For me it slashes commuter costs in half.
The Austrian Klimaticket slashed my commuter costs by 50% and in addition gave me free travel in all of Austria (including RJ/IC etc) instead of just the city of Vienna and my regular rail line to work in a regional city close to Vienna.
In this, I think all these schemes are misguided. I don’t know your financial situation, but I could well afford the former price.
If someone can’t afford it, help them with social payments, but don’t subsidize those that are well-off.
I am all for affordable public-transport, but the general focus should not be a social one (that is the role of social policy), but a modal shift one, to encourage people to switch from cars.
The great advantage of these „all transport included“ tickets is that it saves all the hassle of even thinking what kind of ticket I need for any individual journey. That in itself is extremely attractive and efficient.
But that advantage does not depend on having a dirt-cheap ticket.
A nation-wide ticket should be significantly cheaper than using the car for someone who regularly needs to undertake journeys across the *country*.
A regional ticket should be significantly cheaper than using the car for someone who regularly needs to undertake journeys across the *region*.
And same for city tickets…
But a national ticket does not need to be significantly cheaper than regional car travel. That is not necesssry to encourage a switch to public transport for those regional journeys; all it does is to encourage to undertake journeys that would not have been done at all where it not for that cheap ticket. And that is of no use for modal switch or for the climate.
<rant over>