StKeverne1497
Member
So how come I find it - or something very similar - written down on the EV web pages of every manufacturer I've looked at?Modern battery chemistries mean the 20-80% thing isn't an issue any more.
So how come I find it - or something very similar - written down on the EV web pages of every manufacturer I've looked at?Modern battery chemistries mean the 20-80% thing isn't an issue any more.
It is a thing on older designed Lithium (NiMH etc ) batteries, narrower the range used the better. There's a chart on it showing 0-100% cycles of 500 and 30-70% cycles 7000 before degradation starts.So how come I find it - or something very similar - written down on the EV web pages of every manufacturer I've looked at?
NiMH aren't lithium batteries.It is a thing on older designed Lithium (NiMH etc ) batteries, narrower the range used the better. There's a chart on it showing 0-100% cycles of 500 and 30-70% cycles 7000 before degradation starts.
LFP (Lithium Iron Phosphate) batteries have no issues at all, go on forever so far, known as the million miles battery.
I think these numbers need checking. See my last paragraph
a car with a 77kwh battery has a WLTP range of 320 miles. (Specifically the VW ID4 Pro)
Scaling the battery to 50kwh gives it a range of 208 miles. It’s too early to say what the battery deterioration of VW EVs is, but assuming it is the same as Teslas, then it will reduce to around 90% after 100,000 miles minimum. Which means c190 miles range. Even allowing for the arbritary 25 miles contingency, that’s still 165 miles, which is rather more than you state.
But, of course, it’s hypothetical, as 70kwh+ batteries are going to become more and more common.
LPF batteries are fitted to half of current Tesla M3 & Ys, standard range MGs, most BYDs & most other Chinese made EVs and most commercials. The proportion is growing & as China dominates the EV market in particular in battery manufacturer that's what we get. CATL & BYD are moving to LFP.LFP batteries have only been used in some recent post October 2021 Teslas
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion batteries are the most popular. Without going into too much detail, they discharge and recharge as the electrolyte carries positively charged lithium ions from the anode to the cathode, and vice versa. However, the materials used in the cathode can vary between lithium-ion batteries.
LFP, NMC, and NCA are three different sub-chemistries of Lithium-ion batteries. LFP uses Lithium-phosphate as cathode material; NMC uses Lithium, Manganese, and Cobalt; and NCA uses Nickel, Cobalt and Aluminium.
Benefits of Lithium-ion batteries:
Last year, Tesla actually offered its Model 3 customers in America a choice between an NCA or an LFP battery. The NCA battery was 117kg lighter and offered 10 miles more range, but had a much longer lead time. However, Tesla also recommends that the NCA battery variant is only charged to 90% of its capacity. In other words, if you plan to regularly use the full range, the LFP may still be the better option.
- Cheaper to produce than NMC and NCA batteries.
- Longer lifespan - deliver 2,500-3,000 full charge/discharge cycles compared to 1,000 for NMC batteries.
- Generate less heat during charging so it can sustain a higher rate of power longer into the charge curve, leading to faster charge without battery damage.
- Can be charged to 100% with little battery damage as it helps to calibrate the battery and provide more accurate range estimates - Model 3 owners with an LFP battery are advised to keep the charge limit set to 100%
Nickel-metal hydride
Nickel-metal hydride batteries (abbreviated to NiMH) are the only real alternative to lithium-ion batteries that is currently on the market, though they are usually found in hybrid electric vehicles (mostly Toyota) as opposed to pure electric vehicles.
The main reason for this is that the energy density of NiMH batteries is as much as 40% lower than lithium-ion batteries.
Benefits of Nickel-metal hydride batteries
Lithium-ion batteries are preferred over NiMH batteries, but in colder climates, NiMH are best, and they help to push down the currently higher cost of electric cars.
- Much cheaper to manufacture than lithium-ion batteries
- Car battery recycling is also much easier.
- NiMH batteries can also withstand much harsher weather conditions, whether that’s freezing winters or blazing hot summers.
What next?
So we’ve explored the main electric car battery types on the market right now, but what about the electric car batteries of the future? Let’s take a look at some of the more promising developments:
Solid-state batteries
Solid-state batteries are widely touted to be the next big breakthrough in battery technology. These wouldn’t replace lithium-ion as such, but would use a solid rather than a liquid electrolyte.
