• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Words and phrases recently introduced into the English language.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Acey

Member
Joined
16 Nov 2018
Messages
255
I liked Cosplay in the early days but their last couple of albums are naff :lol:
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

simonw

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2009
Messages
796
How about using the word "shop" when they mean "buy"? Adverts will often invite me to "Shop our new range of xxx". Possibly it's because many people now treat shopping as a leisure activity in its own right but buying something is more directly associated with the painful bit of actually paying.
Because buy means to purchase whereas shop means to browse as well as to purchase.
 

Dr Day

Member
Joined
16 Oct 2018
Messages
545
Location
Bristol
For some reason I can cope with 'text' being both a verb and a noun eg 'can you text me later?' as well as 'I sent a text' but it grates using the word 'message' as a verb eg 'can you message me later?'
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,343
It is strange / irritating/ incorrect use of grammar, rather than words, that I often find to be irritating.

e.g.

The train arriving TO Platform 5. (Some station announcers)
(it is arriving at a platform)

Moneybags United suffered a defeat TO Crewe Alexandra. (Seems to be getting common on TV & Radio)
(they were defeated BY Crewe)

The organisation is headed UP by Mr/Mrs X.(All too common)
(The "up" is totally unnecessary; "led by" would be shorter and more accurate.)

Starting OFF ON the Motorways (Radio Traffic News).
"Off / on" are contradictory; starting "with" the motorways would be more accurate.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,272
Location
St Albans
Starting OFF ON the Motorways (Radio Traffic News).
"Off / on" are contradictory; starting "with" the motorways would be more accurate.
Every time somebody said that they were going to go somewhere, my late MiL would ask whether they were going twice.
There's one of those in post #117 of this thread.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,679
Location
Another planet...
The Americanism that gets on my wick at the moment is how they pronounce the word "divisive". The ÷ key on your calculator is "divide" not "divid". <(
 

simonw

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2009
Messages
796
Every time somebody said that they were going to go somewhere, my late MiL would ask whether they were going twice.
There's one of those in post #117 of this thread.
going to present tense.

Going to go future tense
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
5,100
Not new, and in fact not even at the peak of its usage. Perfectly cromulent grammar:
Good reply... I had to look that up: https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/what-does-cromulent-mean

There are plenty of TV catchphrases that have seeped into our lexical consciousness, but none of them has been as sly as cromulent.
Cromulent first appeared in the February 18, 1996 episode of The Simpsons called "Lisa the Iconoclast," in what could be considered a throw-away line given during the opening credits. The schoolchildren of Springfield are watching a film about the founding father of Springfield, Jebediah Springfield. The film ends with Jebediah intoning, “A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man.” One teacher at the back of the room leans over to another and says that she’d never heard the word embiggen before she moved to Springfield. “I don't know why,” the other teacher replies. “It's a perfectly cromulent word.”

Though 'cromulent' originated as a joke on The Simpsons, it's a perfectly cromulent candidate for future entry in the dictionary.

The word cromulent ended up in the script courtesy of a showrunner’s challenge to the writers. According to the DVD commentary for The Simpsons, the showrunners asked the writers to come up with two nonce words that sounded like words that could be in actual use. Writer David X. Cohen came up with cromulent as one of those words. It means "acceptable" or "fine."
The joke was so sly and subtle that as "It's a perfectly cromulent word" was repeated, it wasn't necessarily clear to the hearer that it was a joke.
 

joebassman

Member
Joined
5 Mar 2020
Messages
166
Location
Stowupland
Bruv

Thats one often used by younsters who feel the need to talk in African American and Caribbean accents that is popular now days.
 

Purple Train

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2022
Messages
1,496
Location
Darkest Commuterland
"Unique" now seems to be, in some quarters at least, considered to be equivalent to "unusual", which grates somewhat.
One I'm less sure on is the use of "-phobic", which, to me, should only be used in the context of a strong hatred or a fear, but seems to have crept into a more general usage - but then I'm probably wrong on my original interpretation of it, so could anyone put me right on this issue?
 

