• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Porterbrook Cl.769 'Flex' trains from 319s, initially for Northern

Soft Hands

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2020
Messages
36
Location
Bolton
I’m given to understand that at a date to be announced, the current hourly Southport-Stalybridge service will change to run via Atherton and terminate at Manchester Victoria. The hourly Southport-Manchester Oxford Road will remain unchanged. A new service will run from Wigan North Western to Stalybridge via Bolton using Class 323 sets.
This seems to be the plan from the December 2026 timetable change, which is why the 769 leases were recently extended until January 2027. At the same time the Leeds to Wigan Wallgate services will terminate/start from Salford Central.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Halish Railway

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2017
Messages
2,018
Location
West Yorkshire / Birmingham
I’m given to understand that at a date to be announced, the current hourly Southport-Stalybridge service will change to run via Atherton and terminate at Manchester Victoria. The hourly Southport-Manchester Oxford Road will remain unchanged. A new service will run from Wigan North Western to Stalybridge via Bolton using Class 323 sets.
We seem to have gone full circle and returned to something similar to the pre-May 2018 set up for services through Hindley.
 

td97

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2017
Messages
1,447
NH’s Sprinter diagrams are much less optimised, so when the 769s fail, there are a lot less 150/156s available to cover, so we’ve had nothing but 2 cars to cover.
Not forgetting 150226 went to form 150007/8 without replacement, and 150218 is still out of service.
This seems to be the plan from the December 2026 timetable change,
Almost 2 years from the OLE energisation and platform extensions, until actually being used by EMUs? No wonder the Treasury is reluctant to invest in railways.
 

diligentdave

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2007
Messages
333
The additional units will be 769 421 and 452.
Although that was the original thinking as of yet nothing has been agreed.
Presumably a lot of work (bodywork etc) was done on the 769s at conversion, so this overhaul may be relatively cheap. AIUI the state of the 150s may well mean that an almost complete rebuild would be required- not to mention the fact that more spares for the remaining fleet(s) are probably desperately needed.
There was zero bodywork completed during the Flex conversion. 769431 is currently undergoing C6 and corrosion repairs, in some areas its like a colander.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
5,398
Although that was the original thinking as of yet nothing has been agreed.

There was zero bodywork completed during the Flex conversion. 769431 is currently undergoing C6 and corrosion repairs, in some areas its like a colander.
Which proves my point. It's not even as though the 769s provide a much better passenger experience. They are basically four car 150s that break down more often.

Look at it another way. If class 769s are so great, why didn't TfW keep them and send 16 class 150s off lease instead?
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,136
one of the Class 769/9s has been moved to Leicester LIP from Doncaster.
 

amahy

Member
Joined
9 Dec 2024
Messages
76
Location
West Yorkshire
Not suitable in the sense that in peak hours they cannot adhere to the current boarding and alighting times that are required to maintain time. The narrowness of the doors and aisle makes passenger movement much slower than can be attained on 150s and 769s, an issue that also applies to a lesser extent to use of 156s. A 158 that is full and standing on an all stations run is bound to lose time.
Doesn’t stop them putting 158s on Wigan to Leeds, a route which suffers from this exact problem.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
Look at it another way. If class 769s are so great, why didn't TfW keep them and send 16 class 150s off lease instead?
At the time the 150s could go anywhere on the entire TfW network except the Cambrian. The 769s were limited to the Valleys, and even then only to certain parts of them.
 

Senna1210

Member
Joined
30 May 2019
Messages
95
At the time the 150s could go anywhere on the entire TfW network except the Cambrian. The 769s were limited to the Valleys, and even then only to certain parts of them.
True but the requested TFW extension to the lease for the 769s was blocked by external forces.

one of the Class 769/9s has been moved to Leicester LIP from Doncaster.
Yes first of 2

I suspect the TfW 769s were actually delivered to Canton without their pantographs, rather than TfW "ripping them off"
Nope TFW requested them to be removed so they did not have to do the maintenance they were removed while at Pullmans

Although that was the original thinking as of yet nothing has been agreed.

