EbbwJunction1
Established Member
- Joined
- 25 Mar 2010
- Messages
- 1,632
Bridges?
NoBridges?
NoFatal accidents?
NoStatues
Platforms Nine-and-Three-Quarters? (I'm being facetious)Doncaster station has two of these, but Kings Cross has three
NoPlatforms Nine-and-Three-Quarters? (I'm being facetious)
CorrectOpen access operators?
I'll give you that. 86 211 was "City of Milton Keynes" and 86 429 was named "The Times" followed by two dates - that of the year that the paper was founded and that of the year of naming. Your turn.86 211
86 429
...but I couldn't tell you the names without looking them up, but I think one of them was City of Milton Keynes.
The last member of each class to operate on the national network?Thank you.
What do the following seven locomotives have in common as of January 2025?
03 081 ( carries the original number D2381 - the number carried is irrelevant to this question )
07 007
25 278
45 118
D1015
87 002
89 001
Thank you.
What do the following seven locomotives have in common as of January 2025?
03 081 ( carries the original number D2381 - the number carried is irrelevant to this question )
07 007
25 278
45 118
D1015
87 002
89 001
This is a draw, I think!!!
@xotGD - not the last, but the only example of those classes currently main line registered.
That's not quite the same as "last" as some locomotives can be added and removed from the registry
@Cowley has correctly stated they are main line registered, but without the "sole example" distinction, although that's certainly close enough!!
Please decide between yourselves which of you can register the next question to be introduced to traffic.
Well three of those are incorrect, but I'll let you have it.Keighley, Oakworth, Haworth or Oxenhope?
Thanks! Next up....still on the 8F theme:Well three of those are incorrect, but I'll let you have it.
48305 will be a guest at the KWVR steam gala, while 48431 is a static exhibit at Oxenhope.
Sorry for the delay and any inconvenience caused. It was indeed 48188. Your turn to drive the breakdown crane!48188
That was quickDespatch?