But surely railway managers rather than civil servants should be making these decisions - whether they are the right ones is a different matter!So Northern are dictating to the SoS what lines the choose to run ! What a curious state of affairs.
But surely railway managers rather than civil servants should be making these decisions - whether they are the right ones is a different matter!So Northern are dictating to the SoS what lines the choose to run ! What a curious state of affairs.
But surely railway managers rather than civil servants should be making these decisions - whether they are the right ones is a different matter!
Is it the minister then?Civil servants aren’t taking the decisions.
As someone who for the last 9 months often got the 10:04 PAD-PNZ for business trips to Bridgwater, but coming to an end this month (as I'll be moving near there), I've avoided the loss of Taunton in the nick of time, although good to see something actually making use of the 100mph running through there again. I notice that service is also sub-5 hours to Penzance (4h56m), is this a PR move?In other GWR changes:
The 10.04 Paddington to Penzance on weekdays reverts to running non stop Reading to Exeter (should please @irish_rail). The 09.37 Paddington to Paignton ceases to call at Newbury and Pewsey, instead there’s a new 08.38 Paddington to Westbury semi-fast service.
Weston-super-Mare to Paddington through daytime services are restored on weekdays, running every 2 hours.
Is it the minister then?
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding it, but as a Didcot user I can't help but be disappointed by the May 2023 timetable.
- Services now seem very bunched. London seems to have 3 fasts an hour, but two are within a few minutes of each other. Likewise towards Oxford there are some annoying gaps?
- No longer 2 tph towards Bristol. Surely this affects services from Oxford heading west which is a bit rubbish.
- I haven't looked at frequency and spread of London/Reading to Didcot but if one of the Bristols has been cut, will the Oxfords be consistently 9 cars? I used to avoid the Oxfords (on Sundays for example when they called) as they were often a 5 and full from Oxford already.
- Losing Hayes on the semi fasts means Heathrow is now two changes away. Very frustrating.
- London to Bristol users who use split ticketing at Didcot will now need to be careful. Obviously it's in GWRs interest to close this but the regular pattern being closed is frustrating.
Are there any benefits to this I'm not seeing? I was a bit frustrated with the semi fasts not stopping at Hayes which I knew was coming, but I thought that the Oxford calls would be additional to the Bristols and giving a huge capacity boost between Didcot and Oxford/Reading/London (in lieu of Slough having the capacity), which it isn't if some Bristols are cut. It just seems like a bit of a step backwards from the current TT which, whilst it has its flaws (connections from Oxford to Cholsey/Goring etc are a bit rubbish) is otherwise a relatively nice and regular timetable from Didcot. Someone help me see the positives!
Having looked at the Chiltern timetable, it's been ruined on the Aylesbury side, there won't be any direct services anymore from Marylebone to Aylesbury via high Wycombe, with only the last few trains of the day running the full route, and only 2 in the very early morning running from Aylesbury. Instead, nearly all services on that branch will now be shuttles to and from Princes Risborough. The paths for myb/ays services are still there, and run at the same times as before, but they now terminate at high Wycombe instead. I've also noticed that there's now no services at all from Marylebone and terminating at banbury, with Birmingham services picking up extra stops instead.
Having looked at the Chiltern timetable, it's been ruined on the Aylesbury side, there won't be any direct services anymore from Marylebone to Aylesbury via high Wycombe, with only the last few trains of the day running the full route, and only 2 in the very early morning running from Aylesbury. Instead, nearly all services on that branch will now be shuttles to and from Princes Risborough. The paths for myb/ays services are still there, and run at the same times as before, but they now terminate at high Wycombe instead. I've also noticed that there's now no services at all from Marylebone and terminating at banbury, with Birmingham services picking up extra stops instead.
Ah yes that could be it, hadn't thought about that.isn’t that temporary for HS2 works?
And yet I see countless posts and threads about how to speed up Bristol services which (now that the superfasts aren't happening) all come down to the summary of dropping Didcot and/or Reading stops, and I don't think there is any doubt that Reading cannot be dropped from any services (I for one am very happy to see almost all trains that used to run non-stop through reading in the peaks now calling, I believe there are only gonna be 2 left in the morning and 1 in the evening)Perhaps I'm misunderstanding it, but as a Didcot user I can't help but be disappointed by the May 2023 timetable.
