• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Varamis Rail Given Operators Licence from ORR

Glasgowbusguy

On Moderation
Joined
21 Feb 2019
Messages
419
Wonder how loaded the trains have been, I guess we need to wait a month or 2 for it to settle down and see how full it gets
Glasgow central has all the infrastructure I place and even still has red star branding in some of the undercroft it is show on the station tour
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,243
Location
DTOS A or B
Platform 1 at Birmingham International has access from the road for loading unloading, the other platforms don't. Imagine a train was left their for a reason or signaller put it into the wrong platform. I am sure it won't happen again.
Further down the tweet in the replies, it was said it was a LNWR/WMT train. Put there due to the strikes.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
16,113
Location
East Anglia
Varamis where slating I suppose NR for the very tardy schedule the other day & nigh on 7hr journey time which is uncompetitive.

Average speed was 42mph!!

“If the relevant authorities don’t get on board with us, this will unfortunately go nowhere, will be a huge own goal and it will be the sole fault of the railway. @railandroad @transportgovuk @networkrail

#Decarbonisation
#GetOnBoard”
 
Last edited:

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,045
Varamis where slating I suppose NR for the very tardy schedule the other day & nigh on 7hr journey time which is uncompetitive.

Average speed was 42mph!!

“If the relevant authorities don’t get on board with us, this will unfortunately go nowhere, will be a huge own goal and it will be the sole fault of the railway. @railandroad @transportgovuk @networkrail

#Decarbonisation
#GetOnBoard”
Bit cheeky, they can always rebid a path they think is compliant and is quicker.
 

Freightmaster

Established Member
Joined
7 Jul 2009
Messages
3,499
Yes, & going by RTT this week it’s good to see it now appears to be back on a regular nightly schedule
That's all well and good, but what will happen in a couple of weeks time when Carstairs is completely
blocked to all traffic for a fortnight??


I understand that DB will be 'dragging' a couple of their Shieldmuir EMU workings via the G+SW,
but Varamis don't have any locos (or drivers with the requisite route knowledge) to be able to do
that, so presumably the working will have to be suspended altogether for two weeks; will they be
blaming the "relevant authorities" for that, too?




MARK
 

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
2,345
Location
belfast
That's all well and good, but what will happen in a couple of weeks time when Carstairs is completely
blocked to all traffic for a fortnight??


I understand that DB will be 'dragging' a couple of their Shieldmuir EMU workings via the G+SW,
but Varamis don't have any locos (or drivers with the requisite route knowledge) to be able to do
that, so presumably the working will have to be suspended altogether for two weeks?




MARK
Potentially they will hire in another FOC to drag their EMUs?
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
2,794
The likelihood is they won't get or keep many customers anyway. They are already making their excuses for why the project is going to fail. The standard railway excuse for failure - it's all somebody else's fault.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,204
That's all well and good, but what will happen in a couple of weeks time when Carstairs is completely
blocked to all traffic for a fortnight??


I understand that DB will be 'dragging' a couple of their Shieldmuir EMU workings via the G+SW,
but Varamis don't have any locos (or drivers with the requisite route knowledge) to be able to do
that, so presumably the working will have to be suspended altogether for two weeks; will they be
blaming the "relevant authorities" for that, too?




MARK
Can't they get a local freight operator to drag their services to the ECML?
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
2,794
Can't they get a local freight operator to drag their services to the ECML?
They wouldn't need the unit dragging to the ECML. Mossend - Edinburgh is electrified. Once on the ECML how would an EMU reach Birmingham other than running to London and back? If they complain about a 7 hour journey they wouldn't be too happy about Galsgow - London - Birmingham.
 

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
2,345
Location
belfast
They wouldn't need the unit dragging to the ECML. Mossend - Edinburgh is electrified. Once on the ECML how would an EMU reach Birmingham other than running to London and back? If they complain about a 7 hour journey they wouldn't be too happy about Galsgow - London - Birmingham.
I am assuming the dragging was meant as across from the ECML to birmingham, instead of going via london.

