2011/2 Soham box closed and replaced with a number of auto signals that have reduced the headway between Bury and Chippenham Jn.
I think you mean Kennett ’box; Soham ‘box closed when Cambridge PSB was commissioned in the 80s.
2011/2 Soham box closed and replaced with a number of auto signals that have reduced the headway between Bury and Chippenham Jn.
Indeed I did.I think you mean Kennett ’box; Soham ‘box closed when Cambridge PSB was commissioned in the 80s.
Wistow Road in Newton Harcourt is closing today (24 March 2023) from the junction with Kibworth Road. People are being asked to follow the signposted diversions for Station Road.
Network Rail is electrifying the Midland Main Line from Kettering to Wigston. All of this work will help to create a cleaner, greener electrified railway for passengers travelling along this section of the Midland Main Line in the future.
Today's road closure, which lasts until December, is linked to work by Network Rail to raise a bridge in Great Glen, Newton Harcourt. Reconstructing the bridge – which allows cars to travel over the railway via Station Road – and raising it by just over half a metre will provide enough room for the overhead line equipment needed to power electric and hybrid trains to eventually pass underneath the bridge.
Press release
![]()
Leicestershire road closure due to Midland Mainline electrification
Wistow Road in Newton Harcourt is closing today (24 March 2023) from the junction with Kibworth Road. People are being asked to follow the signposted diversions for Station Road.www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk
If I had to identify the roads in question I'd find it very confusing. For example, a section of the Wistow to Kibworth Harcourt road shown on the OS 1:25k map as Wistow Road is shown on a larger scale map as Kibworth Road. However, I'm content to watch from a distance.
I think the bridge at Wistow Rd (SPC3-9) is slightly harder to access based on its location, so it's having to be closed alongside Station Rd (SPC3-10)That is confusing! Has the bridge on Station Road now been rebuilt? Last time I looked Station Road was still closed. The bridge at Wistow Road, Newton Harcourt is obviously completely different.
I think the bridge at Wistow Rd (SPC3-9) is slightly harder to access based on its location, so it's having to be closed alongside Station Rd (SPC3-10)
The current diversionary route is via Wigston Rd (SPC3-7) so it's safe to say all traffic will be running via there until Station Rd is reopened (IIRC in late July).
I believe Wigston Rd closes in August/September.
Most of the time they're visible on the white "bridge strike" plates (with the red border), saying something like "This is Bridge [insert number here]". Sometimes it's attached to the structure at rail level, or on a post nearby.I see, thanks for that, you are always well informed with your bridge numbers etc. how do you access that information? I can try and be more accurate with my descriptions in future![]()
They will need to be if NR want decent access and passengers want trains most of the day.You are making the courageous assumption that the diversionary routes in use today would still be in use ‘tomorrow’ for EMR intercity services in the event that the MML was electrified throughout.
and the PSB soon to be updated or itself replaced?I think you mean Kennett ’box; Soham ‘box closed when Cambridge PSB was commissioned in the 80s.
The ECML's coped without wired diversions for plenty of years.They will need to be if NR want decent access and passengers want trains most of the day.
Keeps getting proposed then slipping AIUI.and the PSB soon to be updated or itself replaced?
To add to the above reply by @59CosG95 the MML is one of the lines covered in some detail on the railway codes site here:Many thanks 59CosG95.
Perhaps but that was with Diesel only and now Bi-mode Diesel trains not sure in the climate crisis thats a great idea. However thats where government doesn't seem to have, nor understands, joined up cross department policy.The ECML's coped without wired diversions for plenty of years.
GrrrKeeps getting proposed then slipping AIUI.
and the PSB soon to be updated or itself replaced?
It's not a question of cross-departmental policy but value for money. How often are total blocks of long sections of the MML required during high-traffic hours?Perhaps but that was with Diesel only and now Bi-mode Diesel trains not sure in the climate crisis thats a great idea. However thats where government doesn't seem to have, nor understands, joined up cross department policy.
Roger Ford - Informed Sources Rule 1?Perhaps but that was with Diesel only and now Bi-mode Diesel trains not sure in the climate crisis thats a great idea. However thats where government doesn't seem to have, nor understands, joined up cross department policy.
Grrr
It doesn't have to be a total block. A rail or signalling defect, or other isolated issue at say, Market Harborough, would cripple the route were it not for the Manton diversion.It's not a question of cross-departmental policy but value for money. How often are total blocks of long sections of the MML required during high-traffic hours?
Will have to remind me I'm afraidRoger Ford - Informed Sources Rule 1?
Roger Ford - Informed Sources Rule 1?
Never assume railways are a rational organisation.Will have to remind me I'm afraid
Blame the politicans for that oneNever assume railways are a rational organisation.
There are enough examples arising from within the railway before you even begin to discuss the influence of politicians.Blame the politicans for that one![]()
Roger Ford is a British journalist specialising in rail transport.[1] He is Industry and Technology Editor of the monthly trade and technical magazine Modern Railways, where he is probably best known for his column Informed Sources, noted for its in-depth analysis of railway technical, commercial and policy issues.[2] He is also founding editor of Rail Business Intelligence.[3]
and him / them of course
Bi-Di is better value for money against a single line defect. There are very few routes that actually use diversionary routes, and most of what exist are accidents of history.It doesn't have to be a total block. A rail or signalling defect, or other isolated issue at say, Market Harborough, would cripple the route were it not for the Manton diversion.
The many diversionary possibilities are what gives our route the resilience that means we generally keep at least some trains running during times of disruption.
I don't believe it's been commissioned yet; once it is, then you'll notice the circuit breakers opening/closing.Passed by the sectioning site at East Hyde today and it looks like the cross-track feeders are connected, though I can't say whether or not it's been commissioned.
Country-end cross-track feeder
View attachment 131582
London-end cross-track feeder
View attachment 131583
There's now a UKMS portal between them as well (as opposed to the Mk3 portals replacing the failing headspans), but it doesn't look like a neutral section to me; the circuit breaker didn't open or close when my train (a Class 700) passed it. Does that mean Sandridge will remain the boundary between the Borehamwood & Chalton feeds?
View attachment 131584
That'll be the work for the ATF then. I'd suspect that the ATF insulators atop little stovepipes above the booms will be in by Monday morning.The view from the footbridge at Little Bowden last night.