The Planner
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 15,963
There is a push to get Kings Norton upgraded.
There is a "push" none of which is funded etc... and would not be ready in time for the Camp Hill stations to be open. The issue is with the terminating trains and Bromsgrove/Redditch trains. You cannot reliably terminate them there in between 6tph. If you sent the Cross City through P3, then yes, that would help massively providing there isnt a XC up your backside.If hypothetically the central platforms were reinstated with full electrification through the station, would this provide the additional flexibility? Say if the southbound cross-city services ran through what would be the new platform 2 before switching to the down slow, whilst the Camp Hill services terminated in the new platform 4 (current P2), or it is the conflict with the current moves across the junction that is problematic?
The plan is currently 2tph from New St to Kings Norton all stations.I presume that you are refering to conflicts at Kings Norton. My understanding from information given by WMCA a year or so ago is that the present Worcester/Malvern trains will no longer call at University but will be diverted via the Camp Hill Line to serve the new stations. This was a compromise to avoid having to build the new curves at Bordesley into Moor Street. I personally do not think that will work because passengers for stations beyond Bromsgrove wiil have to compete with local traffic on the Camp Hill Line to get on their trains. In the longer term, although Covid might have changed projections, I think that the demand for the Camp Hill service will build up requiring more than 2tph.
Last edited: