It's a better website and system than their own TOC sites. Offering really useful infomation.Why would they be against it?
It's a better website and system than their own TOC sites. Offering really useful infomation.Why would they be against it?
I know one operator that will be against it purely because RTT doesn't use Darwin dataWhy would they be against it?
Yes, but the fleet is so standardised it’s not such a big event but still nice to have.I see Greater Anglia has joined Know Your Train![]()
That’s a useful addition.I see Greater Anglia has joined Know Your Train![]()
It's not new: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/about/trackyourtrain/Also noticed a new panel under the train graphic showing current progress of the train?
Depends whether you are trying to chase specific units or not. Absolute game changer for anyone trying to accumulate 720s for haulage.Yes, but the fleet is so standardised it’s not such a big event but still nice to have.
That has been available for some time.Also noticed a new panel under the train graphic showing current progress of the train?
- En-route
- Between Harold Wood and Brentwood
- Route set to between Brentwood and Shenfield
- Following 1K28 0955 London Liverpool Street to Southend Victoria
Specific to the routes from Liverpool Street while trains are moving through a defined area I think.I’ve possibly not noticed it as that feature doesn’t appear on any trains in my local area, is it specific to certain train operating companies?
Supported Operators and Routes
Operator Supported Services
Greater Anglia
London Liverpool Street to Norwich
London Liverpool Street to Southend Victoria
London Overground
London Liverpool Street to Chingford (only)
TfL Rail
London Liverpool Street to Shenfield
This service will support any service operating along the line of route listed above. For example, London Liverpool Street to Norwich includes services from London to Ipswich.
If an operator, route or service is not listed, then we do not currently support it.
Ah, ok thanks for the explanation.Specific to the routes from Liverpool Street while trains are moving through a defined area I think.
Does that mean that some short notice diversions will show instead of defaulting to "no report" when the train is off the booked route?That'll probably be the focus of our next few months once we've rolled out the next upgrades to the platform - which will add off route capability in a limited way initially and some improvements to how location statuses (arriving/approaching/etc) work under the hood.
This feature looks really cool! Hopefully we can see it come to the East Coast Mainline - especially given the frequency of diversions nowadays.We've got some (fairly slow) plans to roll TYT out to wider areas in its full guise but it is in use in a fair few places under the hood. To pull the data together for TYT is incredibly complex as it uses a lot of fairly impenetrable datasets. You can tell (underlying) TYT areas as you'll also see "Ready to depart" and "Preparing to depart" on terminal stations and platform numbers will confirm as the train gets routed through them.
That'll probably be the focus of our next few months once we've rolled out the next upgrades to the platform - which will add off route capability in a limited way initially and some improvements to how location statuses (arriving/approaching/etc) work under the hood.
On another note, I think I'll be surprised if I see another operator releasing allocations in the future. That's not to say KYT won't expand though...
This is an issue with the data RTT is provided with by Northern, where pantograph carriages and DMU driving carriages show up on the know your train feature the wrong way round.Not sure if this is already known but I just noticed that the pantograph is in the wrong spot on 769s on the drawings.
The pantograph is in the middle (either on Coach 2 or 3 nearest the other), either way this is a very minor thing very few would notice (let alone care about), but I wanted to at least make sure it was known.
View attachment 152824
View attachment 152825
Yes I had a feeling it might be related to that issue, but hadn't heard of the 769's having the problem.This is an issue with the data RTT is provided with by Northern, where pantograph carriages and DMU driving carriages show up on the know your train feature the wrong way round.
They do look good, however I’ve seen that 91119 is in the lner livery on there now too!I've just found out RTT has (finally) updated the Intercity 225 diagrams with the correct livery. Not massive news but great to see none the less.
They do look good, however I’ve seen that 91119 is in the lner livery on there now too!
They do look good, however I’ve seen that 91119 is in the lner livery on there now too!
I’m sure this has been mentionedbefore but you have to be careful how you use RTT. I was at Edinburgh Park this morning to see the elusive 334040 and an HST rushed thro’ but no sign on RTT.As has been mentioned tens of times in this thread, RTT simply displays the allocation data provided by the operator. It's probably a set swap where the replacement has been added but the original hasn't been removed by whoever input the swap at C2C for whatever reason.
Why is it elusive?was at Edinburgh Park this morning to see the elusive 334040
334 040 has just returned to service after some time being unavailable.Why is it elusive?
Thanks.This is normal behaviour for a VSTP working: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:53392/2024-03-01/detailed
VSTP schedules aren’t validated are checked for sanity so we don’t even attempt to infill locations into them.