Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
DRT being demand responsive transport...?
That's the one yes, sorry, post edited.
DRT being demand responsive transport...?
I believe through ticketing is unlikely due to stagecoach not operating the trains. Also Great Northern serve CMB.I'm strongly in favour of this. It should run all day timed to connect in and out of the Liverpool Street trains that terminate/start at Cambridge North.
But the key feature needs to be through ticketing that lets bus passengers use the trains between Cambridge North, Cambridge and Cambridge South.
It would then also be of use to Biomedical Campus commuters, Papworth outpatients and Hills Road and Long Road sixth form college students, having a 10 minute train ride across Cambridge instead of being stuck in Cambridge traffic.
The opening of Cambridge South station will be the ideal time to launch this.
As someone who spent 90 minutes on the A today between Histon and Addenbrookes, I can't help but agree.I'm strongly in favour of this. It should run all day timed to connect in and out of the Liverpool Street trains that terminate/start at Cambridge North.
But the key feature needs to be through ticketing that lets bus passengers use the trains between Cambridge North, Cambridge and Cambridge South.
It would then also be of use to Biomedical Campus commuters, Papworth outpatients and Hills Road and Long Road sixth form college students, having a 10 minute train ride across Cambridge instead of being stuck in Cambridge traffic.
The opening of Cambridge South station will be the ideal time to launch this.
I'm not sure reliable timetables are possible, given the variablity of Cambridge congestion, not to mention very variable dwell times. The only way would be to add an absurd amount of slack into the timetable.Also a single fare is £2 or £1 for u25s and negate the need to pay for the train. I agree the traffic is bad and stagecoach should produce timetables they can reliably run to and CPCA should improve congestion (easier said than done).
It isn't a matter for Stagecoach. The Cambridge and Peterborough Combined Authority should take the lead but there's no evidence that they are even aware of the opportunity that Cambridge South opens up for improving public transport in Cambridge. If Andy Burnham can do what he is doing in Manchester then, Nik Johnson. or his successor, can do something, on a much smaller scale, in Cambridge.I believe through ticketing is unlikely due to stagecoach not operating the trains. Also Great Northern serve CMB.
If the bus stays on the busway then the risk to punctuality for the bus is very small.I believe that passengers have a negative perception of public transport performance and so timed bus-train connections may be missed due lack of punctuality.
I agree the traffic is bad and stagecoach should produce timetables they can reliably run to
I'm not sure reliable timetables are possible, given the variablity of Cambridge congestion, not to mention very variable dwell times.
That has already happened. Look at evening peak timetables on various routes. A knock on effect of increased slack is reduced frequency.The only way would be to add an absurd amount of slack into the timetable.
Yesterday was a classic example of weather related congestion. When there is heavy rain in Cambridge there is a big modal shift from cycling to buses and cars.As someone who spent 90 minutes on the A today between Histon and Addenbrookes, I can't help but agree.
On Sunday, October 27th, we're making changes to some of our services in Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire, and Cambridgeshire
These changes are designed to improve connectivity and punctuality by expanding services, increasing frequency, and adjusting timetables.
Why should Stagecoach invest when they may not have a business there with franchising.No one is willing to take the risk on buses these days.Controversial opinion perhaps, but given that the Busway must be among Stagecoach East's most successful routes, maybe they should just put their hand in their pocket and not rely on CAPCA to pay them to run a half decent service?
Why should Stagecoach invest when they may not have a business there with franchising.No one is willing to take the risk on buses these days.
The Cambus-liveried MMC 10802 was parked in Peterborough bus station yesterday, for no obvious reason.
A bus company is celebrating serving part of the East of England for 40 years.
Stagecoast East began life in 1984 as Cambus, which is still the legal name for the company running its buses Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.
To mark the anniversary, parties have been held for staff at its three Cambridgeshire depots - Cambridge, Fenstanton, and Peterborough - as well as its depot in Bedford.
[...]
