Both the T11 and T12 are shown on the TrawsCymru route map as 'TrawsCymru Connect' services (although other pages on the website do describe them without the word 'connect').
you cannot make that accusation against the T11 and T12 if they are indeed advertised as 'TrawsCymru Connect' and not just 'TrawsCymru'. It is the latter brand that should be a network of long distance bus services.
I don't know much about the other two services, but for the T11 I would suggest that no research was necessary.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if this was a case of service cuts beng threatened and the Welsh Government stepping in with the money to keep it running, but wanting to put their own brand on it so highlight their involvement.
the conversion and linking of existing services, doesn't compete with rail, and opens up a number of through links that wouldn't be possible to form a long distance service. Unless you know what the previous passenger figures were for the previous service, we cannot say what the effect, positive or negative, of the T12 is
So two trips over two years ago has brought you to your answer? The T12 is busy enough for a rural service
many use the T12 from Welshpool to travel to Gobowen train station as it's preferable to using the train.
As a driver of the T12 it is busier than when it used to be the X85, interesting travel patterns of Caersws to Oswestry and Wrexham have become regular
Chirk to Wrexham has become busier than ever post Lockdown with +10 passengers per journey picked up in Chirk alone now commonplace
The basic problem with any discussion on Trawscymru is the lack of published information on research on new routes, service reliability and passenger numbers. There is no way to measure success of the network without this information, which the Welsh Government are not publishing.
In terms of passenger numbers on the T12 I am far more likely to take the evidence of a bus driver who drives the T12 route than someone who simply knows the T12 route is busier and that passengers are travelling from Welshpool to Gobowen to catch the Train.
The bus driver mentions the travel patterns from Caerswys to Oswestry/Wrexham which is interesting as those passengers have a long journey with the T12 diversions particularly through Montgomery, which is regularly gridlocked.
However in the final analysis the only way to show the patronage of the T12 is by publication of the passenger figures and this also applies to all the other Trawscymru services whether they be Trawscymru or Trawscymru Connect.
In relation to Trawscymru Connect the local bus services that have been used to form the Trawscymru Connect service were in fact already connecting with the Trawscymru network. The T11 was a combination of 2 services which both connected with the T5 at different places in Haverfordwest and Fishguard. The 3 local bus services that formed the T12 would also have presumably connected with the existing Trawscymru network before rebranding.
You would expect that local bus services would connect with the Trawscymru Network. Public transport services whether train or bus should be connected. The X28 could be seen as a connection Between the Trawscymru T1/T5 services and the T12 Trawscymru Connect service.
The Trawscymru Connect is a flawed concept as the aim of all transport services should be to optimise, as far as possible, to connect with the Trawscymru Long Distance network.
The Welsh Government only distinguish between Trawscymru and Trawscymru Connect by name. In publicity they refer to the success of the Trawscymru network. I have not seen any publicity about the success of Trawscymru Connect as a separate brand or comparative passenger figures before and after the rebranding of services as Trawscymru Connect.
The rebranding as Trawscymru Connect does absolutely nothing to attract more passengers onto the Trawscymru network. The same passengers that used the Local bus services before rebranding use the Trawscymru Connect service. The only difference is that the Welsh Government provide funding directly and not via the Council funding for the Local services. However what it does do is increase the number of passengers using the "Trawscymru network" and allow the claim that passenger numbers are increasing on the Trawscymru long distance network, which is misleading if not incorrect .
The argument on the thread that Trawscymru long distance services can only be put in place where there is an existing bus service/passenger demand and on a route which does not compete with rail (for example T3) is also flawed.
The train network in Wales is totally inadequate. Public transport between major cities and towns is inadequate. Trawscymru long distance services are essential and should be direct services between the major cities and towns, fed by local bus services . This requires a major piece of research on traffic flows to determine where those routes are. It is not good enough to say there has been no demand or no routes there in the past.
The only way cars will be removed from the roads is by an efficient network of direct long distance Trawscymru services where all local bus services are designed to feed into the network.