, too, which means the external appearance ought to remain unaltered.
 

Peter C

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2018
Messages
4,514
Location
GWR land
We received the dimensions of the battery unit today; 800mm (Height) × 2000mm × 2000mm so easily able to be contained in the front end of the car, especially if that's then divided into two battery units. It even fits below window level, too, which means the external appearance ought to remain unaltered.
Sounds promising. I just wonder if having a large battery in the one cab will make operating the unit a bit difficult? Or have I missed something there?

-Peter
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,435
That's Harton E4, I assume? Very nice job on her too!

We received the dimensions of the battery unit today; 800mm (Height) × 2000mm × 2000mm so easily able to be contained in the front end of the car, especially if that's then divided into two battery units. It even fits below window level, too, which means the external appearance ought to remain unaltered.
Yes Harton E4.
I'm forgetting battery technology will have come on in the intervening two decades! That's still going to weight a couple of tonnes at least isn't it?
 

Peter C

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2018
Messages
4,514
Location
GWR land
The batteries won't be in the cab, instead taking up the leading part of the passenger saloon, over the bogie. Obviously this will have implications for weight distribution and we are currently looking to address those.
Ah OK. That makes more sense :)

-Peter
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,435
The batteries won't be in the cab, instead taking up the leading part of the passenger saloon, over the bogie. Obviously this will have implications for weight distribution and we are currently looking to address those.
What about distributing the batteries throughout the train? You could put packs of cells under the seat, for example?
 

lttgroup

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2020
Messages
68
Location
Multiple locations across former NSE territory!
Given the high voltage involved, the slim potential fire hazard, and the fact that there is already other stuff under some seats we deemed it to be safer and more practical to create a dedicated battery compartment, separated from the passenger compartment with its own access. This will also make maintenance easier and potentially also make failures in service easier to deal with.
 

lttgroup

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2020
Messages
68
Location
Multiple locations across former NSE territory!
I should add the caveat, however, that all of this is subject to change at this early stage. Working with our likely supplier we might even be able to find a solution that allows the batteries to be located below floor level. At this stage, however, we feel that may be too ambitious.
 

lttgroup

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2020
Messages
68
Location
Multiple locations across former NSE territory!
With class 483 withdrawals a little over a month away, the London Transport Traction Group are delighted to announce that this evening we were officially informed by South Western Railway that we have successfully secured a Class 483 unit for preservation. A representative from South Western Railway told us;

"I can confirm that you will have a unit for preservation. I can’t confirm which unit yet as the preservation committee have not given me a final answer but it is highly likely to be 483006 and if it is not then it will be 483008 (both of which are currently operational and in service).

In terms of timing – I expect we will be in a position to release the unit for collection around the end of the line closure in March.
"

This is truly wonderful news, but also represents only the first step in our journey that we hope will soon see a class 483 unit, cosmetically restored to London Transport condition, running on the Epping Ongar Railway under its own power and visiting galas around the country, taking a tube train where none has ever gone before and introducing the joy of the '38 stock to new audiences.

To do this we require your help. Our pledge scheme has been very successful, but we still require support. Earlier this week we opened up membership and donation options, which may be found on our website - www.lttractiongroup.co.uk

Although these are difficult times for many, we would greatly appreciate any assistance that you may be able to offer to our exciting and innovative project that has the potential to lead the way in electric railway preservation.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me by email; [email protected]
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
I'd like to see this project raising the profile of EMU preservation, because if battery operation is proven feasible, there's potentially quite a few EMUs out there that could once again run under their own power on heritage railways.
 

reddragon

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2016
Messages
3,145
Location
Churn (closed)
I'd like to see this project raising the profile of EMU preservation, because if battery operation is proven feasible, there's potentially quite a few EMUs out there that could once again run under their own power on heritage railways.

There already is no reason why a battery class 419, a Class 33 or 73 couldn't already operate a Southern unit today!
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
There already is no reason why a battery class 419, a Class 33 or 73 couldn't already operate a Southern unit today!

I'd love to see the 2-BIL run solo. That could be done quite easily with battery technology.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,162
I'd like to see this project raising the profile of EMU preservation, because if battery operation is proven feasible, there's potentially quite a few EMUs out there that could once again run under their own power on heritage railways.
A 769 is the obvious “EMU” preservation project when the time comes - ready fitted with a power supply.
 

Mothball

Member
Joined
26 Nov 2018
Messages
142
Fantastic news! I see a lot of comments essentially saying " There is already a 38 stock preserved operationally, dont need another" But i couldn't disagree more. If the ambition of battery operation is achieved, not only would it be a big step for EMU preservation as mentioned, but will potentially allow people like me, fascinated in the Underground and its stock but who rarely make it down to London/The island the chance to sample the unit should it be loaned to railways further north.
I would like to see it kept in Island condition, with the operational 1938 stock representing original condition, it would be nice to see the 483 in either "as withdrawn" condition or even NSE.
 

Tony2

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2019
Messages
397
With class 483 withdrawals a little over a month away, the London Transport Traction Group are delighted to announce that this evening we were officially informed by South Western Railway that we have successfully secured a Class 483 unit for preservation. A representative from South Western Railway told us;

"I can confirm that you will have a unit for preservation. I can’t confirm which unit yet as the preservation committee have not given me a final answer but it is highly likely to be 483006 and if it is not then it will be 483008 (both of which are currently operational and in service).

