dysonsphere
Member
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 518
having being bought up on southern Region I understood the danger of third rail by about 7 years old
having being bought up on southern Region I understood the danger of third rail by about 7 years old
because, i am sure, someone from British Rail came to your school and told you about the danger. They certainly came to mine. You (and others) are assuming that still happens in any coordinated manner. It doesn't.
because, i am sure, someone from British Rail came to your school and told you about the danger. They certainly came to mine. You (and others) are assuming that still happens in any coordinated manner. It doesn't.
I take 50Hz as 50 cycles per second...what am I missing?
I actually witnessed a trespass on Tuesday . It was on the DLR at Gallions Reach while walking to the station, two kids (out of a group of four, age about 11-14) went down the end ramp of one platform, across the track, and back up the other. Turned out the PSA of the previous train to Beckton had seen them right on the edge and had told the control room, so was inspecting the line on the way back until Cyprus. I informed him about what I'd seen and he took my details in case the BTP wanted to contact me (although they haven't done so yet).So much trespass madness going on at the moment - much of which does not make the NRS websites.....
Must be something in the weather ...
It's easy to make reference to the "Darwin Awards" when things like this happen. But at the end of the day, a young person with their life ahead of them has suffered serious injury at the very least. Much like the recent incident at Wrenthorpe sidings, there's only so much comfort to be gained from the "I would've known better" sentiments.
Best post . This forum loves knee-jerk reactions when someone does anything bad on/to the railway :roll:.
So much trespass madness going on at the moment - much of which does not make the NRS websites.....
Must be something in the weather ...
because, i am sure, someone from British Rail came to your school and told you about the danger. They certainly came to mine. You (and others) are assuming that still happens in any coordinated manner. It doesn't.
Absolutely. On many threads such as this, I've been trying to ascertain whether this still happens.
Many of the railways dangers are hidden and it's unreasonable to expect youngsters to automatically know that cables are exposed and the dangers of points etc without anyone explaining it to them.
Tell someone not to do something, and they'll probably go ahead and do it anyway. Explain why and how something might be dangerous and you've got more chance of them not doing it.
A cycle is the complete phase from 0 to + back to 0 then - and back to 0, so 50 cycles would indeed be 100 peaks. In this case the voltage hits +/-25kv 100 times in 50 cycles, or hz
I dont think the voltage is 25k rms, more a peak voltage. Engineers i have spoken to have advised me the voltage tends to hold itself steady around 22-23kv
31kV, surely?...therefore 22kV RMS has a peak value of 311kV...
31kV, surely?
Bet you never even thought of doing again though. I know it's a can of worms, but there is something to be said for corporal punishment, correctly (and sparingly) applied.When I was at primary school I climbed the fence into an electricity substation and got the cane for it.
I agree there's an element of common sense to it, but you'd be surprised at the number of people who think that the OHLE is only live when a train is passing.Nobody came to our school.... Even when I was at primary school I had a funny suspicion that touching an overhead wire might not have a positive outcome. It was the same with crossing a busy motorway, jumping into the sea, off the top of Blackpool Tower or putting my hand into a roaring fire....
I agree there's an element of common sense to it, but you'd be surprised at the number of people who think that the OHLE is only live when a train is passing.
There is no one to blame except the person who has been injured and the people with him, it's not the railway, it's most likely not the parents and it's not railway companies not distributing information on the dangers.
That remark stating "knee-jerk" is rather insulting to those of us who have very many years of experience to bring to bear onto such a debate as this, where events going back to the 1950's can be used in drawing similarities to the events in 2015
Or would you prefer that we sat back and said nothing at all on the matter in question....:roll:
I just find it interesting that on the 375 derailment thread (where there were no serious injuries AFAIK) people were saying that puns were inappropriate as it could've resulted in a serious incident yet in this thread about a seriously injured 14 we're 4 pages in and no-one seems to be too sympathetic. We don't even know the full details yet and I can't help feel that if this thread was about anyone else, or even a member of train crew, this thread would be very different...
When I went to school the classroom was almost within touching distance of the Walsall to Wednesbury line.
We never had the slightest talk about the railways whatsoever, just "eyes front" or similar whenever a train went past.
I seem to remember a handy rule of thumb that it's 1 inch per kV safe working distance. So at 20OkV you would get quite a spark.It wasn't as high as the lines but bloody close - we had a heated row about it, his logic was it wasnt quite as high as the lines, my logic being 200-400kV will jump if offered a low enough resistance path to ground. I wasn't sure how far but I wasn't happy.
I seem to remember a handy rule of thumb that it's I inch per kV. So at 20OkV you would get quite a spark.