• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

South Wales 'Metro' updates

positron

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2023
Messages
254
Location
Cardiff
It would seem that all that traffic going south would have to go via customhouse street/penarth road (which is currently a bus lane - are the proposing to allow all cars on it again?).
No it'll stay busses only (except for access to Canal Wharf). They're suggesting people use Central link as the main north south road.
Screenshot_20240915-173156.png
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
8,061
Location
West Wiltshire
The South Wales metro consultation opens today for feedback (open for 6 weeks)


There are 5 public drop in events, today is at Butetown
 

positron

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2023
Messages
254
Location
Cardiff

It looks like the Cardiff cross rail consultation is live on the site (I didn't think it was planned till tomorrow?)

The South Wales metro consultation opens today for feedback (open for 6 weeks)


There are 5 public drop in events, today is at Butetown
Ah interesting looks like it was actually public for a bit now but the actual bit to respond has been added today.

Already got people complaining that east Cardiff has nothing even though this is exactly what is needed to eventually allow east Cardiff there transport...

Though Tfw aren't helping themselves by not explaining the full proposed future scope of cross rail and how this is a vital middle piece of the puzzle.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,161
Might just be a holding design for the render but the tram stop at Central looks cheap and incongruous (and why the gap in the canopy?), with no connecting roof to the rail station (reminds me of Edinburgh airport tram….)
Is it set up so it can be extended over the river to the west?
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
4,470
Might just be a holding design for the render but the tram stop at Central looks cheap and incongruous (and why the gap in the canopy?), with no connecting roof to the rail station (reminds me of Edinburgh airport tram….)
Is it set up so it can be extended over the river to the west?

I seem to recall at one point they were suggesting a covered route between the railway station and the new bus station, which has failed to materialise.
 

Jez

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2011
Messages
1,745
Location
Neath
Just seen the report on Wales at Six (ITV Wales). I think its a good idea having direct trams from Central to Cardiff Bay. It can be a right pain having to go to Queen Street and change. Often need to use 3 trains just to get to the Bay so no wonder many people opt for the bus. Apparently it wont be until 2029 anyway so some way to go yet at the pace these things happen - the trams arent even entering service on the core valleys until next year it seems.
 
Joined
22 Jun 2013
Messages
499
I saw a comment on a Facebook group that the initial plan is for 2tph from Central to the Bay. This would seem a poor service for £100m. I'm hoping it'll be at least 4-6tph.
 
Last edited:

Tumbleweed

Member
Joined
17 Apr 2013
Messages
185
If true that would improve in time seeing that Cardiff's city centre seems to be relocating to the Bay.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,222
Some fun on the valley lines this afternoon. Not sure what kicked it off but lots of late running putting pressure on later services due to the single track sections and lots of stop skipping too. Does make me question how the infrastructure will cope with more trains but I guess at least by then if a train does skip your stop the next once will be soon - in theory.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
4,470
Some fun on the valley lines this afternoon. Not sure what kicked it off but lots of late running putting pressure on later services due to the single track sections and lots of stop skipping too. Does make me question how the infrastructure will cope with more trains but I guess at least by then if a train does skip your stop the next once will be soon - in theory.

Apart from the services which remain half hourly, of course.

Incidentally there were problems in the morning too.

On top of the usual "more trains than usual needing repairs" cancellations.
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
4,444
Some fun on the valley lines this afternoon. Not sure what kicked it off but lots of late running putting pressure on later services due to the single track sections and lots of stop skipping too. Does make me question how the infrastructure will cope with more trains but I guess at least by then if a train does skip your stop the next once will be soon - in theory.
Though with the existing half hourly services the additional double track sections would have given more flexibility than previously to minimise delays.
 

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
686
Does make me question how the infrastructure will cope with more trains but I guess at least by then if a train does skip your stop the next once will be soon - in theory.
Last month’s timetable consultation included a desire to increase turnaround times at terminal stations on the Valleys routes so as to enable better recovery from minor delays and disruptions. One thing to bear in mind is that there will be signalling upgrades at Queen St in May next year - I’m not sure of the specifics as nothing has been published, but given the desire to run an intensive timetable I expect that the upgrade will allow more trains through the junctions more quickly. EDIT: having looked back through the consultation document, it mentions Dynamic Route Setting and Digital Conflict Resolution as signalling technologies that will be introduced. There’s also mention of making the Mobile Operations Managers a 24hr service, which will reduce delays when infrastructure problems occur early in the morning or late at night.
 
Last edited:

LlanishenBull

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2023
Messages
23
Location
Cardiff
Some fun on the valley lines this afternoon. Not sure what kicked it off but lots of late running putting pressure on later services due to the single track sections and lots of stop skipping too. Does make me question how the infrastructure will cope with more trains but I guess at least by then if a train does skip your stop the next once will be soon - in theory.
I missed a mainline connection recently due to three cancellations in a row (inc two that skipped my stop). Incidents will happen but they need to learn to manage them better, for customers not their own convenience, when things go awry.
 

positron

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2023
Messages
254
Location
Cardiff
I seem to recall at one point they were suggesting a covered route between the railway station and the new bus station, which has failed to materialise.
I think that's planned as part of the "Metro Central" works on the train station. Stuff like extending platform 0 and other works. So it may still happen one day. If they're going to move the station building forwards there's no point building the roof yet.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,222
I had missed the increasing of turnout times as part of the extra services - very much needed so glad that is part of the plan.
I missed a mainline connection recently due to three cancellations in a row (inc two that skipped my stop). Incidents will happen but they need to learn to manage them better, for customers not their own convenience, when things go awry.
I guess to play devil's advocate a little, I only made my mainline connection yesterday because the stop skipping allowed time being pulled back - had the service run as usual I'd have missed the connection. So there is an element of swings and roundabouts, but yeah there absolutely should be an effort to avoid multiple services in a row doing that (or have them skip different stops if that is needed).
 