In terms of timing – I expect we will be in a position to release the unit for collection around the end of the line closure in March.
"

This is truly wonderful news, but also represents only the first step in our journey that we hope will soon see a class 483 unit, cosmetically restored to London Transport condition, running on the Epping Ongar Railway under its own power and visiting galas around the country, taking a tube train where none has ever gone before and introducing the joy of the '38 stock to new audiences.

To do this we require your help. Our pledge scheme has been very successful, but we still require support. Earlier this week we opened up membership and donation options, which may be found on our website - www.lttractiongroup.co.uk

Although these are difficult times for many, we would greatly appreciate any assistance that you may be able to offer to our exciting and innovative project that has the potential to lead the way in electric railway preservation.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me by email; [email protected]
That's fantastic news, I had what I thought would be my last runs on both 006 and 008 last year. These were particularly bouncy and memorable trips! It's good to know that one of these will still be around in the future. Best of luck with the project.
 

45669

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2010
Messages
1,028
Location
Farnborough.
The 1938 stock has always been bouncy. Back in the early 1960s, I used to commute into London on the Piccadilly Line which, at that time, used mostly the pre'36 Standard Stock. However, there were a handful of '38 stock trains on the Piccadilly and when one of those hove into view I knew that it would be more difficult to read my book or magazine than when riding in the more usual Standard Stock. If I hadn't been late for work already, I'd have waited for the next train!

The riding seemed to improve as we got nearer to London though, as the extra weight of additional passengers joining the train at the various stations en route made it steadier.
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,905
Sadly 006 has given up the ghost today, not a simple fault to fix I understand. 008 holding the fort on the island.
 

Jozhua

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2019
Messages
1,856
Hate to say it........ So the "exciting" announcement was you're in negotiations to take a train you haven't got yet to a railway you haven't got an agreed deal with yet.

Piece of advice: announce something when you have something definite to announce, and don't trail it in advance, even less so as "big news" or "exciting". Don't feel the need to make announcements during a negotiation process - only the relevant people need to know where the negotiations are at and who they are with.
Hate to say it...but no-one's forcing you to read this :p
With class 483 withdrawals a little over a month away, the London Transport Traction Group are delighted to announce that this evening we were officially informed by South Western Railway that we have successfully secured a Class 483 unit for preservation. A representative from South Western Railway told us;

"I can confirm that you will have a unit for preservation. I can’t confirm which unit yet as the preservation committee have not given me a final answer but it is highly likely to be 483006 and if it is not then it will be 483008 (both of which are currently operational and in service).

In terms of timing – I expect we will be in a position to release the unit for collection around the end of the line closure in March.
"

This is truly wonderful news, but also represents only the first step in our journey that we hope will soon see a class 483 unit, cosmetically restored to London Transport condition, running on the Epping Ongar Railway under its own power and visiting galas around the country, taking a tube train where none has ever gone before and introducing the joy of the '38 stock to new audiences.

To do this we require your help. Our pledge scheme has been very successful, but we still require support. Earlier this week we opened up membership and donation options, which may be found on our website - www.lttractiongroup.co.uk

Although these are difficult times for many, we would greatly appreciate any assistance that you may be able to offer to our exciting and innovative project that has the potential to lead the way in electric railway preservation.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me by email; [email protected]
Fantastic!
Fantastic news! I see a lot of comments essentially saying " There is already a 38 stock preserved operationally, dont need another" But i couldn't disagree more. If the ambition of battery operation is achieved, not only would it be a big step for EMU preservation as mentioned, but will potentially allow people like me, fascinated in the Underground and its stock but who rarely make it down to London/The island the chance to sample the unit should it be loaned to railways further north.
I would like to see it kept in Island condition, with the operational 1938 stock representing original condition, it would be nice to see the 483 in either "as withdrawn" condition or even NSE.
I agree, plus it is quite an interesting unit in the fact it had a life after the London underground, on a very unique and fascinating line. Then there's the fact that it has run on mainline service at the age of 80! Truly impressive, older than most of us will be expected to live to, although I've got a few decades left to discover the fountain of eternal youth... maybe I'll be able to ride the 38 stock to it!
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,162
Hate to say it...but no-one's forcing you to read this :p
Jeez that’s desperate, going back to find a quote from almost 5 months ago.

Besides, if you read what I actually wrote I wasn’t against the project. Good luck to them with it.
 

lttgroup

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2020
Messages
68
Location
Multiple locations across former NSE territory!
Jeez that’s desperate, going back to find a quote from almost 5 months ago.

Besides, if you read what I actually wrote I wasn’t against the project. Good luck to them with it.
To be absolutely honest you had a point back when you wrote that; I was new to all this and that announcement seemed exciting to me at the time; We have come a long way since then!
 

VEP3417

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2011
Messages
710
Location
Hampshire
if theyre being withdrawn in January, "might" we get a little farewell if restrictions are lifted a bit more? i suppose thats big if

although i read christmas eve is probably the last working for them?
 
Last edited:

TheBeard

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2014
Messages
125
Doesnt a battery have to be in the underframes, and not in a unit? And don't they cost an awful lot?
Not fair to appeal for money for this without a proper engineering approved design.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top