Mcr Warrior
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 11,920
Think that this ship may have sailed already, judging by other posts on this particular thread.I assume this is sarcastic, as it's an utterly unworkable suggestion!
Think that this ship may have sailed already, judging by other posts on this particular thread.I assume this is sarcastic, as it's an utterly unworkable suggestion!
If you read #266, someone did not even like people sitting behind them.Do I take it from these comments that some people don't want people to sit next to them, look at them, speak to anyone, eat anything, use any electronic device or move around the train? If so, their best solution might be to buy a car.
I would much rather the makeup be applied at the seat than having all the toilets engaged for the last 15 minutes of the journey.I can't see how it hurts anyone else for someone to be applying makeup!
That's different because smoking directly affects the physical health of others. Most of the other examples are just personal preferences/minor irritants.It depends on your definition of Social Etiquette I suppose. the Smoking ban is one example of legislation I was thinking of.
Well said. I don't know why some of the people complaining here use public transport.I understand many of the expectations for basic decency (don't be obnoxiously loud, don't take calls of a private nature or play loud audio from a device, don't stink out the coach, don't litter etc...).
On the other hand, some of the posts on here suggest that some people think the railway is a private chaffeur service for adult (18+) working businesspeople and middle-class leisure travellers and that anything other than sitting silently, away from others, typing quietly on a laptop or staring out of the window (don't even think about talking to someone or even sitting near them, you must always sit as far as humanly possible from others to be 'considerate') is utterly unacceptable and should be an arrestable offence.
It's public transport. People will use it for family days out (kids make noise, they're kids), drinking days (even the dreaded hen parties. The railway is an excellent alternative to driving so everyone can enjoy a few drinks on a day out. Can't believe the number of suggestions that this should be outlawed!) and people will make phonecalls (should people not make phonecalls outside in the street as it's noise pollution? What about in a shop? Public spaces are noisy - it's life. Do it in the vestibule if you can, but some people seem to want to hire the sound police with decibel readers and arrest those who breach the silent ambience they desire).
Short of buying a private suite on an Emirates A380, public transport is going to be noisy, deal with it.
Think it was about 10-15 minutes - usually achievable with a bike!How long did you have between connections, bearing in mind the minimum interchange time is 30 minutes between Queen Street and Central?
So much this.I'd rather someone was having a conversation "of a private nature", be it business or, as I often hear, people updating other family members about a relative who is in hospital, rather than the inane giggling chit chat that some (usually) young ladies are having, often for the entire duration of their journey. They have no recognition that they sound like simpletons.
This is extremely judgemental and also likely misogynistic. I think I would rather sound like a simpleton than look like someone who sits on trains judging others as "simpletons" for making enjoyable conversation!inane giggling chit chat that some (usually) young ladies are having, often for the entire duration of their journey. They have no recognition that they sound like simpletons.
I'd rather someone was having a conversation "of a private nature", be it business or, as I often hear, people updating other family members about a relative who is in hospital, rather than the inane giggling chit chat that some (usually) young ladies are having, often for the entire duration of their journey. They have no recognition that they sound like simpletons.
I'm with @trainophile here. @Kilopylae is of course being equally "judgemental".This is extremely judgemental and also likely misogynistic. I think I would rather sound like a simpleton than look like someone who sits on trains judging others as "simpletons" for making enjoyable conversation!
There are plenty more stinky things consumed on trains than egg sandwiches!
No just any that might try to regulate social etiquette, and potentially criminalise perfectly harmless behaviours on the basis that they might irritate some members of these forums.Do you think the same about every law coming out of Westminster then?
This is extremely judgemental and also likely misogynistic. I think I would rather sound like a simpleton than look like someone who sits on trains judging others as "simpletons" for making enjoyable conversation!
Perhaps a "no children on trains after 7pm" rule, like some pubs and restaurants have?
Get off the train as soon as possible after it stops.On the tube, when you board and the tube is busy, don't just stop by the door, move away from the door(s), other people might want to get on after you.
Saw that a few times today when in London, someone boards and just stops even though passengers are still trying to get on afterwards
Depends if someone is blocking a seat with their bag or not. I'll go out of my way to sit where that bag was, even if there are 20 other spare seats, to make a point.Who agrees with not sitting next to someone if there are plenty of double seats in the carriage?
Indeed. Often a useful way of readily getting a seat on a busy commuter service when the 20 spare seats might be randomly spread along the length of a 12 car unit.Depends if someone is blocking a seat with their bag or not. I'll go out of my way to sit where that bag was, even if there are 20 other spare seats, to make a point.
Someone taking up a seat with a bag on a busy train? I agree. Someone doing so on an almost empty train? Frankly, you are being an AH if you do that then.Depends if someone is blocking a seat with their bag or not. I'll go out of my way to sit where that bag was, even if there are 20 other spare seats, to make a point.
Depends if someone is blocking a seat with their bag or not. I'll go out of my way to sit where that bag was, even if there are 20 other spare seats, to make a point.
Depends if someone is blocking a seat with their bag or not. I'll go out of my way to sit where that bag was, even if there are 20 other spare seats, to make a point.
Someone taking up a seat with a bag on a busy train? I agree. Someone doing so on an almost empty train? Frankly, you are being an AH if you do that then.
"Would you mind moving your bag please? Can I help you?We don't know the person's circumstances. Perhaps they can't manage to get their bag or case into the overhead racks, or are worried they won't be able to get it down again. If the luggage racks are full what are they supposed to do?
Again, fair enough on a busy services where there is a shortage of seats, but totally absurd when the carriage is half empty."Would you mind moving your bag please? Can I help you?