XCTurbostar
Established Member
- Joined
- 13 Sep 2014
- Messages
- 2,102
GWR have confirmed (admittedly via Twitter) that 43172 will loose its livery with no plans to gain it again.
It is indeed now nameless.One of the Laira drivers said it was now nameless and being sent off lease
42172 is at Ely I believe. More likely 42173.Coaches are meant to be 42172, 42195, 42217, 42310, 42353 (prototype) & 44042
Does look like it's staying and going greenIt is indeed now nameless.
Coaches are meant to be 42173, 42195, 42217, 42310, 42353 (prototype) & 44042
It also seems strange that they are all Porterbrook vehicles. Other than the vehicles owned by FRH, most of the converted GWR coaches are Angel vehicles.Which is a very odd and rather motley collection of vehicles, as 5 of those are TS-Ds. I'm surprised about the inclusion of 42353 in that rake as well, as it was in an appalling state when it went off lease - I can only imagine that one will be for spares / scrap.
42172 is an ex EC Vehicle, so as @43096 has it will be 42173.
It also seems strange that they are all Porterbrook vehicles. Other than the vehicles owned by FRH, most of the converted GWR coaches are Angel vehicles.
Perhaps the six vehicles in question have been sold to FRH. Otherwise, won't Porterbrook have to pay Angel for the use of the door mods?
I'd say zero. These aren't intercity services they're working remember.Any chance GWR will standardize on 5 coaches like Scotrail intend, before it becomes too late to find any suitable spare Mk3s ?
Are ScotRail going for all 5-car? At the moment the original plan stands. And, no, not going to happen on GWR.Any chance GWR will standardize on 5 coaches like Scotrail intend, before it becomes too late to find any suitable spare Mk3s ?
It also seems strange that they are all Porterbrook vehicles. Other than the vehicles owned by FRH, most of the converted GWR coaches are Angel vehicles.
Perhaps the six vehicles in question have been sold to FRH. Otherwise, won't Porterbrook have to pay Angel for the use of the door mods?
What other reason could they have for being taken to Wabtec, other than to convert for Castle sets?It should be noted (again) that recent stock transfers from Porterbrook have been to GWR as franchise assets, rather than to First Rail Holdings which effectively acts as a traditional leasing company. It's a subtle but key difference and a relatively unusual arrangement.
Coaches heading to Doncaster aren't necessarily for conversion, so it shouldn't be taken as read that specific vehicles heading there will come back as converted 'sliders'.
What other reason could they have for being taken to Wabtec, other than to convert for Castle sets?
UK: Despite concerns over future passenger numbers, the Department for Transport has given permission for Great Western Railway to procure three more shortened HST diesel trainsets, branded as the Castle Class by the franchisee.
Each set comprises four refurbished PRM TSI-compliant MkIII trailer vehicles marshalled between two diesel power cars. GWR already has 11 of these ‘short sets’, all of which have been heavily rebuilt at Wabtec’s Doncaster plant, where power doors are fitted.
With its fleet now increasing to 14, GWR expects to use 12 each day on services across the west of England. Currently the fleet is deployed on the Cardiff – Bristol – Penzance corridor, but the company is still evaluating how the additional sets will be used.
How so - who wants to do journeys that long?Great news. That would just about be enough to connect up the existing services and operate an hourly Cardiff to Penzance service, which would be an excellent service.
From what I understand, there will be 15 coaches leased form angel, three coaches already owned by FRH, five coaches bought from porterbrook by GWR and seven PCs leased from angel. 43009, 010, 171 & 172 are already at Wabtec so presumably three more to go.
42353 is PB, was swapped when the first 11 sets cam about.Those 5 coaches bought from PB + FRH 42353 will be for spares only (they were all TSDs).
What is quoted elsewhere is that GWR are buying the 15 trailers and 7 power cars from Angel.From what I understand, there will be 15 coaches leased form angel, three coaches already owned by FRH, five coaches bought from porterbrook by GWR and seven PCs leased from angel. 43009, 010, 171 & 172 are already at Wabtec so presumably three more to go.
Well, I suspect that quite a few people wish to get from Cardiff & Newport down to south Devon & Cornwall and vice versa. By the time you factor in changing to/from the faster Cross Country services at Bristol, you often find that there is nothing much in it time wise between these and the HST direct services with their multiple-stops. Throw in possible lower fares by sticking with GWR and it would be easy to see how business could increase.How so - who wants to do journeys that long?
The cost would be tying Plymouth and Exeter commuters into the vagaries of Bristol and Cardiff delays.
Oh really, that would make more sense given the articles title.What is quoted elsewhere is that GWR are buying the 15 trailers and 7 power cars from Angel.
“Quite a few“ on what basis - are we talking a significant number of people who will actually go by train and will be put off by changing? Making it one service not only increases the delay risk but makes it harder to make the timings convenient for commuting and connections at either end.Well, I suspect that quite a few people wish to get from Cardiff & Newport down to south Devon & Cornwall and vice versa. By the time you factor in changing to/from the faster Cross Country services at Bristol, you often find that there is nothing much in it time wise between these and the HST direct services with their multiple-stops. Throw in possible lower fares by sticking with GWR and it would be easy to see how business could increase.
Wouldn't it be rather a waste of 158s to use them on slow Cornish branch lines?I just can't drop on it at the moment but I read that additional HSTs would replace 158s on the Cardiff to Penzance corridor allowing these to be deployed on Cornish Branches where route availability permits and, in turn, releasing 150s to help in displacing the Pacers at Exeter
Wouldn't it be rather a waste of 158s to use them on slow Cornish branch lines?
Up North where they need them. Then GWR could lose a class and simplify to 80x, HST, Turbo, 150Agreed, but if you have them available where else would you put them ?