Ashley Hill
Established Member
I’m aware that several LNER buffet cars survived into the 1970s carrying this livery,but did any other pre-nationalisation passenger stock survive to wear blue and grey?
Last edited:
A few LMS-designed, but BR-built 57' carriages were repainted in blue and grey in the late 1960s. I recall seeing them on West Coast reliefs occasionally, but I think they were all gone by about 1970.I’m aware that several LNER buffet cars survived into the 1970s carrying this livery,but did any other pre-nationalisation passenger stock survive to wear blue and grey?
The Brighton Belle EMUs did carry B&G in their twilight years.Did any SR emus carry it? Maybe they did go to BR blue but not blue and grey.
The 4SUBs were painted blue. I don't recall seeing any in blue and grey.Did any SR emus carry it? Maybe they did go to BR blue but not blue and grey.
Due to the Southern's very modern views about recycling, some of the 4EPB carriage underframes were very much older than the bodies they carried. This was a matter which gained some publicity following the accident at Cannon Street in 1991.The EPBs went to blue/grey. Most were post-1950 build, but some had trailers rewired from SUB units, whose building crossed nationalisation time; someone will know if any of these pre-1948 Ones were in sets in the new colours.
I’ve noticed that Gresley buffets were famously the last pre-nationalisation hauled coaches on BR, with Sir Nigel’s vision of varnished teak painted over in blue and grey and the art deco interior ripped out for an oppressive 1960s one matching Mk1s, but I’m not sure blue and grey is the best distinction for surviving vehicles.I’m aware that several LNER buffet cars survived into the 1970s carrying this livery,but did any other pre-nationalisation passenger stock survive to wear blue and grey?
502s except 2 vehicles were long gone by 1980 but carried blue and grey so the policy of no grey on multiple units must have changed earlier than that. 503s continued to 1985, awaiting 455/7s delivered in blue and grey to displace the 508s diverted to the South Western, so blue and grey was still current.The LMS late 1930s electrics on Merseyside lasted right through the all-blue era, and well into blue & grey times after the policy changed around 1980.
The various LMS-design hauled coaches and sleepers which got the livery were almost wholly the last of the production, which had run on for several years into BR times.
These were 1923 standard stock, of the London Underground but nothing to do with BR until purchased for IOW electrification, so nothing to do with the grouping either. They were however 10 years pre-LPTB. Were they in fact built by the private UERL?The 485s and 486s on the Isle of Wight wore blue and grey for a while. They dated from 1923, so were almost pre-amalgamation, never mind pre-nationalisation.
That’ll be the result of preservation groups using what they’ve got available / been given, not an indication of their survival that long in main line passenger service. Alternatively they survived as departmental stock and received whatever upholstery was kicking around.When was the general stock of Gresley non-buffet vehicles, or those of other companies actually withdrawn from passenger service? Apparently the arrival of DMUs displaced them earlier than expected. I’ve seen preserved Stanier vehicles with NSE moquette, suggesting they ran peak extras into the 1980s.
The EPBs went to blue/grey. Most were post-1950 build, but some had trailers rewired from SUB units, whose building crossed nationalisation time; someone will know if any of these pre-1948 Ones were in sets in the new colours.
Good shout!The Brighton Belle EMUs did carry B&G in their twilight years.
The 313s and I think the 312s were blue and grey from new, circa 1975.502s except 2 vehicles were long gone by 1980 but carried blue and grey so the policy of no grey on multiple units must have changed earlier than that. 503s continued to 1985, awaiting 455/7s delivered in blue and grey to displace the 508s diverted to the South Western, so blue and grey was still current.
The last passenger carrying vehicles of pre-Nationalisation design, and carrying pre-Nationalisation fleet numbers, were the two Thompson designed buffet cars E1705E and E1706E built just after World War 2 for the Flying Scotsman. I'm not sure whether they actually entered service before 1 January 1948.I’ve noticed that Gresley buffets were famously the last pre-nationalisation hauled coaches on BR
Only one LNER sleeper, E1211E.some LMS and LNER sleepers
There was a huge cull in the period immediately after the Beeching Report. One of the first actions was the withdrawal of the large fleet of pre-Nationalisation coaches used only a few times a year on summer Saturday services and excursion traffic.When was the general stock of Gresley non-buffet vehicles, or those of other companies actually withdrawn from passenger service?