When the technology is perfected, there are a number of benefits we can expect to see from solid state batteries.
Solid state batteries would be lighter and more compact than current batteries with a liquid electrolyte, which means the weight of the car could be reduced or the storage capacity increased.
Solid state batteries would also be more resistant to fire in the event that they are punctured or impacted, as they lack the flammable liquid electrolyte.
Maximum charging speeds would also be greatly improved, with a full recharge achieved in a little over 10 minutes. It’s also likely that they’ll have a much longer lifespan. Researchers at Harvard have already designed a lithium-metal solid-state battery that can be charged and discharged at least 10,000 times at a high current density.
Supercapacitors
Supercapacitors are electric storage devices which can be recharged very quickly and release a large amount of power. They store energy electrostatically rather than chemically, like a battery.
They cannot yet compete with Lithium-ion batteries because they have a much smaller capacity to store energy. However, they have far superior lifespans.
Supercapacitors are already used as ancillary devices to store energy from regenerative braking and to provide the necessary boost during quick accelerations, particularly in motorsport.
It will be interesting to look back on to this thread and similar ones on other forums in years to come to compare the real world battery reliability and deterioration against the spread of possibilities. Likewise capacity against weight, volume and inflation adjusted cost.
Tesla may be expecting only 10% capacity loss after 100,000 miles but you are looking at a premium product. For say ( relatively ) budget brands e.g. MG their priority has to be biased towards low coat rather than highest grade materials so the capacity loss from aging, the discharge level, number of charge / discharge cycles and rate of charging could be higher - time will tell.
The VAG 77kWh battery comes with volume, weight and cost penalties against ~50kWh. If capacity can be increased by 30% for the same volume, weight and relative cost then 65kWh could be typical.
I do not see a big reduction in energy use. Electric drives are already high efficiency / low loss with most enegry used to overcome friction and gravity. Lighting as LED uses a small amount and a car interior is a small volume to heat. For those with exclusive use of a charger pre-heating is likely to be available too.
While the WLTP range is intended to give a standardised comparison between vehicles how realistic is it to real world driving? For ICE cars the achieved mpg is often far less than that quoted.
For the WLTP range as an example look at the Vauxhall Mokka-e range calculator. The battery is 50kWh and headline range is 208 miles. However this is at 40mph. At 60mph it is 156 miles and at 70mph 127 miles. For each of those take off 25 miles reserve then charging to 80% and you have realistic ranges of 105 and 82 miles. Now work out for 25% capacity loss. The absolute ranges now become 156, 117 and 95 miles. With 25 miles reserve and charging to 80% the ranges are 105, 73.6 and just 56 miles. Only time will tell if pessimistic or realistic. Regardless for each case these are the numbers.
Most major EV OEMs and engineers say there are significant efficiencies still to come. The Lucid Air is achieving ~4.5 miles per kWh, which is nearly double that of a BMW i4. The upper ceiling for EV efficiency is currently thought to be around 7-8 miles per kWh, so even though an EV powertrain is very efficient, there are still huge gains to be found in wheel bearing design (which are comparatively underdeveloped), tyre rolling resistance, higher voltage system architectures (I believe currently only Audi/Porsche and Kia have got 800v for sale publicly, expect to see that number grow) as well as improving how what heat is generated by the powertrain is used for the cabin and batteries etc.I do not see a big reduction in energy use. Electric drives are already high efficiency / low loss with most enegry used to overcome friction and gravity. Lighting as LED uses a small amount and a car interior is a small volume to heat. For those with exclusive use of a charger pre-heating is likely to be available too.
Most major EV OEMs and engineers say there are significant efficiencies still to come. The Lucid Air is achieving ~4.5 miles per kWh, which is nearly double that of a BMW i4. The upper ceiling for EV efficiency is currently thought to be around 7-8 miles per kWh, so even though an EV powertrain is very efficient, there are still huge gains to be found in wheel bearing design (which are comparatively underdeveloped), tyre rolling resistance, higher voltage system architectures (I believe currently only Audi/Porsche and Kia have got 800v for sale publicly, expect to see that number grow) as well as improving how what heat is generated by the powertrain is used for the cabin and batteries etc.
tyre rolling resistance
Every EV I have seen or driven has the same tyres as an ICE car and last just as long.I've heard it said that EV cars have less tread on new tyres than ICE cars to reduce resistance, but with the consequence that tyres do not last so long. (And the additional weight of EV cars contributes to increased tyre wear.) Is there any truth to this rumour?
