edwin_m
Veteran Member
Indeed. Newcastle-Ashington is a very different case...Do not confuse matters by making reference to anything north of Hadrians Wall when discussing the subject of this thread.
Indeed. Newcastle-Ashington is a very different case...Do not confuse matters by making reference to anything north of Hadrians Wall when discussing the subject of this thread.
Skipton - Colne has a near iconic status largely because of the unstinting efforts of SELRAP - and good for them. And if it had not ever closed, then it's hard to see anyone suggesting that it should be closed and lifted now.
But it did close, and @Bald Rick 's suggestion of a £400m bill in 2020 pounds doesn't seem unreasonable, which then begs other questions. Is it the right answer to "where's the best place in the UK to spend an incremental £400m on rail?" or even "where's the best place in the NW of England to spend an incremental £400m on rail?". This also doesn't mean it won't happen - BordersRail exists for purely political ends, and if Skipton - Colne could be a quick win (ie, could construction get underway before 2024?) then it may happen. If you want it, lobby your MPs.
There is no chance, none whatsoever, of construction starting by 2024. There would need to be at least 2-3 years of feasibility, development and early design, then another 2-3 years of planning and consents. And then a year post consent for all the pre-construction activities (detail design amendments as a result fo the consents process, land assembly, environmental mitigation, etc). And that all assumes someone has their chequebook open, now, which they don’t, and that it all goes without a hitch, which it won’t.*
*of course it can’t go without a hitch anyway, as it’s not going to happen.
There is no chance, none whatsoever, of construction starting by 2024. There would need to be at least 2-3 years of feasibility, development and early design, then another 2-3 years of planning and consents. And then a year post consent for all the pre-construction activities (detail design amendments as a result fo the consents process, land assembly, environmental mitigation, etc). And that all assumes someone has their chequebook open, now, which they don’t, and that it all goes without a hitch, which it won’t.*
*of course it can’t go without a hitch anyway, as it’s not going to happen.
I agree with all of that, and since the cynic in me says the DfT will be looking for things to reopen in "the North" before a 2023 or 2024 election, then.... they will have to look elsewhere. It does beg the question of what will be done (because something will have to be...) if there's very little in the development pipeline with the "right" geography -- I'd thought that Skipton - Colne was further along than "nothing".