This is off topic but I'll answer to put it to bed. The class 313s and the GN class 312s were blue and grey from new, but the Great Eastern and London Midland class 312s were plain blue.The 313s and I think the 312s were blue and grey from new, circa 1975.
Also the Hyperion Bar, painted Blue and Grey as the Nightcap Bar.The 'Golden Arrow' Pullman cars (although privately built 1951-2) ended their days in 1972 in blue and grey. For a period, some cars were in the 'reversed' blue and grey.
It seems no GWR (or designed) coaches made it into blue/grey then. Did the WR have a 1960s cull of pre-nationalisation stock? I remember seeing the Derby RTC auto coach out and about.
Tangential to this, given that the Mk1 fleet seemed pretty vast I assume this means that there were simply not enough restaurant or buffet cars built to meet the need. Was there any particular reason for that?I didn't understand how the Gresley Buffets survived so long; they were wooden bodied. Bullied design coaches and the 'Portholes' (both all-steel) were taken out of service because of concerns about safety - from memory, these two had a design end loading of only 100 tons/f whereas the Mk1s were 200. I don't think that a Gresley would have fared well if marshalled between all-steel stock in a collision.
Tangential to this, given that the Mk1 fleet seemed pretty vast I assume this means that there were simply not enough restaurant or buffet cars built to meet the need. Was there any particular reason for that?
There's a (poor quality) colour photo of a Hawksworth SK in blue/grey at the following link:It seems no GWR (or designed) coaches made it into blue/grey then. Did the WR have a 1960s cull of pre-nationalisation stock? I remember seeing the Derby RTC auto coach out and about.
Others will know more of the details, but anecdotally, catering vehicles must be a lot more expensive to build than standard coaches, seeing they house commercial grade kitchens and service areas with all the associated complexities of drinking water plumbing, wiring, cooking fuel, etc. Also, operating practices on some routes (e.g. WR) involved uncoupling a portion of the train, including the catering vehicle at a mid-way point. When aggregated, this presumably resulted in some catering vehicles at least running lower annual mileages than other stock.Tangential to this, given that the Mk1 fleet seemed pretty vast I assume this means that there were simply not enough restaurant or buffet cars built to meet the need. Was there any particular reason for that?
IIRC, the RFs had no buffet counter which made sales of drinks and snacks problematic. This could only be done from the pantry, which obstructed staff if they were trying to serve main meals in the saloon portion of the carriage at the same time. Some RK 80000s survived until around 1980, though these examples had propane fired kitchens. They were designed for full meal service into saloons on each side and, fully staffed, could deliver 224 covers at a sitting. Useful for full dining specials on race days and the like, but of limited value for everyday traffic. With service to every table, clearly no need for a buffet counter here.What was odd was that the first B.R. Standard catering stock, the RFs (300s) and all kitchen (80000) had very short lives, though there were probably good reasons - the first kitchen cars had anthracite stoves, which might have been a challenge. There were also the conversions of pre-nat stock to the early form of buffet cars which were known as 'caf-cars' - I think that they had 'Cafeteria' branding - which might have obviated building standard RMBs.
It was odd that, in the early 1960s, the prestige trains on the West Coast were formed of Standard seating coaches but often an L.M.S. 12 wheel 'diner'. The similar mismatch in the 1970s was the West Coast Mk2 sets with a Mk1 KB (1500, with the totem pole - and very heavy ride on the AL-bashed track!)
Thanks for those points. Yes I remember in my youth thinking that Mk1 catering vehicles on the WCML looked 'out of kilter' with more modern stock - and that I think would have been into the 1980s too.What was odd was that the first B.R. Standard catering stock, the RFs (300s) and all kitchen (80000) had very short lives, though there were probably good reasons - the first kitchen cars had anthracite stoves, which might have been a challenge. There were also the conversions of pre-nat stock to the early form of buffet cars which were known as 'caf-cars' - I think that they had 'Cafeteria' branding - which might have obviated building standard RMBs.
