I thougaht We'd already disproved Mr Ford's analysis.
If you have disproved them I presume you have written to Mr Ford to show that his calculations are incorrect. He seems very happy to be corrected where he has got something wrong and openly admits to it in future columns. Yet in his February column he hasn't said he has received any complaints about his figures. So maybe his figures are accurate.
You still haven't answered my question. Have you emailed or written to Mr Ford to tell him you have completely disproven his figures?
Well as you have asked me twice, I can tell you the answer is no. I had only skimmed through the February column when I posted as above, but having now read it more carefully, I haven't changed my view.
I didn't say I had personally completely disproved his figures, what I was trying to say was that the times quoted on RTT for the test run suggested that either a speed higher than 107 mph (which Mr Ford mentions) on diesel must have been reached to achieve those times, or the acceleration on diesel is rather different from "running out of puff at 7 mph" or "IEP versus HST is like Usain Bolt taking on Mo Farah over 1,500 metres". I frequently travel by HST between Reading and Swindon, and even more frequently between Swindon and Bristol Parkway, and I know to do it in that sort of time with an HST certainly requires a top speed of over 120 mph.
However the only hard evidence on the test run I have is the data shown on RTT, and what
Clarence Yard has posted, and I would love to see a detailed log of the run. Therefore I consider I don't personally have enough detailed information to challenge him on it, nor do I see much point in doing so. We should find out one way or the other by the end of the year.
Roger Ford is a respected railway journalist, and like all journalists he has to write material which is sufficiently interesting to sell his publication. In doing so, he does seem to allow his opinion of the IEP project and his frustration with the lack of detailed information from people he interviews to influence some of what he writes on the subject.