• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

SWR Metro fleet permanent withdrawals

Juniper Driver

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Messages
2,074
Location
SWR Metals
No problem at all, pleasure to make it. I’ll update it weekly if there are regular changes to the fleet.

Is 458535 back in service then? Also, other than stopped 507/517/534 I have 504 as the only not operational 458 (long term OOU) - does this remain the case? :)
I haven't managed to check whether it's in Clapham Yard.Where it was stored 46 road I think.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,509
Location
Farnham
Thursday, November 18th 2021
Updated list


455701 Operational with SWR

455702 Operational with SWR
455703 Operational with SWR

455704 Stopped, out of miles
455705 Operational with SWR
455706 Operational with SWR
455707 Operational with SWR
455708 Operational with SWR
455709 Operational with SWR
455710 Operational with SWR
455711 Operational with SWR
455712 Operational with SWR
455713 Operational with SWR
455714 Operational with SWR
455715 Operational with SWR
455716 Operational with SWR

455717 Operational but low on miles
455718 Operational with SWR
455719 Operational with SWR
455720 Operational with SWR
455721 Operational with SWR
455722 Operational with SWR
455723 Operational with SWR
455724 Operational with SWR

455725 Long-term out of use
455726 Long-term out of use
455727 Operational with SWR
455728 Operational with SWR
455729 Operational with SWR
455730 Operational with SWR
455731 Operational with SWR
455732 Operational with SWR
455733 Operational with SWR
455734 Operational with SWR
455735 Operational with SWR

455736 Stopped, out of miles
455737 Operational with SWR
455738 Operational but low on miles
455739 Operational with SWR
455740 Long-term out of use
455741 Operational with SWR
455742 Operational with SWR

455750 Operational but low on miles

455847 Long-term out of use
455848 Long-term out of use

455849 Operational with SWR
455850 Operational with SWR
455851 Operational with SWR
455852 Operational with SWR
455853 Operational with SWR

455854 Long-term out of use
455855 Stopped, out of miles
455856 Operational with SWR
455857 Operational with SWR
455858 Operational with SWR
455859 Operational with SWR
455860 Operational with SWR
455861 Operational with SWR
455862 Operational with SWR
455863 Operational with SWR
455864 Operational with SWR
455865 Operational with SWR

455866 Long-term out of use / Goes off lease Feb 22
455867 Operational with SWR
455868 Operational with SWR
455869 Operational with SWR
455870 Operational with SWR
455871 Operational with SWR
455872 Operational with SWR
455873 Operational with SWR
455874 Operational with SWR

455901 Operational with SWR
455902 Operational with SWR
455903 Operational with SWR
455904 Operational with SWR

455905 Long-term out of use
455906 Operational with SWR
455907 Long-term out of use
455908 Operational with SWR
455909 Operational with SWR
455910 Operational with SWR
455911 Operational with SWR
455912 Operational with SWR

455913 Long-term out of use
455914 Operational with SWR
455915 Operational with SWR
455916 Operational with SWR
455917 Operational with SWR

455918 Operational Goes off-lease Feb 22
455919 Operational with SWR
455920 Operational with SWR


456001 Long-term out of use
456002 Operational with SWR
456003 Operational with SWR
456004 Operational with SWR

456005 Long-term out of use
456006 Operational with SWR
456007 Operational with SWR
456008 Operational with SWR
456009 Operational with SWR
456010 Operational with SWR
456011 Operational with SWR
456012 Operational with SWR
456013 Operational with SWR
456014 Operational with SWR
456015 Operational with SWR
456016 Operational with SWR

456017 Long-term out of use
456018 Long-term out of use

456019 Operational with SWR
456020 Operational with SWR
456021 Operational with SWR
456022 Operational with SWR
456023 Operational with SWR
456024 Operational with SWR

458501 Operational with SWR
458502 Operational with SWR
458503 Operational with SWR

458504 Long-term out of use
458505 Operational with SWR
458506 Long-term out of use
458507 Stored awaiting transfer to Widnes
458508 Operational with SWR
458509 Operational with SWR
458510 Operational with SWR
458511 Operational with SWR
458512 Operational with SWR -
will soon be temporarily withdrawn for C6
458513 Operational with SWR
458514 Operational with SWR
458515 Operational with SWR
458516 Operational with SWR