It was odd that, in the early 1960s, the prestige trains on the West Coast were formed of Standard seating coaches but often an L.M.S. 12 wheel 'diner'. The similar mismatch in the 1970s was the West Coast Mk2 sets with a Mk1 KB (1500, with the totem pole - and very heavy ride on the AL-bashed track!)
Thanks - interesting to read these observations. Points well made no doubt.Others will know more of the details, but anecdotally, catering vehicles must be a lot more expensive to build than standard coaches, seeing they house commercial grade kitchens and service areas with all the associated complexities of drinking water plumbing, wiring, cooking fuel, etc. Also, operating practices on some routes (e.g. WR) involved uncoupling a portion of the train, including the catering vehicle at a mid-way point. When aggregated, this presumably resulted in some catering vehicles at least running lower annual mileages than other stock.
IIRC, the RFs had no buffet counter which made sales of drinks and snacks problematic. This could only be done from the pantry, which obstructed staff if they were trying to serve main meals in the saloon portion of the carriage at the same time. Some RK 80000s survived until around 1980, though these examples had propane fired kitchens. They were designed for full meal service into saloons on each side and, fully staffed, could deliver 224 covers at a sitting. Useful for full dining specials on race days and the like, but of limited value for everyday traffic. With service to every table, clearly no need for a buffet counter here.
The Mark 1 catering cars survived because no Mark 2 catering cars were designed. It was not until the Mark 3s came along that the possibilities of microwaves and other modern amenities of an all electric kitchen could be enjoyed. I suspect that some older saloons may have survived because they had a layout and tables specifically designed for dining. Whatever the benefits of the trapezoidal tables in Mark 2s may have been regarding access, fitting four place settings on them was challenging and serving soup decided perilous. Thus the use of second class Mark 2s for dining was unusual. An RKB or an RBR fitted with commonwealth bogies could give its adjoining Mark 2 saloon an exhilarating ride if it was running rough.
Two factors to add:What was odd was that the first B.R. Standard catering stock, the RFs (300s) and all kitchen (80000) had very short lives, though there were probably good reasons - the first kitchen cars had anthracite stoves, which might have been a challenge. There were also the conversions of pre-nat stock to the early form of buffet cars which were known as 'caf-cars' - I think that they had 'Cafeteria' branding - which might have obviated building standard RMBs.
It was odd that, in the early 1960s, the prestige trains on the West Coast were formed of Standard seating coaches but often an L.M.S. 12 wheel 'diner'. The similar mismatch in the 1970s was the West Coast Mk2 sets with a Mk1 KB (1500, with the totem pole - and very heavy ride on the AL-bashed track!)
Even in the late 50s early 60s there was stock stored that hadn't turned a wheel for years but presumably thought too good to scrap. On a closed line around Wolverton. Connington and Micheldever seemed to have a few vintage ones, too, as you whizzed past.Two factors to add:
1. many cars had spells out of service in WW2 so weren't life-expired. Hence building Mk1 catering vehicles wasn't priority, except for the early triples which were to make all Mk 1 sets on each region.
2. Said triples were over-provision on many routes (the SR moved its sole car from the Royal Wessex to a weekend-only Ilfracombe trip replacing the Devon Belle) though I think they survived in charter sets - I recall seeing RKs in an Ascot race special at Clapham Yard around 1980 (unless they were the version with a tiny buffet counter?)
The 800xx vehicles were RK (Kitchen Car) whereas the 15xx vehicles were RKB (Kitchen Buffet). It was the presence of the Buffet and that pole with space to rest drinks that probably saw the latter numbered in the passenger carrying series because people could consume their refreshments in the vehicle, so technically making them passenger carrying!The ones with the tiny buffet counter had no seats, but a curious circular table around a thick vertical column (the 'Totem Pole') and these were the KB - 1500s. The 80000s were number in the 8nnnn series because they were pedantically 'non-passenger carrying' but the 1500s didn't have seating, either.
R seems to have been used to indicate catering vehicles rather than Restaurant per say, and several never had Restaurant in their name - RK (Kitchen Car), RKB (Kitchen Buffet), RG (Griddle) and RMB (Miniature Buffet).The incorrect use of 'R' in the codes has always bugged me. In a hotel, the door marked 'Restaurant' leads to where you eat, not the kitchen!