Electric cars weigh a bit more than ICE ones, so the tyres will have more work to do.I've heard it said that EV cars have less tread on new tyres than ICE cars to reduce resistance, but with the consequence that tyres do not last so long. (And the additional weight of EV cars contributes to increased tyre wear.) Is there any truth to this rumour?
Like a lot of things, it depends.Electric cars weigh a bit more than ICE ones, so the tyres will have more work to do.
I hope not! I've just invested in a significant sum to install home batteries to charge on cheap overnight power and run the house during the day from that. can't have schemes like this reducing the arbitrage opportunity!An article about the trial of Vehicle-To-Grid (V2G) technology. It seems the trial was success and with more cars now saying they are going include V2G technology in their new cars, is this a perfect way to balance the needs of the UK grid and 'save' a little on our electricity bills?
Octopus Energy & National Grid ESO Demonstrate Future Role For EVs In First For Great Britain - CleanTechnica
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News! The exciting potential benefits from the implementation of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technologies have been discussed for have very long time here on CleanTechnica. We are starting to see more exciting...cleantechnica.com
An article about the trial of Vehicle-To-Grid (V2G) technology. It seems the trial was success and with more cars now saying they are going include V2G technology in their new cars, is this a perfect way to balance the needs of the UK grid and 'save' a little on our electricity bills?
Octopus Energy & National Grid ESO Demonstrate Future Role For EVs In First For Great Britain - CleanTechnica
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News! The exciting potential benefits from the implementation of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technologies have been discussed for have very long time here on CleanTechnica. We are starting to see more exciting...cleantechnica.com
I hope not! I've just invested in a significant sum to install home batteries to charge on cheap overnight power and run the house during the day from that. can't have schemes like this reducing the arbitrage opportunity!
Actually I haven't put solar in for now. If I can buy electricity for 7.5p (or less) it's not really cost effective so someone else can have the cost and hassle of generating the power. If cheap overnight power stops being a thing I can put some panels on the room and wire them in to the inverter.Home batteries are a great investment, especially if linked to a decent sized solar Pv system (3kW+). I think that with increasing levels of EV ownership and grid balancing battery installations* the difference between overnight and day time electricity prices is likely to fall in the long term (5-10 years from now). In the short term it’s a great investment.
I had no idea this was a thing!Actually I haven't put solar in for now. If I can buy electricity for 7.5p (or less) it's not really cost effective so someone else can have the cost and hassle of generating the power.
Neither did I really till I wondered in an idle moment and did a bit of research.I had no idea this was a thing!
To be honest I cant see how a home battery without either solar or wind will work in most cases. If you are a low user the payback time will be pushing the life of the battery. If you are a high user you will need a massive battery otherwise your peak load is going to need to draw from the grid at the premium peak rates you need to pay to get 4 hours of ultra cheap power in the middle of the night.If you can buy electricity at 7.5p / kWh, then I can see how it will work. However there’s not many (any?) tariffs around that offer that, and given that right now on a summer evening the wholesale price of electricity is 74.6p/kWH, I suspect that any such deals will be short lived.
EDF had a 4.5p rate, fixed for a year until very recently.If you can buy electricity at 7.5p / kWh, then I can see how it will work. However there’s not many (any?) tariffs around that offer that, and given that right now on a summer evening the wholesale price of electricity is 74.6p/kWH, I suspect that any such deals will be short lived.
The batteries are modular so very scalable. You are correct that you need to select the inverter with care. I've gone for a 5kW model (will peak higher than that for a few minute or seconds depending how high)which should meet 98% of our usual loads.To be honest I cant see how a home battery without either solar or wind will work in most cases. If you are a low user the payback time will be pushing the life of the battery. If you are a high user you will need a massive battery otherwise your peak load is going to need to draw from the grid at the premium peak rates you need to pay to get 4 hours of ultra cheap power in the middle of the night.
