hexagon789
Veteran Member
Not in the slightest, hence the emojis!OK fair enough! Hope I didn't come across too argumentative, I didn't mean to.
I just meant to point out that these are not my proposals, rather what XC have said themselves.
Which was also arguably more cost effective; running fewer fuller trains than more frequent, more evenly loaded ones.Interesting that this is actually something of a move back more to the BR philosophy on IC routes which was to increase frequency at busy times and provide a thinner offering off-peak. By contrast, in recent (pre-Covid) years the philosophy has been the high-frequency all-day service. The pros to the "peak only" philosophy would be less wear and tear on the stock, and less staff time needed, but the cons would be that you can "build the market" by running an all day even interval service, and the stock requirements for an all-day high-frequency service are little more than a peak-only high-frequency service.
It depends when the Reading-Newcastles do run, I guess. For an adequate service, at a guess, they need to provide them on the Reading-Birmingham section Mon-Fri until around mid-morning and from mid-afternoon, and all day Saturday (indeed all day Mon-Fri in school holidays).