Baxenden Bank
Established Member
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 4,291
Rechecking happens when the company asks for it (and assuming the inspectors then have a window in their diary!), rather than the MCA setting a timetable for compliance. The MCA won't (and shouldn't) be concerned whether these ships ever sail again or not, only that when they do, they are safe to do so. The owners have the incentive to comply or their asset earns nothing. It would be a terrible shame if, when asked, all the inspectors happended to be on a months accrued leave or training!Hard to say whether there was a plan. Maybe they thought the safety checks would be nodded through otherwise the timing - not long before Easter was wrong. What was wrong with mid January?
Maybe they thought the government would be distracted by other things, instead the government has acted tough (or appeared to) to try to distract us from a range of other matters (we all know what they are).
What would be interesting to know is whose idea/ plan it was. P & O Ferries must be losing even more money now. According to South East Today (BBC local TV), there are no plans to recheck the ferries currently and the replacements for the seven drunk staff will need to be recruited and trained.
The longer it lasts, the more permanent the temporary alternative arrangements will become. Perhaps someone thought the MCA woud just rollover and allow any old arrangements to avoid the bad publicity of delays at ports.
If I were a former staff member I would be hurrying up any enhanced severance payment, just in case the company goes bust and I then had to fall back on statutory redundancy terms.