458517 Stored awaiting transfer to Widnes
458518 Operational with SWR
458519 Operational with SWR
458520 Operational with SWR
458521 Operational with SWR
458522 Operational with SWR
458523 Operational with SWR
458524 Operational with SWR
458525 Operational with SWR
458526 Operational with SWR
458527 Operational with SWR
458528 Operational with SWR

458529 Long-term out of use
458530 Operational with SWR
458531 Operational with SWR
458532 Operational with SWR
458533 Operational with SWR

458534 Off-lease
458535 Long-term out of use
458536 Operational with SWR

707001 Transferred to SouthEastern
707002 Operational with SWR
707003 Transferred to SouthEastern
707004 Transferred to SouthEastern
707005 Transferred to SouthEastern
707006 Transferred to SouthEastern
707007 Transferred to SouthEastern
707008
Transferred to SouthEastern
707009 Transferred to SouthEastern
707010
Transferred to SouthEastern
707011 Transferred to SouthEastern
707012 Transferred to SouthEastern

707013 Operational with SWR
707014 Operational with SWR
707015 Operational with SWR
707016 Operational with SWR
707017 Operational with SWR
707018 Operational with SWR
707019 Operational with SWR
707020 Operational with SWR
707021 Operational with SWR
707022 Operational with SWR
707023 Operational with SWR
707024 Operational with SWR

707025 Transferred to SouthEastern
707026 Transferred to SouthEastern
707027 Transferred to SouthEastern
707028
Transferred to SouthEastern
707029 Transferred to SouthEastern
707030 Operational with SWR

List denotes the status of SWR's Metro / Inner-Suburban fleet
Class 450 and Class 701 units are not shown as these will remain with SWR permanently
Class 450 and Class 458 units are planned to be withdrawn from Inner-Suburban duties

Currently, 0x Class 701 units are in service
 

MontyP

Member
Joined
18 Nov 2015
Messages
335
Do you think there’s any chance of any emergency cascades of stock from anywhere if this worsens, perhaps some of Southern’s loosely diagrammed 455s or some LNR 350/1s? ROSCO isn’t always a complete deal breaker in these circumstances, when enough effort is made. Porterbrook and Angel 156s at Northern are regularly repaired using parts from the other ROSCO, so I’ve heard.
I believe the Southern 455s are very different now, they have diverged during upgrades etc. So effectively a different class.

So any "stopgap" would require all the training etc required with introducing a new class, and that takes considerable time. Therefore file in the "highly unlikely" category.
 

90sWereBetter

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2012
Messages
1,043
Location
Lost somewhere within Bank-Monument tube station,
Potential thick question here, but does "out of miles" refer to units needing an overhaul before they are allowed in service again (which naturally won't be happening given their imminent replacement?)

Have always thought the refurbished SWT/SWR 455s were the gold standard for any EMU stock refurbishment programme, and while they may still be around for a while, I will miss them in south west London when they eventually finish. Must plan more trips on them.

The Southern 455s are not a patch on SWR's fleet imo, definitely not helped by the remodelled front ends, but I'm sure that's a debate that's happened many times before! :lol:
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,957
The Southern 455s are not a patch on SWR's fleet imo, definitely not helped by the remodelled front ends, but I'm sure that's a debate that's happened many times before! :lol:

As per the SR 318s the remodelled SN 455 was to provide cab air conditioning for the driver in the cab.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,577
I believe the Southern 455s are very different now, they have diverged during upgrades etc. So effectively a different class.

So any "stopgap" would require all the training etc required with introducing a new class, and that takes considerable time. Therefore file in the "highly unlikely" category.
The cheapest and quickest solution is to do the necessary work on the units that are out of service.

Do all the class 455s have the same lease end date? I've always thought that the current set up is quite awkward when it comes to fleet replacement. It's difficult to know when the new fleet will start and what teething problems will emerge. In turn It's hard to know how long a lease is required for the old fleet and when each unit will run out of miles. Inevitably the more reliable units in a fleet will run out first which makes the problem worse.
 

sonic2009

Established Member
Joined
19 Jan 2010
Messages
4,921
Location
Crewe
Do you think there’s any chance of any emergency cascades of stock from anywhere if this worsens, perhaps some of Southern’s loosely diagrammed 455s or some LNR 350/1s? ROSCO isn’t always a complete deal breaker in these circumstances, when enough effort is made. Porterbrook and Angel 156s at Northern are regularly repaired using parts from the other ROSCO, so I’ve heard.

