You make a good point SteveM70.
The NYMR also has a tourist location that would be the envy of many other lines in the country.
I guess that the recipe for making the railway sustainable is proving difficult to find. All options seem to have drawbacks or upset some people.
All i do know is that if places like the NYMR were to go to the wall, our enthusiast world would be a poorer place.
I think it just goes to show that route length is as much as a drawback as it is a benefit.
I still believe they could offer a two-tier fare system that would please more people and gain more revenue:
1) One for end to end Whitby traffic, priced higher. These trains could be advertised as non stop to prevent ordinary fare holders joining. These could be pre-booked with perhaps one carriage for walk-ups or possibly passengers in the below category. Pre-booking would protect the railways income in the event of bad weather.
2) A separate cheaper fare for those happy to stay on the internal railway, run in the traditional way. This could be provided with a diesel, a railcar or a short steam set. It could always be extended if it proved popular or at peak times. If the Whitby trains were fully booked, prospective Whitby passengers may settle for this option instead or it might be better for those with shorter attention spans, just wanting a spin behind a steam train, the more price-conscious, plus hikers or those with an interest in Harry Potter or Heartbeat.
I don’t see why both markets can’t be served, there’s enough rolling stock to do so.