• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

LNER Class 91/Mk4 service status/withdrawals/2021 refurbishment

Status
Not open for further replies.

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,301
The January Railway magazine says they will temporary withdrawn until June due to the reduced timetable including Werrington and Kings Cross engineering works with sets being stored at Doncaster and Leeds. Apparently the G exams at Doncaster will continue.
What's the odds on them not coming back? Plenty of crew competence will have lapsed by June.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

50039

Member
Joined
8 Mar 2015
Messages
489
Location
Bedfordshire
Last edited by a moderator:

43094

Member
Joined
19 May 2010
Messages
893
The moves on Thursday and yesterday were to turn the sets - this is related to storage arrangements.

91105 had an issue on 1Y00 yesterday and was rescued by 67001 at Hadley Wood. A Leeds and back was cancelled before 91105 came back out for the rest of the day.

The last one back onto depot was 91124 at 2250.

As above, the plan as it stands is they’ll be back in June. In between times there’s some work/exams to be done on both locos and sets - there should be some ECS moves run in connection with this.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,301
The moves on Thursday and yesterday were to turn the sets - this is related to storage arrangements.

91105 had an issue on 1Y00 yesterday and was rescued by 67001 at Hadley Wood. A Leeds and back was cancelled before 91105 came back out for the rest of the day.

The last one back onto depot was 91124 at 2250.

As above, the plan as it stands is they’ll be back in June. In between times there’s some work/exams to be done on both locos and sets - there should be some ECS moves run in connection with this.
What's being done to retain crew competence on them?
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
4,290
Location
County Durham
91101 and a full set of Mark 4s is working a Bounds Green - Doncaster Belmont move today for warm storage, via Newcastle to turn the set. https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/N09546/2021-01-26/detailed

Another set will make the same journey tomorrow, if I recall correctly likely to be hauled by 91114. https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/N09546/2021-01-27/detailed

On Thursday theres a Bounds Green - Neville Hill move, from what I've heard possibly formed of 3 91s, a single mark 4 and a DVT. https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/N09547/2021-01-28/detailed
 

mvm03

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2020
Messages
25
Location
Darlington
just wondering could the ecs trips up to newcastle be anything to do with retaining crew knowledge for using the 91s up to newcastle or is it simply for looping it around at the high level bridge?
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
4,290
Location
County Durham
just wondering could the ecs trips up to newcastle be anything to do with retaining crew knowledge for using the 91s up to newcastle or is it simply for looping it around at the high level bridge?
Simply for turning the set via the High Level Bridge.
 

CW2

Established Member
Joined
7 May 2020
Messages
1,922
Location
Crewe
Apropos the refurbishment of the 91s, how much use is ever made of the blunt end cab? Is it used for anything other than depot shunts? Could the locos be more cheaply refurbished by doing away with this cab, or at least reducing / simplifying the controls?
 

Mollman

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2016
Messages
1,235
Apropos the refurbishment of the 91s, how much use is ever made of the blunt end cab? Is it used for anything other than depot shunts? Could the locos be more cheaply refurbished by doing away with this cab, or at least reducing / simplifying the controls?
It gets used when there is a fault with the DVT / TDM system so the loco has to haul instead of push (not my photo)
https://flic.kr/p/RWGbEt
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
4,290
Location
County Durham
Does the set have to go into the yard loco first or something like that?
The lines in Belmont Yard used to store the sets are only partially wired, at the south end, meaning that's the end the 91 needs to be on for storage.

Apropos the refurbishment of the 91s, how much use is ever made of the blunt end cab? Is it used for anything other than depot shunts? Could the locos be more cheaply refurbished by doing away with this cab, or at least reducing / simplifying the controls?
They're used regularly for depot shunts, but as mentioned further up the thread are also used when a DVT fault requries the loco on a southbound service to run round. Light loco moves heading south (for example Doncaster Works - Bounds Green, though that particular move presumably won't happen again now that the 91s are moving to Neville Hill) would use the blunt end cab too. When the 91s were modified from 91/0s to 91/1s in the early 2000s only the streamlined end cabs were refurbished, so the blunt end cabs are still mostly the same internally as they were when the 91s were built.
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,942
91101 and a full set of Mark 4s is working a Bounds Green - Doncaster Belmont move today for warm storage, via Newcastle to turn the set. https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/N09546/2021-01-26/detailed

The lines in Belmont Yard used to store the sets are only partially wired, at the south end, meaning that's the end the 91 needs to be on for storage.

Presumably if it’s warm store the 91 will be staying with the set to keep it ‘warm’?
 

DanNCL

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2017
Messages
4,290
Location
County Durham
Presumably if it’s warm store the 91 will be staying with the set to keep it ‘warm’?
Yes that's right, the 91s are staying with the sets. 91127 has been there with a set since 15th January, 91101 arrived with a set today, and 91114 should arrive with a set tomorrow. 91107 and a set is also in reverse formation to enable warm storage at Belmont Yard, though that set is currently at Neville Hill.
 

ash39

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2012
Messages
1,503
I know it's irrelevant now because they've done it via the high level bridge, but is there any reason they couldn't theoretically have turned them using the Shipley triangle?
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,942
I know it's irrelevant now because they've done it via the high level bridge, but is there any reason they couldn't theoretically have turned them using the Shipley triangle?

Going via the High Level Bridge is simply easier as is doesn’t require any reversals.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,088
I know it's irrelevant now because they've done it via the high level bridge, but is there any reason they couldn't theoretically have turned them using the Shipley triangle?
Are they route cleared for the 3rd side of the triangle?
 

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,427
Location
York
I know it's irrelevant now because they've done it via the high level bridge, but is there any reason they couldn't theoretically have turned them using the Shipley triangle?
Remember that, even in covid times, paths won’t be easy to find on the shipley triangle, especially if it’s going at low speed.
 

DorkingMain

Member
Joined
25 Aug 2020
Messages
692
Location
London, UK
I'm sure this has been discussed already - but what was the reasoning behind keeping a limited number of 91 / Mk4 sets, and not ordering enough IETs to replace the whole fleet?
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
3,576
And from Feb 5th they will start to rotate all sets through Neville Hill for a 28 day storage exam so will still be in operation between Doncaster and Neville Hill, therefore keeping driver competency up.
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,942
I'm sure this has been discussed already - but what was the reasoning behind keeping a limited number of 91 / Mk4 sets, and not ordering enough IETs to replace the whole fleet?

The IET fleet was ordered to deliver 6tph for the East Coast TOC. VTEC in its bid decided it wanted 6.5tph and so needed a small fleet of 91s retained. LNER has decided to retain that 6.5tph plan so still needs some extra trains. There is a tender out currently for some more new trains to run that extra 0.5tph and the retained 91s and mk4s are a stopgap.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
3,576
Thursday is the move to watch, Bounds Green to Neville Hill 91106, 119, 130, 1 COACH AND DVT 82205.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top