• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

RealTimeTrains website

louis97

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,041
Location
Derby
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
3,337
Location
Burgess Hill
Thanks, the route out to Balham from Victoria we're aware of (have got the nessessary data, just need to process it). However the Purley and Earlswood situation I was not aware of, think I know why, but will take a look.
I've re-checked now, and it's also showing that at Three Bridges. Other services don't seem to report TRUST (Smart) when passing Three Bridges, so might be an anomaly.

This Thameslink service (https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:L62673/2023-04-19/detailed) also reports it for South Croydon and Norwood Junction, Bricklayers Junction and New Cross Gate. Same also relayed with another TL service too: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:L62840/2023-04-19/detailed.
 

louis97

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,041
Location
Derby
I've re-checked now, and it's also showing that at Three Bridges. Other services don't seem to report TRUST (Smart) when passing Three Bridges, so might be an anomaly.

This Thameslink service (https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:L62673/2023-04-19/detailed) also reports it for South Croydon and Norwood Junction, Bricklayers Junction and New Cross Gate. Same also relayed with another TL service too: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:L62840/2023-04-19/detailed.
Beginning to think there might be NR data feed issues today, but will take a look anyhow.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
Is there any way RTT could expand on the info as to the next scheduled working of a unit? There is limited support, I believe through associations, but other sites are able to give next workings for pretty much every service, and this is the only function that I still can’t use RTT for.

It's already possible to do this on RTT. You can do it by train, see which platform it arrives in at destination, then RTT will show the next train to depart that platform and its formation. I've used this feature before to find out where a particular unit will finish at the end of the day.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
28,979
Location
Redcar
It's already possible to do this on RTT. You can do it by train, see which platform it arrives in at destination, then RTT will show the next train to depart that platform and its formation. I've used this feature before to find out where a particular unit will finish at the end of the day.
I believe they mean for RTT to do automatically without needing to do the legwork yourself. For instance this service has a helpful link telling you the next working from Darlington:


Wheras at the Saltburn end you have to do it manually.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
I believe they mean for RTT to do automatically without needing to do the legwork yourself. For instance this service has a helpful link telling you the next working from Darlington:


Wheras at the Saltburn end you have to do it manually.

Fair enough. It doesn't take more than a couple of minutes 'legwork' so not really hugely inconvenient.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
28,979
Location
Redcar
Fair enough. It doesn't take more than a couple of minutes 'legwork' so not really hugely inconvenient.
Well no it isn't (though it can be tricky for busy stations) but it would certainly be a nice quality of life improvement if it could be expanded.
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
2,347
Location
Bath
(though it can be tricky for busy stations)
This is my main issue, take Paddington for example, there are hundreds of workings an hour, with XR, GW and XC, and it is easy to miss a working at a platform and skip to the next one.
 

arb

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2010
Messages
498
Even if the requested feature wasn't officially added to the UI, the ability to search/filter by platform number would make it a lot easier to do manually.
 

Tom

Member
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
616
Location
35,000ft
So - a platform number filter won't happen on any free version of RTT. Frankly, we get too many queries from TOCs for it wanting it on the public version: that alone puts me off from doing it. It will, when it turns up, appear in a paid-for ad-free version.

The QoL improvement we're intending to do won't do next workings as that's an enthusiast thing (so may turn up in a paid for version in future) but more akin to what the likes of FlightAware currently does.
 

liamf656

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
875
Location
Derby
Not sure if anyone else is experiencing this but as I search various locations dated 26/27th April hundreds of services are missing! The below screenshot shows the results when searching all departures from Manchester Piccadilly on 26th April. Everything is missing between 0300 and 1530 (save for a couple), and this is happening everywhere I search! I can still access individual services by following the “service forms…” links.
 

Attachments

  • 9DD23A6C-D6A5-47B9-B052-2DB6441F7311.png
    9DD23A6C-D6A5-47B9-B052-2DB6441F7311.png
    797.3 KB · Views: 83

Dood75

Member
Joined
8 May 2019
Messages
213
Yes, I found the same when looking at East Midlands Parkway for the same dates (before when I checked on the 24th and still now)

Dood
 

GWRrrr

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2019
Messages
52
Location
.
On the Exmouth-Paigntons, not only are services missing, but some services that were there have disappearred next time I look. For example, RTT now says only one service at Exmouth on 26/4, and none at all on 27/4. But at least some of them were there when I looked yesterday, and @SJ21 confirmed (in another post) that they were running.



For comparison, this is 28/4 (until these also disappear :s)


Thanks
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,462
Not sure if anyone else is experiencing this but as I search various locations dated 26/27th April hundreds of services are missing! The below screenshot shows the results when searching all departures from Manchester Piccadilly on 26th April. Everything is missing between 0300 and 1530 (save for a couple), and this is happening everywhere I search! I can still access individual services by following the “service forms…” links.

