• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

MML Electrification: progress updates

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,490
2011/2 Soham box closed and replaced with a number of auto signals that have reduced the headway between Bury and Chippenham Jn.

I think you mean Kennett ’box; Soham ‘box closed when Cambridge PSB was commissioned in the 80s.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,887
Location
Leeds
Press release


Wistow Road in Newton Harcourt is closing today (24 March 2023) from the junction with Kibworth Road. People are being asked to follow the signposted diversions for Station Road.

Network Rail is electrifying the Midland Main Line from Kettering to Wigston. All of this work will help to create a cleaner, greener electrified railway for passengers travelling along this section of the Midland Main Line in the future.

Today's road closure, which lasts until December, is linked to work by Network Rail to raise a bridge in Great Glen, Newton Harcourt. Reconstructing the bridge – which allows cars to travel over the railway via Station Road – and raising it by just over half a metre will provide enough room for the overhead line equipment needed to power electric and hybrid trains to eventually pass underneath the bridge.

If I had to identify the roads in question I'd find it very confusing. For example, a section of the Wistow to Kibworth Harcourt road shown on the OS 1:25k map as Wistow Road is shown on a larger scale map as Kibworth Road. However, I'm content to watch from a distance.
 
Last edited:

PJM

Member
Joined
20 Aug 2021
Messages
175
Location
Market Harborough
Press release




If I had to identify the roads in question I'd find it very confusing. For example, a section of the Wistow to Kibworth Harcourt road shown on the OS 1:25k map as Wistow Road is shown on a larger scale map as Kibworth Road. However, I'm content to watch from a distance.

That is confusing! Has the bridge on Station Road now been rebuilt? Last time I looked Station Road was still closed. The bridge at Wistow Road, Newton Harcourt is obviously completely different.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,538
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
That is confusing! Has the bridge on Station Road now been rebuilt? Last time I looked Station Road was still closed. The bridge at Wistow Road, Newton Harcourt is obviously completely different.
I think the bridge at Wistow Rd (SPC3-9) is slightly harder to access based on its location, so it's having to be closed alongside Station Rd (SPC3-10)

The current diversionary route is via Wigston Rd (SPC3-7) so it's safe to say all traffic will be running via there until Station Rd is reopened (IIRC in late July).
I believe Wigston Rd closes in August/September.
 

PJM

Member
Joined
20 Aug 2021
Messages
175
Location
Market Harborough
I think the bridge at Wistow Rd (SPC3-9) is slightly harder to access based on its location, so it's having to be closed alongside Station Rd (SPC3-10)

The current diversionary route is via Wigston Rd (SPC3-7) so it's safe to say all traffic will be running via there until Station Rd is reopened (IIRC in late July).
I believe Wigston Rd closes in August/September.

I see, thanks for that, you are always well informed with your bridge numbers etc. how do you access that information? I can try and be more accurate with my descriptions in future 8-)
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,538
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
I see, thanks for that, you are always well informed with your bridge numbers etc. how do you access that information? I can try and be more accurate with my descriptions in future 8-)
Most of the time they're visible on the white "bridge strike" plates (with the red border), saying something like "This is Bridge [insert number here]". Sometimes it's attached to the structure at rail level, or on a post nearby.

E.g. looking north from bridge SPC3-28, you can see that the A6 Market Harborough Bypass to the north has a sign saying "SPC3-27F" to the north of it.

The ABC Railway Guide website also gives an OpenStreetMap list of structures in a given local authority e.g. Leicestershire County Council, however, as the data is open-source it can be a tad tricky to find the right location at times.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,993
You are making the courageous assumption that the diversionary routes in use today would still be in use ‘tomorrow’ for EMR intercity services in the event that the MML was electrified throughout.
They will need to be if NR want decent access and passengers want trains most of the day.

I think you mean Kennett ’box; Soham ‘box closed when Cambridge PSB was commissioned in the 80s.
and the PSB soon to be updated or itself replaced?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,706
Many thanks 59CosG95.
To add to the above reply by @59CosG95 the MML is one of the lines covered in some detail on the railway codes site here:
The railway data centre site also has info in a different format, for your purpose you probably need to search by Engineer’s Line Reference (ELR) ie “SPC3” for the area in question:
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,993
The ECML's coped without wired diversions for plenty of years.
Perhaps but that was with Diesel only and now Bi-mode Diesel trains not sure in the climate crisis thats a great idea. However thats where government doesn't seem to have, nor understands, joined up cross department policy.

