AndrewTaylor95
Member
These are all in serviceAlso taken from BLOTW (buslistontheweb.co.uk)
64201 - LG23EYV
64202 - LG23EYW
64203 - LG23EYX
64204 - LG23EYY
????? - LG23EZA
These are all in serviceAlso taken from BLOTW (buslistontheweb.co.uk)
64201 - LG23EYV
64202 - LG23EYW
64203 - LG23EYX
64204 - LG23EYY
????? - LG23EZA
That'll be the preserved 32570 with Prestige GroupSaw a white wedding B7TL on the M80, are these still with First?
Like most other routes they have been on the E200evs seem to put in around 12 hours work.Does anyone know how well the new E200EVs are holding up on the 6? With the E400s earmarked for Aberdeen and the 6 going single deck - I wondered if the E200EVs could become a regular on those routes or if they’ll stick mainly with the diesel E300s
What about bendy buses for the 6, could they handle the route with so many bendsLike most other routes they have been on the E200evs seem to put in around 12 hours work.
Today's latest trial Is on the 81.
As with all single deck routes the challenge is at the peaks. So some sort of double decks will be needed. In the 6 case on shirt routes avoiding high bridges.
I don’t think bendy buses are on the cards for any operators.What about bendy buses for the 6, could they handle the route with so many bends
They were tried many tears ago on the 2, then 62 and didn't pass the test. So doubtful any better nowWhat about bendy buses for the 6, could they handle the route with so many bends
I highly doubt that would happen.What about bendy buses for the 6, could they handle the route with so many bends
Only thing that would stop it is cost, the route would easily take bendy busesI highly doubt that would happen.
I don’t even think the 6 requires deckers anymore. Along with the 4 - it’s a route which has quietened down a lot over the years.Only thing that would stop it is cost, the route would easily take bendy buses
24th September - Service Changes
4 Sep 2023All Areas
From Sunday 24th September, revised timetables will be in place with minor adjustments on the following services:
Location: Cause: Responsibility: Dates: 4 Sep 2023
For updated timetables, please visit: firstglasgow.com/timetables
- Services M3, 10, 19 & 46
- Service 41 will see an increased frequency to every 12 minutes Mon – Fri with a revised timetable.
I had noticed a few weeks ago, that 47626/SN14 DZJ made an appearance on the 4/4A.Just saw 47462 on the 46. Quite unusual to see a Streetlite around this neck of the woods.
That’s a good thing, I just hope the extra demand of filling a higher frequency doesn’t lead to an increase in buses not showing up.Service 41 to get an increase frequency of every 12 minutes from the 24th of September.
Sunday 24th September - Service Changes
From Sunday 24th September, revised timetables will be in place with minor adjustments on the following services:www.firstbus.co.uk
Still busy at peaks . I remember at peak from city there is a gap of 15 minutes between services and this was timetabled.I don’t even think the 6 requires deckers anymore. Along with the 4 - it’s a route which has quietened down a lot over the years.
Surely a 12 Minute service from Calderwood to Glasgow City Centre would be sufficient using single decker?Still busy at peaks . I remember at peak from city there is a gap of 15 minutes between services and this was timetabled.
They should take some 71 and 22 plate deckers from Caledonia to boost capacity.Anytime I take the 6, usually from Battlefield/ cathcart to either city centre or up to east Kilbride, it's its usually quite busy
A problem with the 6 though is that quite often two buses come nearly together after 20/30 minute gap with the single decker bus packed and another bus a few minutes later practically empty (this is due to it being one of the longest routes in Glasgow and it passing through a few bad bottlenecks (great western road, the loop round the city centre, Victoria road) and a high chance of road works at some point on the route
The 3 route is particularly bad for this as well with that being a similarly long route
On a Sunday the 6 now seems to be mainly electric single deckers and they seem to be busy on a 20 min Sunday frequency
I would highly doubt they have the range to operate the 6. In fact they wouldn’t be able to operate most routes out of Scotstoun other than the 77.They should take some 71 and 22 plate deckers from Caledonia to boost capacity.
They'd be good on the 6 as they are 13' 9" and can fit under busby bridge.
I thought they couldn't fit under the bridge.They should take some 71 and 22 plate deckers from Caledonia to boost capacity.
They'd be good on the 6 as they are 13' 9" and can fit under busby bridge.
Yes, that's the problem with 6 and other routes. I have seen 4 buses in a row at times. You used to get more people using the 6 (66) up to East Kilbride. I remember there was Busby to City Centre which made the service every 5 minutes back around 2007.Anytime I take the 6, usually from Battlefield/ cathcart to either city centre or up to east Kilbride, it's its usually quite busy
A problem with the 6 though is that quite often two buses come nearly together after 20/30 minute gap with the single decker bus packed and another bus a few minutes later practically empty (this is due to it being one of the longest routes in Glasgow and it passing through a few bad bottlenecks (great western road, the loop round the city centre, Victoria road) and a high chance of road works at some point on the route
The 3 route is particularly bad for this as well with that being a similarly long route
On a Sunday the 6 now seems to be mainly electric single deckers and they seem to be busy on a 20 min Sunday frequency
On what basis? Route length is irrelevant when it comes to vehicle range, its average speed that matters.I would highly doubt they have the range to operate the 6. In fact they wouldn’t be able to operate most routes out of Scotstoun other than the 77.
The way Glasgow has had issues has not particularly been the cause of route length or average speed but the length of time the bus is out on the road from 5am till late at night for example.On what basis? Route length is irrelevant when it comes to vehicle range, its average speed that matters.
You could have one route that's 10 miles long and another that's 20 miles long, but if the average speed for both routes is the same then there's not going to be any difference in terms of vehicle range and how long the vehicle can be out for before returning to depot.
When you understand that by waiting a little longer First Glasgow would’ve had to the choice to superior products by ADLs own electric Enviro 400NXT or Volvo BZL, to bypass this problem First could fitted electric charging ports at the depot for future use but purchase more E6 Diesels, a perfectly viable option until at least 2030.
However that still ultimately comes down to average speed, if the average speed is lower then less mileage is covered over the same period of time and therefor the vehicle will be able to stay out longer. It is for that reason that Battery Electric buses tend to be better suited to slower start stop traffic. My point there was just that route length on its own isn't really a factor.The way Glasgow has had issues has not particularly been the cause of route length or average speed but the length of time the bus is out on the road from 5am till late at night for example.
I agree, although waiting times regarding the next generation Enviro400EV wouldn't have made that possible given the delivery deadline for the funding allocated. From what i have heard waiting times for the next generation Enviro100EV and Enviro400EV are still well in to next year and that is for vehicles ordered a considerable time ago. It does confuse me though why they ordered more BYDs especially for the higher mileage routes at Scotstoun when the issues regarding range were already know and equally it was already well known that the Yutong was a much superior product; hence why Aberdeen pushed for them.Where First Glasgow has had the problem has been prematurely buying to many electric buses without suitable surplus range, they only did so because the funding had been there at the time and they’ve worked the theoretical range very tightly to the distance the buses travel.
When you understand that by waiting a little longer First Glasgow would’ve had to the choice to superior products by ADLs own electric Enviro 400NXT or Volvo BZL, to bypass this problem First could fitted electric charging ports at the depot for future use but purchase more E6 Diesels, a perfectly viable option until at least 2030.
That doesn’t seem to have blighted our Capital City’s Operator..First would have had to pay for it, as they would not have got funding without buying the electric buses. They would have been council/government pressure to buy electric buses anyway as Scotland was falling behind other places as far as zero emission buses goes.
I believe so.Have First Glasgow settled on the E200ev as the bus of choice?