Meanwhile a meeting of the Council’s Rural Affairs Committee on Monday evening received the much anticipated “Bus Services: Review of Rural Funded Provision” report which recommended the following:
Service 25: Bedford – Harrold – Hinwick or Souldrop/Knotting – Wymington – Rushden
• Much of the requirement between Harrold, Carlton, Pavenham and Bedford, will be met by the Grant Palmer commercial service. Therefore, it would be possible to procure a more limited service to fill the gaps around the commercial service, either times or to serve those villages not otherwise served. This would optimise the number of vehicles required from 2 to 1 over current arrangements.
• There may also be scope to work with North Northamptonshire Council to jointly provide a service covering the Wymington area.
This encouraging confirms the wasteful competition will be coming to an end and Grant Palmer’s commercial initiative with route 25 can continue to prosper. And who knows, if the company is successful in gaining the tender for the one bus operating journeys to Rushden the service might end up integrated together again.
Along with many other changes to local routes too.The 51 has been deregistered and will cease to operate after 26 July.
They've posted a service update stating they are chucking the 9 (Ely) in from AugustBustimes.org shows three new routes have been registered in Cambridge from 27 May:
T2 (Madingley Rd P&R - Newmarket Rd P&R)
T3 (Grantchester- Fulbourn)
T4 (Addenbrookes - Newmarket Bus Station)
Whippet also seems to have registered a T1 (Cambridge - Huntingdon via Fenstanton)
They haven't been mentioned anywhere official yet - presumably these are CPCA-funded routes and they can't be publicised until purdah has finished after the local elections.
Maybe we will get a better tendered service. Stagecoach with some help from long running roadworks managed to kill route 9.
I can't find these on the Stagecoach East page of bustimes.Bustimes.org shows three new routes have been registered in Cambridge from 27 May:
T2 (Madingley Rd P&R - Newmarket Rd P&R)
T3 (Grantchester- Fulbourn)
T4 (Addenbrookes - Newmarket Bus Station)
Whippet also seems to have registered a T1 (Cambridge - Huntingdon via Fenstanton)
Waterbeach is served by the PR5 and Milton by the 2. They have been decoupled from the Ely service.Hopefully it can return to Waterbeach and Milton
CPCA is the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority. The outgoing CPCA mayor is proposing to move towards franchising, but they are not standing for re-election and the way forward will depend on who wins next Thursday (result is expected Friday afternoon).They haven't been mentioned anywhere official yet - presumably these are CPCA-funded routes and they can't be publicised until purdah has finished after the local elections.
I can't find these on the Stagecoach East page of bustimes.
But I can find this on the Whippet page:
Thanks, I'd not looked at that before.The timetables are not up as of yet but there registrations are' https://bustimes.org/licences/PF0000459
Thanks, I'd not looked at that before.
Is there anything that sets out the routes please?
Neither the PR5 or 2 are useful for journeys between Waterbeach and Milton. It was a puzzling decision to cut the 9 from both as it was a fairly well-used part of the route that didn't have to contend with competition with the railway.Waterbeach is served by the PR5 and Milton by the 2. They have been decoupled from the Ely service.
For all of Ely, Newmarket and Royston, the bus is struggling to compete with the train for traffic to and from Cambridge. Rail's advantage will increase next year when Cambridge South opens.
And the decision to leave a place the size of Waterbeach with effectively one bus a day Mondays to Fridays only to a supermarket (the 19A to Tesco Newmarket Rd) is one that amazes me to this dayNeither the PR5 or 2 are useful for journeys between Waterbeach and Milton. It was a puzzling decision to cut the 9 from both as it was a fairly well-used part of the route that didn't have to contend with competition with the railway.
Thanks.This future bus network map from the CPCA shows all the new Tiger routes
Neither the PR5 or 2 are useful for journeys between Waterbeach and Milton.
Neither are big flows in comparison to flows to and from various parts of Cambridge. Stagecoach has better things to do with limited resources.And the decision to leave a place the size of Waterbeach with effectively one bus a day Mondays to Fridays only to a supermarket (the 19A to Tesco Newmarket Rd) is one that amazes me to this day
Neither are big flows in comparison to flows to and from various parts of Cambridge. Stagecoach has better things to do with limited resources.