The Planner
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 16,247
Indeed it was.The strengthening was presumably pre-planned as it would have been required for the WCML block anyway.
Indeed it was.The strengthening was presumably pre-planned as it would have been required for the WCML block anyway.
The strengthening was presumably pre-planned as it would have been required for the WCML block anyway.
Poor from Chiltern with nothing from Aylesbury and Wendover until Tuesday! Ignoring the Met as usual. They really are utterly uselessLooks like a good showing from Chiltern today, plenty of cl68 workings , half hourly Birminghams with up to 8 carriages, Oxfords 5 or 6 carriages
Poor from Chiltern with nothing from Aylesbury and Wendover until Tuesday! Ignoring the Met as usual. They really are utterly useless
But Chiltern can still run via Harrow on the Hill. They've chosen not to. The Met is running as far as Harrow so no reason for Chiltern to bin the entire service for 4 daysA bit unfair - the Met's closed between Aldgate & Harrow on the Hill.
And TFL's "helpful" advice is......
"METROPOLITAN LINE: Good Friday 7, Saturday 8, Sunday 9 and Easter Monday 10 April, no service between Aldgate and Harrow-on-the-Hill due to Planned Engineering work. Use Chiltern Railways services to Wembley Stadium or replacement buses services."
And the Jubilee's closed between Stanmore and West Hampstead - so even the option of RRBs to Stanmore isn't an option.
But Chiltern can still run via Harrow on the Hill. They've chosen not to. The Met is running as far as Harrow so no reason for Chiltern to bin the entire service for 4 days
Not much use from Stoke Mandeville, Wendover, or Great Missenden though. I know Chiltern have no rolling stock, they've been under resourced for years. 25% service reduction after covid, with a further 25% reduction on Saturdays to come in May.According to RTT they are running between Aylesbury & Marylebone via Wycombe tomorrow xx.53 from Marylebone.
I guess they probably agreed with TFL that running a 2 or 3 car DMU into Harrow on the Hill which would then be the only southbound train, wasn't a good idea.
And before you say "more rolling stock", Chiltern had already used that to strengthen their Birmingham services due to the WCML closure.
If they can't be kept going at Reading or Eastleigh, there's the option of getting route conducted to Bristol then up through Birmingham or hiring in drivers that know Reading-Acton-WCML.Anyone know how XC is getting its Voyagers that are in the south back to Three Rivers for maintenance?
They might not need to yet, they can get normal overnight maintenance at Eastleigh TRSMD, that deals with 6 or 7 units overnight in the normal course anyway. I’ve checked for moves from there and Didcot but there’s nothing planned in the way of ECS to Central Rivers for the next week or so.Anyone know how XC is getting its Voyagers that are in the south back to Three Rivers for maintenance?
Eastleigh will be able to handle most things, and are capable of more than just routine maintenance. I wouldn’t be surprised if the voyagers just stay there for the entire time.They might not need to yet, they can get normal overnight maintenance at Eastleigh TRSMD, that deals with 6 or 7 units overnight in the normal course anyway. I’ve checked for moves from there and Didcot but there’s nothing planned in the way of ECS to Central Rivers for the next week or so.
There’d be no need to involve Reading, they‘d be running ECS between Reading and Eastleigh TRSMD normally anyway, and AFAICS there’s no more units than normal overnighting in the south.If they can't be kept going at Reading or Eastleigh, there's the option of getting route conducted to Bristol then up through Birmingham or hiring in drivers that know Reading-Acton-WCML.
I was on the 12:10 today, which was 7 carriages long and it was absolutely heaving, it was not far off being crush loaded and there seemed to quite a few people who did not bother boarding.I'd hold your horses - that info isn't substantiated.
This, however, is a screen grab taken just now from Chiltern's own website - the Oxfords are a 6, 5, 3, 5.
The longest Birmingham is a 7 with two 6 and one 5 - not that's much different to normal.
Paddington with its better connectivity is a better place to arrive unless you happen to be heading for Amersham.
So why, given you're travelling with a 92 year old would you try to shoehorn yourself on what is going to be an overcrowded Chiltern service
As we will be joining at origin in good time there will be no need to shoehorn ourselves on, and we will have a far more pleasant journey than by RRB, with all the traffic issues in Oxford, and a change at Didcot.
According to RTT they are running between Aylesbury & Marylebone via Wycombe tomorrow xx.53 from Marylebone.
I guess they probably agreed with TFL that running a 2 or 3 car DMU into Harrow on the Hill which would then be the only southbound train, wasn't a good idea.
And before you say "more rolling stock", Chiltern had already used that to strengthen their Birmingham services due to the WCML closure.
That said it has become their SOP to RRB their via Amersham service to free up resources for the mainline when required
Feels like your dislike of RRBs means you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Is that, in all probability, a consequence of the railway being closed between Didcot and Oxford, or the WCML being shut between Euston and Milton Keynes Central?My wife and I travelled from High Wycombe to Aylesbury yesterday and saw the 10:10 Marylebone-Birmingham which was an absolutely rammed 5 car, 2+3, with some people unable to get on.
I would imagine that most of it was because of the WCML, but I spoke to some people that had come over to High Wycombe from Slough, Maidenhead and Reading to travel to Birmingham and further north on XC services from Banbury avoiding the problems between Didcot and Oxford.Is that, in all probability, a consequence of the railway being closed between Didcot and Oxford, or the WCML being shut between Euston and Milton Keynes Central?
I doubt it's ever been the result of 2 diversionary routes at once before. There's only so many people you can fit on a train, and when 2 (generally longer/higher capacity trains) are trying to squeeze onto a third, it's not surprising there's a crowd.I've seen some pictures of Marylebone yesterday and I've never seen crowds like it there.
I doubt it's ever been the result of 2 diversionary routes at once before. There's only so many people you can fit on a train, and when 2 (generally longer/higher capacity trains) are trying to squeeze onto a third, it's not surprising there's a crowd.
LUL are involved with NR engineering access discussions though.Not helped of course by presumably "neccessary" works which took out the Jubilee and Metropolitan lines.
(there was a time , when apart from more careful national rail planning was done - when serious attempts were made to integrate LUL and "National Rail" works on key corridors)
Before I end this rant - part from the "unfortunate" issues with this bridge - Maundy Thursday used to be regarded as the busiest passenger day of the year. Lots of relief trains all over the place from Swansea / Penzance and many other key destinations.
"Closer the Customer" ......???????
....and, significantly, Good Friday wasn't particularly busy for long distance traffic, certainly not after midday - but I'm talking of an era when more people used flexible tickets....Not helped of course by presumably "neccessary" works which took out the Jubilee and Metropolitan lines.
(there was a time , when apart from more careful national rail planning was done - when serious attempts were made to integrate LUL and "National Rail" works on key corridors)
Before I end this rant - part from the "unfortunate" issues with this bridge - Maundy Thursday used to be regarded as the busiest passenger day of the year. Lots of relief trains all over the place from Swansea / Penzance and many other key destinations.