Wuggie Norple

Member
Joined
9 Sep 2021
Messages
31
Location
Cardiff
I have to say, I expect the highway changes proposed will result in a lot of feedback, with a big reduction in capacity, and reduced options for those travelling from north of the main line towards Penarth Road.

View attachment 165553
Hi John,
Very useful plans - where did you find them - or did you make them?

There is a discussion on Cardiff Nextdoor about the consultation and I was wondering if I am free to post these plans there to inform the discussion.

Cheers,
Nick
 

positron

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2023
Messages
254
Location
Cardiff
Hi John,
Very useful plans - where did you find them - or did you make them?

There is a discussion on Cardiff Nextdoor about the consultation and I was wondering if I am free to post these plans there to inform the discussion.

Cheers,
Nick
They're from the consultation documents on the consultation site.
 

Attachments

  • a4c5eff36278753825707c57cad8b1fb_Cardiff_Crossrail_Information_Pack_FINAL_FOR_PRINT.pdf
    5.8 MB · Views: 37

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
4,444
I was slightly surprised to see that the Core Valley Lines, although no longer part of Network Rail, are still included in the Sectional Appendix, and are being updated as changes are made. (Although the pages are dated 2009, which is even more bizarre!) Can anyone explain why this is?
 

Fazaar1889

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2022
Messages
595
Location
South East
Is there a satellite map of the proposed crossrail route? I can't seem to find one online. Perhaps it's been imported into a custom google maps?
 

Nathan99

New Member
Joined
20 Jan 2023
Messages
1
Location
Cardiff
Is there a satellite map of the proposed crossrail route? I can't seem to find one online. Perhaps it's been imported into a custom google maps?
There is a map at this link of possible routes for the eastern part of Cardiff Crossrail. The masterplan for the Arena will surely have the exact route in it.


The western section will use the existing track bed apart from in Fairwater where around 20 homes have been built on the old track alignment on Kirton Close and Fairwood Close.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
4,470
I don't believe there is at the other crossing (which couldn't really have better sight lines, unlike Ty Glas).

I've had the opportunity to travel over this line and keep an eye on the speed via GPS.

There doesn't currently seem to be a 20 mph limit on the crossing between Rhiwbina and Whitchurch.

On a train stopping at both stations as normal we went over at about 30 mph.

On a train which was late and ran non stop from Ty Glas to Coryton it managed to reach 45 a little before the crossing and didn't have to brake until well after the crossing.

Before that, after Heath we only got to 40 mph before having to brake for Ty Glas.

So I don't think an increase from 45 to 50 mph between Heath and Ty Glas will have much impact until the new trains are in operation. For now it looks as if the changes will just make things slower.

Maybe with trains with better acceleration the inceased speed on the run between Heath and Ty Glas will more than compensate for not being able to get above 20 mph between Rhiwbina and Whitchurch, though it will have more of an impact on a non stop train.
 

DD2

Member
Joined
17 Nov 2018
Messages
6
There is a map at this link of possible routes for the eastern part of Cardiff Crossrail. The masterplan for the Arena will surely have the exact route in it.


The western section will use the existing track bed apart from in Fairwater where around 20 homes have been built on the old track alignment on Kirton Close and Fairwood Close.
Regarding Kirton Close and Fairwood Close, could tram street running be possible here to route around the built houses? I am not familiar with the area.
 

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
686
Regarding Kirton Close and Fairwood Close, could tram street running be possible here to route around the built houses? I am not familiar with the area.
These are built just on the approach to the former junction with the existing railway line (between Fairwater and Danescourt stations). To be honest, it's not immediately obvious how you'd route the line without at least a few demolitions, even if you did use street running.
 

Smwrff

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2023
Messages
103
Location
Doha
I think you would have to demolish around 6 houses - unavoidable - but for the greater good. Cardiff Council should just buy them up as they become available - rent them out until demolition needed.
 

Tom125

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2019
Messages
67
A letter sent from TfW says that during the upcoming closure of the line they will be working on the passing loop between Fernhill (Glenboi) and Cwmbach. Will this loop be used for passing passenger trains? If not what is the purpose of keeping the loop in situ?
 

Tumbleweed

Member
Joined
17 Apr 2013
Messages
185
I assume that the loop will still be needed if the line will be handling 4 trains per hour each way? I could be wrong though.
 

positron

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2023
Messages
254
Location
Cardiff
I'm assuming it's useful for service recovery in the event of disruption, even if it isn't intended to be used all the time (not sure whether it is or not). Probably especially useful to have options on the Aberdare line given the aspirations to extend it to Hirwaun. Those plans do seem to have gone very quiet in recent times, feels like the Welsh government could have avoided some of the moaning with Cardiff cross rail if they had also backed the Hirwaun extension too..
 

Tomos y Tanc

Member
Joined
1 Jul 2019
Messages
733
Just a quick question. One of the reasons TfW give for the current closures is to remove the old footbridge at Treforest. The press release says it's been donated to a heritage railway. Out of interest, does anyone know which one? The release doesn't say but I guess the Pontypool & Blaenavon could do with one for Blaenavon (HL).
 

Top