Whistler40145
Established Member
Well...the Captain hasn't made sufficient runs in this series, how long is this to continue?
As far as I am concerned, the batting slump shown above after such a good start in the England first innings, where the last seven wickets then only added a further 54 runs, was the reason why England lost this match. They should have gone on to post a total of 500+ in their first innings.
Well...the Captain hasn't made sufficient runs in this series, how long is this to continue?
Glued to the TV today, initially I was quite happy for Sri Lanka to win, after Englands abject performance the previous day, but gradually........brilliant knock from Moeen Ali, I felt that the last five wickets tried - and nearly succeeded - to make amends, all sold themselves dearly.
Yesterday, I wanted Cook to go, but on reflection...who could replace him? It's been asked before on these pages, can't really see the captaincy sitting on the shoulders of any of the other senior pro's, and thankfully a godson of the Chairman of the Selectors isn't a county captain (Chris Cowdrey - 1989, I think)
IMHO Broad is too much of a big head & is full of himself.
I have to say there are no obvious alternatives to Cook, who himself only seems to be captain by default and with few apparent leadership qualities.
Perhaps England need look in the counties for someone in the Brearley mould, ie a good albeit not the highest class player but an outstanding captain and leader.
It's generally rare because of that very issue - bowlers spend a lot of time out of action due to injury. Anderson is probably the only first-choice bowler for England in the last ten years who has been fit consistently enough to be counted upon - but there are other reasons that he shouldn't captain England.It's rare to have a bowler as Test Captain - Bob Willis was the last for England, I think. lots of talk about Broad still carrying an injury, anyway.
Matt Prior could be a decent interim captain, he's a smart cricketer and he has, even more importantly, that natural competitive instinct common to hard-nosed South Africans like Graeme Smith, Dale Steyn and Jacques Kallis. .
Should Alistair Cook move down the batting order with Moeen Ali opening with Sam Robson?
It might take pressure off himself if he's not having to open & face the new ball.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How is Cook going to get back into good form, because at present, he's only in the team because he's Captain.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A very pertinent point, thanks to this ludicrous 'resting' of players many of the England players go into a Test Match with no form at all, before the 1st Test Chris Jordan hadn't bowled with a red ball since the end of April other than a Sussex 2nd XI fixture that he himself asked to play in, how players are supposed to find form is beyond me
Except his county form was exceptional at the start of the season, including 181 v Derbyshire and 127 against Surrey, which suggests that your idea is unlikely to make a lot of difference.He's going do the right thing and resign the captaincy to enable him to focus on getting back into form with Essex and playing his way back into the side.
Except his county form was exceptional at the start of the season, including 181 v Derbyshire and 127 against Surrey, which suggests that your idea is unlikely to make a lot of difference.
From what little I could gather from Greek media, this test match went much the same way as the first - their No10 lasted, ours didn't. Two sides with reasonable batting and suspect bowling. The England batting has been reasonable over the two matches, the bowling much less so. Broad and Anderson, who should be strike bowlers, have had to do long spells and have been drained. Why pick both Jordan and Plunkett, who are neither of them long spell bowlers, especially if you under-use Moeen? IMHO, it was the balance of the attack that lost the series.
As for Cook, there are no obvious captaincy replacements, and his batting will get better. All batsmen have lean spells, and IIRC, one of the strengths of good test teams has always been that you don't drop players for a bad run - you drop them when someone better is available, and there isn't.
Where I would make major changes (and this applies to the football team as well), is in the assessment of "experts". Vaughan and Boycott seem to have forgotten their own periods of difficulty, in favour of self-praise at the expense of the current team. But the public lap this up, and form their opinions based on the rose-tinted blinkers that make everything from 10 years or more ago seem great.