Ah, so only for that 'short' section. I'd imagine the gap will widen the greater the distance.The "Pretendolino" Mk3 set (110 and poor acceleration) only typically lost 2-3 minutes between Euston and MKC on 390 timings, if that is any help.
Ah, so only for that 'short' section. I'd imagine the gap will widen the greater the distance.The "Pretendolino" Mk3 set (110 and poor acceleration) only typically lost 2-3 minutes between Euston and MKC on 390 timings, if that is any help.
Ah, so only for that 'short' section. I'd imagine the gap will widen the greater the distance.
MK is half way between London and Brum, so worst case that's 6 minutes. The 80x's superior acceleration will reduce that a bit, too.
Not to mention quicker dispatches with sliding doors that could, if they got the agreement from the unions be operated by the driver only, reducing dwell times.MK is half way between London and Brum, so worst case that's 6 minutes. The 80x's superior acceleration will reduce that a bit, too.
I was more referring to however far north they end up going.MK is half way between London and Brum, so worst case that's 6 minutes. The 80x's superior acceleration will reduce that a bit, too.
Not past Weaver Jn on the WCML proper. Some of the earlier modelling I was shown with the non tilt line speed increases had them 2 minutes slower to Rugby with a MK call. All could have changed since.I was more referring to however far north they end up going.
Also line speed maximum is 125 with or without stations !If it's that close in speed to the Pendolino's, I'll eat my hat. The IETs might have acceleration, but the Pendolino has momentum. Only thing that stops it at 125 is stations (which includes stations entrances and exits just so we are clear).
MK is half way between London and Brum, so worst case that's 6 minutes. The 80x's superior acceleration will reduce that a bit, too.