Keeps getting proposed then slipping AIUI.
Grrr
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,725
Location
Bristol
Perhaps but that was with Diesel only and now Bi-mode Diesel trains not sure in the climate crisis thats a great idea. However thats where government doesn't seem to have, nor understands, joined up cross department policy.
It's not a question of cross-departmental policy but value for money. How often are total blocks of long sections of the MML required during high-traffic hours?
 

Kneedown

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2007
Messages
1,770
Location
Nottinghamshire
It's not a question of cross-departmental policy but value for money. How often are total blocks of long sections of the MML required during high-traffic hours?
It doesn't have to be a total block. A rail or signalling defect, or other isolated issue at say, Market Harborough, would cripple the route were it not for the Manton diversion.
The many diversionary possibilities are what gives our route the resilience that means we generally keep at least some trains running during times of disruption.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,887
Location
Leeds
Blame the politicans for that one :E
There are enough examples arising from within the railway before you even begin to discuss the influence of politicians.

Roger Ford's other Laws are listed on the Wikipedia page about him.


Roger Ford is a British journalist specialising in rail transport.[1] He is Industry and Technology Editor of the monthly trade and technical magazine Modern Railways, where he is probably best known for his column Informed Sources, noted for its in-depth analysis of railway technical, commercial and policy issues.[2] He is also founding editor of Rail Business Intelligence.[3]
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,725
Location
Bristol
It doesn't have to be a total block. A rail or signalling defect, or other isolated issue at say, Market Harborough, would cripple the route were it not for the Manton diversion.
The many diversionary possibilities are what gives our route the resilience that means we generally keep at least some trains running during times of disruption.
Bi-Di is better value for money against a single line defect. There are very few routes that actually use diversionary routes, and most of what exist are accidents of history.

Case in point - no diversionary capacity was maintained for HS1. If London-Paris wasn't worth diversionary capacity, why would London-Leicester?
 

Edvid

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
1,408
Passed by the sectioning site at East Hyde today and it looks like the cross-track feeders are connected, though I can't say whether or not it's been commissioned.

Country-end cross-track feeder
VID_20230325_131823871_Momente.jpg

London-end cross-track feeder
VID_20230325_131823871_Moment(3)e.jpg

There's now a UKMS portal between them as well (as opposed to the Mk3 portals replacing the failing headspans), but it doesn't look like a neutral section to me; the circuit breaker didn't open or close when my train (a Class 700) passed it. Does that mean Sandridge will remain the boundary between the Borehamwood & Chalton feeds?
VID_20230325_131823871_Moment(2)e.jpg
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,538
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Passed by the sectioning site at East Hyde today and it looks like the cross-track feeders are connected, though I can't say whether or not it's been commissioned.

Country-end cross-track feeder
View attachment 131582

London-end cross-track feeder
View attachment 131583

There's now a UKMS portal between them as well (as opposed to the Mk3 portals replacing the failing headspans), but it doesn't look like a neutral section to me; the circuit breaker didn't open or close when my train (a Class 700) passed it. Does that mean Sandridge will remain the boundary between the Borehamwood & Chalton feeds?
View attachment 131584
I don't believe it's been commissioned yet; once it is, then you'll notice the circuit breakers opening/closing.
Note the in-line insulating rods in the catenary either side of the F+F SICs; they'll become the neutral section cantilevers once the contact wire part of the neutral section is installed.
 

Edvid

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
1,408
Ah, I see. If memory serves the neutral section fittings at Borehamwood were all installed in one extended possession (Christmas 2010) so I thought the same would apply here.
 

Trainben

Member
Joined
18 Aug 2021
Messages
33
Location
Leicestershire
The view from the footbridge at Little Bowden last night.
 

Attachments

  • 20230325_174726.jpg
    20230325_174726.jpg
    966.3 KB · Views: 134
  • 20230325_174631.jpg
    20230325_174631.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 135

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
68,840
Location
Yorkshire
This thread is for actual updates regarding MML electrification.

Any speculative posts belongs in the Speculative Discussion section please; for example the thread linked below:

 
Last edited:

Top