There was zero bodywork completed during the Flex conversion. 769431 is currently undergoing C6 and corrosion repairs, in some areas its like a colander.
Slightly true the GWR and TFW ones had corrosion works done None of the NTL sets did as they were in service with NTL before the conversion
 
Last edited:

bnsf734

Member
Joined
15 Oct 2007
Messages
608
Location
Nuneaton
one of the Class 769/9s has been moved to Leicester LIP from Doncaster.

769935 now renumbered to 769535. I saw it at Swinton. It has no seats inside and rails fitted for pallets/roll cages. Not sure who will be using it.
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
1,929
Location
South Staffordshire
Not sure who will be using it.

Intriguing.
Going back a couple of years ago there were paths in the system for Mossend-Halls Hall services which reversed at Nuneaton. At the time I assume they would be the ROG Orion units, maybe a "tractor+trailer" pair of 768+326, or even the 768 on it's own - requiring diesel traction between Nuneaton and Hams Hall. I believe there were also plans to use freight EMUs to Birch Coppice just a handful of miles away. I have speculated that the traffic loaded onto the Varamis 321s at Birmingham International might have been trucked or vanned from Hams Hall or Birch Coppice, and maybe the 769s will operate for Varamis ? Only a guess
 

Suraggu

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
997
Location
The Far North
769935 now renumbered to 769535. I saw it at Swinton. It has no seats inside and rails fitted for pallets/roll cages. Not sure who will be using it.
I believe Freightliner & GBRf were interested in trialing palletized flows using units. Porterbrook clearly have a desire to continue trials/find customers for its Flex units in one form or another.
 

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,982
Location
Southport
Not forgetting 150226 went to form 150007/8 without replacement, and 150218 is still out of service.
It’s worse than that. Newton Heath lost 150137, 150139 and 150141 to the Marston Vale and then 150111, 150132 and 150226 to the 3 cars which are now at Neville Hill.

Apparently several more NH 150/156s undergoing overhaul, all while the December timetable requires more units and it’s Southport getting 2 cars.

Is trying to squeeze in a Stalybridge electric service out of the EMU fleet actually expected to relieve things, either from 769 reliability (Welsh regiment MIA) or the Sprinter diagrams?
 

Soft Hands

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2020
Messages
36
Location
Bolton
Cracking day in Northern land today for 769's. I think four started the day (424, 434, 442 and 450). By 4.30pm (after the 15.05 Southport to Manchester Oxford Road had been diverted to Victoria to get 769424 onto Newton Heath), there were none left! Evening peak services are being completely cancelled - no DMU's. Lots of splitting of the Blackburn to Headbolt Lane DMU pairs en route to try and keep a service going. I think this was an example of a day when "the last one standing" has to be taken out of service, as there isn't anything out there that could rescue it?
 

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,351
Location
wales
Covid meant they didn't need as many 4-car trains?
And yet they replaced by 4 car trains - in fact I think more 4 car trains, it was their unreliability that done for them. It's worth remembering at the start tfw had to bring in mk2s and 37s as well as extra 153s to cover for them, and keep a rescue loco at rhymney / canton.
 

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,218
Location
Cumbria, UK
I do hope that GBR will put this sort of problem into history by standardising couplers and control connections.
 

amahy

Member
Joined
9 Dec 2024
Messages
76
Location
West Yorkshire
Cracking day in Northern land today for 769's. I think four started the day (424, 434, 442 and 450). By 4.30pm (after the 15.05 Southport to Manchester Oxford Road had been diverted to Victoria to get 769424 onto Newton Heath), there were none left! Evening peak services are being completely cancelled - no DMU's. Lots of splitting of the Blackburn to Headbolt Lane DMU pairs en route to try and keep a service going. I think this was an example of a day when "the last one standing" has to be taken out of service, as there isn't anything out there that could rescue it?
I’m pretty annoyed that Northern are focused on putting 6 car trains on Airedale and Wharfedale (lines that do not need 6 car trains), when situations like this are common with their DMU fleet, to the point that services are being cancelled because of lack of functional units. Yet, no plan is currently in place to sort the situation out. Looks like this will be a regular thing for the next few years.
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
2,604
Location
Greater Manchester
I’m pretty annoyed that Northern are focused on putting 6 car trains on Airedale and Wharfedale (lines that do not need 6 car trains
Westhoughton, Hindley and Ince are all being extended to fit 6 carriages, the overhead wires were turned on earlier this year, and hopefully we'll have 323s running 6 car services soon, freeing DMUs for other services.
That sounds like a plan to me.
 