I can imagine them taking a small loss on some services around engineering works by dragging them over the unelectrifed bits of the diversion. Because to build parcels custom reliability is undoubtedly important
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
2,794
It wouldn't be a small loss. The margins on this sort of traffic would be wafer thin at best and a massive uphill struggle to even achieve that.

Why do you think ROG gave up on their aspirations for similar traffic or none of the big players in railfreight have even tried win this traffic? GBRf mooted the idea of converting redundant HSTs for high speed logistic services but didn't in the end, the EWS parcels service to Walsall ended years ago and nobody has tried to resurrect anything since.
 

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
2,345
Location
belfast
It wouldn't be a small loss. The margins on this sort of traffic would be wafer thin at best and a massive uphill struggle to even achieve that.

Why do you think ROG gave up on their aspirations for similar traffic or none of the big players in railfreight have even tried win this traffic? GBRf mooted the idea of converting redundant HSTs for high speed logistic services but didn't in the end, the EWS parcels service to Walsall ended years ago and nobody has tried to resurrect anything since.
Are you someone with insider knowledge (whether from being involved with varamis, ROG, network rail, another FOC, or some other source), or an enthusiast speculating from an outsider perspective?
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,045
Are you someone with insider knowledge (whether from being involved with varamis, ROG, network rail, another FOC, or some other source), or an enthusiast speculating from an outsider perspective?
Freight in general is wafer thin, a couple of extra boxes on an Intermodal makes a big difference. Hence trying to get 775m trains on the network. Dragging a unit around the houses will make a significant dent in the margins of a single train.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,204
They wouldn't need the unit dragging to the ECML. Mossend - Edinburgh is electrified. Once on the ECML how would an EMU reach Birmingham other than running to London and back? If they complain about a 7 hour journey they wouldn't be too happy about Galsgow - London - Birmingham.
I was talking about during the WCML blockades round Carstairs and Preston.
Drag Bham International to Peterborough, then straight up to Mossend.

That is one hell of a diversion to get to Birmingham International!
When Carstairs/Preston are blocked, what other options do they have? G&SW and S&C combined would be more miles on diesel than Brum to Peterborough surely?
Or you could drag from Man Victoria to Leeds and do it that way?
 

Suraggu

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
964
Location
The Far North
Network Rail will surely compensate even if a token amount due to the disruption such a huge blockade even if operators have had plenty of notice to amend plans and such.

Even to haul a single EMU from Carlisle to Mossend and back 5 days a week on a route with limited paths is surely going to be a 4 figure sum each day and when your profit margin on traffic such as parcels is at best razor thin running at a loss for two weeks is going to hurt.
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,141
Network Rail will surely compensate even if a token amount due to the disruption such a huge blockade even if operators have had plenty of notice to amend plans and such.
Politicians claim they want increased private sector involvement & investment in rail but going by these posts it only realistic for the very rich or large & already well established players .
 
Last edited:

172007

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2021
Messages
746
Location
West Mids
Ran last night but judging by very speedy turnaround the service was empty.

I immagine Veramis would have requested 100mph paths but were rejected or is it Network Rail can only offer slow paths.

Does the service get signal checked anywhere, I know the up service awaits an Avanti at Beatock by the looks of it.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,045
Ran last night but judging by very speedy turnaround the service was empty.

I immagine Veramis would have requested 100mph paths but were rejected or is it Network Rail can only offer slow paths.

Does the service get signal checked anywhere, I know the up service awaits an Avanti at Beatock by the looks of it.
The return service follows a DRS nuclear service north of Crewe, which clearly has stronger rights, as I reckon it could be fettled.
 

172007

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2021
Messages
746
Location
West Mids
I suspect Veramis want faster paths as one driver could do the outward and return legs with a margin thinking about it.
 

Top