I'd say that counts. Its got the same info that a PERITS ticket would have.Here is one I got in June.
As has been stated thought, it lacks a key feature of "tickets" as defined by the NRCoT.I'd say that counts. Its got the same info that a PERITS ticket would have.
As I and others have said, being free doesn't mean it isn't a ticket. The only reason PERTIS machines charged was to stop people pressing the button and wasting the ticket stock.Something you pay nothing for...
A ticket you pay nothing for means there is no consideration. Hence there can be no enforceable rights or obligations under the contract - until you actually get on the train, when an implied contract is formed. Something that you pay nothing for is very difficult to qualify as a ticket in the railway world, simply accept it.As I and others have said, being free doesn't mean it isn't a ticket. The only reason PERTIS machines charged was to stop people pressing the button and wasting the ticket stock.
Hence why it's called a Promise to Pay Permit.Something that you pay nothing for is very difficult to qualify as a ticket in the railway world...
How do I date my photographs to show there isn’t any penalty fare notices? Will Northern suddenly put penalty fare posters at the station?
A ticket you pay nothing for means there is no consideration. Hence there can be no enforceable rights or obligations under the contract - until you actually get on the train, when an implied contract is formed. Something that you pay nothing for is very difficult to qualify as a ticket in the railway world, simply accept it.
The law permits train companies to make completely unjustified charges - your £20 fare as a penalty for not searching every square metre of the station to see if a ticket machine exist is just one of a vast number of examples of this. Northern chose not to provide another ticket machine before beginning to charge Penalty Fares, and these problems have been highlighted on this forum and elsewhere ad infinitum. Of course, there are those who say that these problems simply don't exist, and that by extension people (like you) who have been charged immorally do not exist.How can behaviour like this be allowed to take place?
It sounds like they've accepted that they haven't met the conditions to be able to issue Penalty Fares from that station and common sense has prevailed. Thanks for letting us know.Had a lovely apologetic reply from Northern this afternoon confirming I’ll be refunded the penalty fare I paid.
I won’t reveal too much from the email but they took into account my evidence and the way the gate attendant spoke to me and agreed the signage at Frizinghall isn’t adequate to enforce penalty fares.
It sounds like they've accepted that they haven't met the conditions to be able to issue Penalty Fares from that station and common sense has prevailed. Thanks for letting us know.
This is good news: thanks for sharing it with us.
I hope it is not going off at too much of a tangent if we note for future reference (and for anyone with a similar problem who finds this thread) that the way you reacted to Northern's accusation was to
- check the facts on the ground (i.e. the absence of signage)
- document what you found (take photos)
- get in touch with Northern quickly, presenting your evidence.
This seems to me to be the perfect way to do it, and Northern have conceded within a week of the original incident.
A good result, and perhaps a model for others to follow?
"the way you reacted to Northern's accusation was to
- check the facts on the ground (i.e. the absence of signage)
- document what you found (take photos)
- get in touch with Northern quickly, presenting your evidence.
...Northern have conceded within a week..."
Absolutely. Depending upon the topic it can have positive or negative results for passengers.Do train operating companies actually read these threads?
Absolutely. Depending upon the topic it can have positive or negative results for passengers.
It will be interesting to see what new signs they put up at the station in the coming days.
I would still argue that a sign on Platform Two instructing passengers to go up the road and over the bridge and then back around and down to the machine on Platform One (it took me just over six minutes to walk) isn’t ideal, but at least people will know it’s there.
Hopefully my incident has made Northern review all their stations.
Yes, and RDG, DfT, third party suppliers do too.Do train operating companies actually read these threads?
And this should not be regarded as being entirely negative.Yes, and RDG, DfT, third party suppliers do too.
I never looked at it like that. What doesn’t help Frizinghall is that the entrances to both platforms are at polar opposites at each end of the bridge, so it would be impossible to see the ticket machine in the platform shelter on Platform One unless you walked down the road and steps and went on the platform itself.