- Services now seem very bunched. London seems to have 3 fasts an hour, but two are within a few minutes of each other. Likewise towards Oxford there are some annoying gaps?
- No longer 2 tph towards Bristol. Surely this affects services from Oxford heading west which is a bit rubbish.
- I haven't looked at frequency and spread of London/Reading to Didcot but if one of the Bristols has been cut, will the Oxfords be consistently 9 cars? I used to avoid the Oxfords (on Sundays for example when they called) as they were often a 5 and full from Oxford already.
- Losing Hayes on the semi fasts means Heathrow is now two changes away. Very frustrating.
- London to Bristol users who use split ticketing at Didcot will now need to be careful. Obviously it's in GWRs interest to close this but the regular pattern being closed is frustrating.
Are there any benefits to this I'm not seeing? I was a bit frustrated with the semi fasts not stopping at Hayes which I knew was coming, but I thought that the Oxford calls would be additional to the Bristols and giving a huge capacity boost between Didcot and Oxford/Reading/London (in lieu of Slough having the capacity), which it isn't if some Bristols are cut. It just seems like a bit of a step backwards from the current TT which, whilst it has its flaws (connections from Oxford to Cholsey/Goring etc are a bit rubbish) is otherwise a relatively nice and regular timetable from Didcot. Someone help me see the positives!
And yet I see countless posts and threads about how to speed up Bristol services which (now that the superfasts aren't happening) all come down to the summary of dropping Didcot and/or Reading stops, and I don't think there is any doubt that Reading cannot be dropped from any services (I for one am very happy to see almost all trains that used to run non-stop through reading in the peaks now calling, I believe there are only gonna be 2 left in the morning and 1 in the evening)
Similarly, Twyford, Maidenhead and Slough passengers will benefit from faster travel times to London, and we all know that there is a lot of travel from these stations to London.
There will always be winners and losers with this kind of thing, and it seems that Didcot is probably losing out (although an extra Oxford service formed of an 80x will definitely not be causing any complaints) but longer distance passengers will be gaining from faster journey times - that is the benefit that you aren't seeing
Yes. This is a really welcome improvement.Indeed the often grumbled about lack of a Cotswold service in the evening peak from Reading is resolved with the 17.58 and 18.58 departures now leaving 1 minute earlier and calling additionally at Reading.
So you are proposing scrapping Bradford-Leeds and Bradford-Skipton, leaving potentially just Bradford-Ilkley once an hour? And you wonder why you get shot down?This is in line with what I keep advocating, but keep getting shot down. Scrap Bradford - Leeds and divert Skipton - Bradford to Leeds.
Sorry for being off topic - I'll shut up now.
I'd be surprised if there were any changes at SWR given that they did a fair few changes in December.LNWR/WMR, TfW, TPE, Greater Anglia & Merseyrail are now up also.
Just SWR, c2c & Grand Central left.
Lincoln - Leicester look to be back to hourly. Still no change on the North Staffs and Robin Hood. Really hope this changes and the 2 hour gaps are filled in.EMR are up as well. They contain the long awaited return of through running from Matlock to Nottingham.
The ministers rubber stamp what is put before them. Technically they "make the decision". In reality they need to have arguments if they want to go against what is presented to them. For something like railway service levels, the officials will know what pet issues their minister gives a shot about, or might cause them trouble, and likely factor in so as to avoid any possible points of conflict.Civil Servants don’t take any decisions on matters such as this. It all goes to ministers either directly, or as part of certain items delegated to (a very few) officials.
More use of 387s, fewer 700s, that and the Cambridge to Ashford services are dead now as there’s a new SE service that has taken the path on the south side, so no need for them to be branded TL anymore as they’re never going south of the river.Great Northern are operating Letchworth/Cambridge services. Why is that the case?
Somehow I doubt that’ll come to fruition but we can live in hope.3tph Birmingham
Most likely 8. 12s are increasingly rare on Southern, especially with the 313s going in May with no replacement.When it goes over to Southern will it run as 8 or 12 coaches?