Not convinced on those stats.My non stop EV record on 1 charge on a motorway is 190 miles using 78% charge, my 1 day trip record in an EV is 400 miles. I expect to break that this year maybe even beating my day diesel record. EVs are realistic.
Or you could say how will car fossil fuel economics stand up to solar/grid charging costs in a few years when the oil companies' dominance breaks down.Not convinced on those stats.
For around town the benefits of an EV is clear.
Going up the M40/6 from London to Manchester, this isnt going to cut it.. of course once you arrive, how do you recharge to return south, if your staying at friends etc, not a hotel, and whom may not have a charging point ?
Agree its getting better, but a liquid fuel replacement it still is not… the convenience that cars offered to replace trains was obvious, but to replace oil with EV is still not there yet.
When you can reliably and consistently get 500 miles, at mixed speeds of upto 70mph on a snowy day in January on a 3 -5 year old car batteries, and recharge it within 5 minutes at the pump… then its there.
How does electric car charging economics stand up to the up coming energy price “caps” tariffs ?
I agree with your thinking, The year when production and sale of new straight-IC engine cars will cease in the UK is 2030, I think 2030 is the newest announcement by Big Brother. The Green Light for 2030 , where did it come from? How was it derived?The question is not is it realistic but when will it be realistic. Currently for a majority of the population it isn't, for the reasons you stated as well as the cost.
Going up the M40/6 from London to Manchester, this isnt going to cut it.. of course once you arrive, how do you recharge to return south, if your staying at friends etc, not a hotel, and whom may not have a charging point ?
The same way you refuel an ICE car if your friend doesn't happen to have a petrol pump and 12,000l tank under the drive! You stop somewhere for 20 minutes, have a tea and pee and are on your way again.Not convinced on those stats.
For around town the benefits of an EV is clear.
Going up the M40/6 from London to Manchester, this isnt going to cut it.. of course once you arrive, how do you recharge to return south, if your staying at friends etc, not a hotel, and whom may not have a charging point ?
Is this a real application or a theoretical one? If the discharge rate of the batteries/ invertor floating on the grid is 5Kwp it will be capped at that otherwise if you get an unexpected peak such as a fridge freezer capacitor start it risks damaging the invertor.EDF had a 4.5p rate, fixed for a year until very recently.
I'm with Octopus, weirdly the day rate is lower than their flat rate fixed tariff (EDF day rate was very high as you'd expect). Its also fixed for a year.
I think it's all to do with avoiding curtailment fees when supply is higher than demand. You are meant to have an EV for to get these tariffs, I have one arriving in a few weeks (allegedly).
The batteries are modular so very scalable. You are correct that you need to select the inverter with care. I've gone for a 5kW model (will peak higher than that for a few minute or seconds depending how high)which should meet 98% of our usual loads.
At current prices this is going to payback in about 4 years (when I costed it was 7). Of course.im reliant upon that arbitrage being these, but if it disappears I'll plug some solar panels into the inverter.
It's a real application, half installed, just waiting on the inverter which is arriving today (or so I'm promised).Is this a real application or a theoretical one? If the discharge rate of the batteries/ invertor floating on the grid is 5Kwp it will be capped at that otherwise if you get an unexpected peak such as a fridge freezer capacitor start it risks damaging the invertor.
Even a 5 Kwp output requires a large battery most installers would recommend 13 Kwh + I think.
So I drive 190 miles home on the M6 & M40 using 78% of charge and because you don't like the answer I am somehow a liar?Not convinced on those stats.
For around town the benefits of an EV is clear.
Going up the M40/6 from London to Manchester, this isnt going to cut it.. of course once you arrive, how do you recharge to return south, if your staying at friends etc, not a hotel, and whom may not have a charging point ?
Agree its getting better, but a liquid fuel replacement it still is not… the convenience that cars offered to replace trains was obvious, but to replace oil with EV is still not there yet.
When you can reliably and consistently get 500 miles, at mixed speeds of upto 70mph on a snowy day in January on a 3 -5 year old car batteries, and recharge it within 5 minutes at the pump… then its there.
As long your reliant on hours of preplanning, extended breaks, risk the vagaries of available charging enroute and be happy with much longer more manicured travel plans, then a train starts to look more attractive than an EV journey.
How does electric car charging economics stand up to the up coming energy price “caps” tariffs ?