Yes, I found the same when looking at East Midlands Parkway for the same dates (before when I checked on the 24th and still now)

Dood

On the Exmouth-Paigntons, not only are services missing, but some services that were there have disappearred next time I look. For example, RTT now says only one service at Exmouth on 26/4, and none at all on 27/4. But at least some of them were there when I looked yesterday, and @SJ21 confirmed (in another post) that they were running.



For comparison, this is 28/4 (until these also disappear :s)


Thanks


I think the RTT team have posted on here multiple times before - this forum isn’t a support pathway actively monitored by them.

While the heads up to others is of course welcome; I trust you’ve followed up by contacting RTT about the issues you are having?
 

GWRrrr

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2019
Messages
52
Location
.
I think the RTT team have posted on here multiple times before - this forum isn’t a support pathway actively monitored by them.

While the heads up to others is of course welcome; I trust you’ve followed up by contacting RTT about the issues you are having?

Yep, fair point, I've done that now.
 
Last edited:

Tom

Member
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
616
Location
35,000ft
The issue mentioned above has been identified - it has been caused by a new TOC code appearing from the 25th causing slightly unexpected behaviour. The TOC code is #| and has appeared on a number of freight schedules operated by Colas.

Those of a technical nature will understand if I say that parameterised queries have caused it...
 

Future

Member
Joined
28 Nov 2021
Messages
234
Location
Devon
I’ve noticed Hanson & Hall have been added as a separate operator on RTT under the code ‘YG’. How come RTT have done this with H&H but not any other freight operators? Note ‘SO’ has been changed to read ‘RailAdventure’ too.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
72,950
Location
Yorkshire
I’ve noticed Hanson & Hall have been added as a separate operator on RTT under the code ‘YG’. How come RTT have done this with H&H but not any other freight operators? Note ‘SO’ has been changed to read ‘RailAdventure’ too.
Are you sure Realtimetrains have added this as custom data, or could it be in the open data feed?
 

GWRrrr

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2019
Messages
52
Location
.
The issue mentioned above has been identified - it has been caused by a new TOC code appearing from the 25th causing slightly unexpected behaviour. The TOC code is #| and has appeared on a number of freight schedules operated by Colas.

Those of a technical nature will understand if I say that parameterised queries have caused it...

Many thanks Tom, a really quick response from you and the team. I've looked this morning and data for Exmouth-Paignton seems 100%.
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
6,895
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
Just a small query. On Realtime Trains (RTT), some workings which reverse en route are shown as "Service Reverses Here", while others on the same route are not shown with that text. I have recently noticed several workings from the North Downs Line to Tonbridge, which reverse at Redhill, not showing the text, while others have done. Is there a rationale behind this or is it simply a data entry issue? Apologies if this is covered elesewhere - couldn't find it on a quick search.
 

louis97

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,041
Location
Derby
Just a small query. On Realtime Trains (RTT), some workings which reverse en route are shown as "Service Reverses Here", while others on the same route are not shown with that text. I have recently noticed several workings from the North Downs Line to Tonbridge, which reverse at Redhill, not showing the text, while others have done. Is there a rationale behind this or is it simply a data entry issue? Apologies if this is covered elesewhere - couldn't find it on a quick search.
Its a data entry issue on Network Rails side.
 

william.martin

On Moderation
Joined
18 Oct 2022
Messages
847
Location
Telford
Screenshot_20230509-185429.png
Why is crosscountry's 221128 showing to be on an Avanti service and is showing with an Avanti voyager 'know your train diagram'?

Is it a typo on NR's side?
 

louis97

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,041
Location
Derby
Why is crosscountry's 221128 showing to be on an Avanti service and is showing with an Avanti voyager 'know your train diagram'?

Is it a typo on NR's side?
Looks like a typo by whoever put the VSTP schedule in. It was an XC empty with a unit ex 1V49.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
13,935
Location
UK
Just a small query. On Realtime Trains (RTT), some workings which reverse en route are shown as "Service Reverses Here", while others on the same route are not shown with that text. I have recently noticed several workings from the North Downs Line to Tonbridge, which reverse at Redhill, not showing the text, while others have done. Is there a rationale behind this or is it simply a data entry issue? Apologies if this is covered elesewhere - couldn't find it on a quick search.
It purely depends on whether the schedule has the RM activity code in the field for that location. It's not added automatically, so if both the TOC and Network Rail planners forget to add it, it won't be present. It's not crucial unless the service in question has actual, physical seat reservations - which GWR's Thames Valley Turbo services don't.
 

Top