Gloster

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
8,438
Location
Up the creek
"Unique" now seems to be, in some quarters at least, considered to be equivalent to "unusual", which grates somewhat.

Yes. The misuse of ‘unique’ annoys me. Unique is an absolute: something is unique if it the only one with such qualities. If there are others, even only one, then it is (very) rare, but not unique. Something can be be close to being unique: if it had slightly different qualities it might be unique, but as it is it is not unique if there others.
 

Calthrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2015
Messages
3,305
Yes. The misuse of ‘unique’ annoys me. Unique is an absolute: something is unique if it the only one with such qualities. If there are others, even only one, then it is (very) rare, but not unique. Something can be be close to being unique: if it had slightly different qualities it might be unique, but as it is it is not unique if there others.

I'll submit -- just to be annoying -- the following from a song in the musical My Fair Lady -- first produced in 1956 -- and set shortly pre-World War I !

"Why can't the English teach their children how to speak?
This verbal class distinction must by now be quite unique ..."

Will readily admit, however, that re any fictional work in any mode -- "poetic licence" excuses most things; in / concerning, no matter what era.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,895
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Lol

I've actually heard people say this instead of laughing.

Often ironic, when the thing being laughed at is only funny because it's so awful or pathetic.

I've never heard one say it but I've heard plenty of youngsters here say it in a fake African American accent

It certainly does seem to be the case that chavs in the London area speak with an accent with a measure of African/Caribbean influence rather than just classic Cockney as they used to or even Estuary English which is kind of a lazier form of Cockney/Mockney. I'm not sure if that's good or bad - good because it's "anti-racist", bad because it's associating that accent with antisocial behaviour and low level crime.

I don't think "I iz a chav innit bruv" (a phrase I used to throw at my Scouts if they used that sort of street language in my presence, which made them utterly cringe) is specifically associated to the African/Caribbean communities.
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
8,160
Location
SE London
Yes. The misuse of ‘unique’ annoys me. Unique is an absolute: something is unique if it the only one with such qualities. If there are others, even only one, then it is (very) rare, but not unique. Something can be be close to being unique: if it had slightly different qualities it might be unique, but as it is it is not unique if there others.

I have to admit I've not encountered 'unique' being used in that way, but that seems to me like part of a general trend where words that have very strong meanings are getting 'dumbed down' by being used to refer to much weaker things. I suspect it's usually because people try to use them for dramatic effect or in order to emphasise (political) points they are making, and you then end up with the word being over-used and its meaning therefore getting weakened.

Other examples would be 'horrific' used to describe things that are really just annoyances or inconveniences. Earlier in the thread I mentioned 'traumatised'. @Purple Train 's example of -phobic being frequently misused. And we're starting to see the same thing with 'misogynistic' being used (especially in political circles) to describe anything where women might be being disadvantaged - despite the actual meaning being to do with hating women. At the risk of getting politically controversial, I'd say in the last few years we've started to see the word 'racism' go the same way.
 

joebassman

Member
Joined
5 Mar 2020
Messages
166
Location
Stowupland
A childist was a new one I heard the other day.

Though it was Piers Morgan who was being accused of it.

Apparently according to the one speaking it, it means someone who doesn't believe a child should decide their own rules and get to decide for themselves what identity they are.
 

Gloster

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
8,438
Location
Up the creek
I was delayed in the supermarket today (by two old ladies who got their trolleys jammed together as they tried to get past each other at a pinch point) and found myself staring at the cheap ‘Let’s learn the alphabet/numbers’ type of books. I realised that, based on the cover pictures, these all seem to be American. I bet they say ‘Zee’ (and other transatlanticisms).
 

Gloster

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
8,438
Location
Up the creek
How long has ‘redacted’ been in common use. Not many years ago it was a word that you only occasionally came across, but now it keeps on appearing. Are documents more easily available than they used to be or is the blanking out of details becoming more common? Was it one particular report that changed everything: possibly the Iraq dodgy dossier enquiry?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top