SLTRegular

Member
Joined
12 Apr 2021
Messages
68
Location
Penrith
I’m pretty annoyed that Northern are focused on putting 6 car trains on Airedale and Wharfedale (lines that do not need 6 car trains), when situations like this are common with their DMU fleet, to the point that services are being cancelled because of lack of functional units. Yet, no plan is currently in place to sort the situation out. Looks like this will be a regular thing for the next few years.
Yorkshire always seems to get the better treatment post Northern merger from Fnw and Ans
 

londonmidland

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2009
Messages
2,032
Location
Leicester
Not sure if this is the right thread for it but two ex-GWR 769s are now at Leicester. Those being 769549 and 535. These are being utilised as part of a trial parcels service for GBRf. These will be maintained at Leicester. A picture from Facebook is posted below:


Ex-GWR 769549 and 535 at Leicester LIP
481675245_28597361576575415_5473201354305457321_n.jpg
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
2,917
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Not sure if this is the right thread for it but two ex-GWR 769s are now at Leicester. Those being 769549 and 535. These are being utilised as part of a trial parcels service for GBRf. These will be maintained at Leicester. A picture from Facebook is posted below:



481675245_28597361576575415_5473201354305457321_n.jpg
Does anyone know where said parcels service might operate?
 

Gricer99

Member
Joined
21 Jun 2020
Messages
256
Location
Hindley
Westhoughton, Hindley and Ince are all being extended to fit 6 carriages, the overhead wires were turned on earlier this year, and hopefully we'll have 323s running 6 car services soon, freeing DMUs for other services.
That sounds like a plan to me.
Seen absolutely no sign of testing, or of the sides to the Iron bridge to the West of Hindley being put back into service. An earlier thread suggested that they will run an electrified service from December 2026!

Why is this all taking so long?

Meanwhile, the 769s have had another day of failures, resulting on shortfalls in most trains on the line as 4 car trains are split to provide a shadow of a service that really is unacceptable.
 

amahy

Member
Joined
9 Dec 2024
Messages
76
Location
West Yorkshire
Seen absolutely no sign of testing, or of the sides to the Iron bridge to the West of Hindley being put back into service. An earlier thread suggested that they will run an electrified service from December 2026!

Why is this all taking so long?

Meanwhile, the 769s have had another day of failures, resulting on shortfalls in most trains on the line as 4 car trains are split to provide a shadow of a service that really is unacceptable.
This is what I do not understand. They could theoretically have split the Southport service at Wigan from the May timetable change, with 3/4 car EMUs between Oxford Road/Stalybridge and Wigan North Western, and a DMU shuttle from the bay platform at Wallgate. And/or the Leeds to Wigan Wallgate service could be extended to Southport (they have over an hour turnaround in a siding at Wigan as things stand, which is hardly efficient diagramming). While this would result in a slight reduction in diagrammed coaches on some Wigan-Manchester trains, it would be far better than the current situation, where they are short formed more often than not.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,146
And yet they replaced by 4 car trains - in fact I think more 4 car trains, it was their unreliability that done for them. It's worth remembering at the start tfw had to bring in mk2s and 37s as well as extra 153s to cover for them, and keep a rescue loco at rhymney / canton.

I was being a little facetious but I would be very surprised to learn that capacity on the lines they operated was sustained, or even increased, in the immediate aftermath of their withdrawal given the effects of Covid.
 

Top