Are there spare 350/1s to leave LNWR?
 

Juniper Driver

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Messages
2,074
Location
SWR Metals
I can confirm that 458535 is still sat in the same place in Clapham Yard.
Well I had a word with the shunter today, and he said the unit hasn't moved in 5 months and things are looking very bleak for it…

455905 is also in 15 Road in Clapham Yard on the blocks…scotched up and Not to Be Moved boards.
There was a 455 in front of it today.
 
Joined
25 Oct 2020
Messages
370
Location
Epsom Downs
458512 is back in traffic post C6. It was 13 of 14 class 458 units SWR had to carry out a C6 overhaul on. It entered traffic after 8514 which was unit 14 because of some work arising found.

Well I had a word with the shunter today, and he said the unit hasn't moved in 5 months and things are looking very bleak for it…

455905 is also in 15 Road in Clapham Yard on the blocks…scotched up and Not to Be Moved boards.
There was a 455 in front of it today.
8535 is waiting some parts that can't be delivered until mid-December, nothing bleak about it at all. No point skating down for it not to be repaired and block up the depot and then have to re-skate it to move it around the depot, a waste of money. The first chance it can be skated from Clapham straight onto the bogie drop, I would expect they would get all the work done on it.

Do you think there’s any chance of any emergency cascades of stock from anywhere if this worsens, perhaps some of Southern’s loosely diagrammed 455s or some LNR 350/1s? ROSCO isn’t always a complete deal breaker in these circumstances, when enough effort is made. Porterbrook and Angel 156s at Northern are regularly repaired using parts from the other ROSCO, so I’ve heard.
The ROSCO is not the only parts owner. Unipart Rail owns a lot of the ex-BREL fleet material. TOCs can call off stock from other depots. For example a part for a 158 is needed at Salisbury. Another TOC has one on the shelf. Unipart buy it back and sell it to the TOC that needs it. The displaced item then goes back for repair and if the first TOC has an open order, they will receive it once repaired.
 
Last edited:

Meglos

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2020
Messages
132
Location
london
I've noticed that for the last month or so on a Saturday after the 12:04 departure from Chessington South the service goes from half-hourly to hourly. This is not reflected in the published timetables. Is this a unit shortage, a staffing shortage, or something else.

Sunday's continues to be a half-hourly service throughout the day.
 

swr444

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2021
Messages
392
Location
London
I've noticed that for the last month or so on a Saturday after the 12:04 departure from Chessington South the service goes from half-hourly to hourly. This is not reflected in the published timetables. Is this a unit shortage, a staffing shortage, or something else.

Sunday's continues to be a half-hourly service throughout the day.
This is because of Twickenham matches taking place. They post about it on their website and social media and have lots of announcements playing at stations

Still a lot of short formed 458 sets around. The morning peak 5 cars have been full and standing and leaving passengers behind and many stations
 

Bessie

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
259
What’s the timeline for the cascade of the remaining 14 Class 707’s? Looks like SWR are going to turn this drama into a crisis of their own making. Without repairs being authorised or 701’s being introduced I can see wholesale cancellations happening from early 2022.
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
2,936
What’s the timeline for the cascade of the remaining 14 Class 707’s? Looks like SWR are going to turn this drama into a crisis of their own making. Without repairs being authorised or 701’s being introduced I can see wholesale cancellations happening from early 2022.
It's really a poor state of affairs. There are 13 units sitting in depots out of miles, and the railway in general is putting its fingers in its ears and shouting lalala. If this is directly caused by the late delivery if the 701s, surely Bombardier should be paying for the overhauls of the 455s and 456s. If the delays to the 701s are caused by SWR (a debate on this is for elsewhere) then SWR should be paying for overhauls. One thing is for certain-- somebody should be paying. Doing nothing is unacceptable.

If South Eastern were so desperately short of stock they needed all the 707s imminently, why did they send a large handful of 465s in to store?

There are of course nuances in all this, but in the eyes of the public, there is stock in sidings, and people are getting left behind at stations.
 

swr444

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2021
Messages
392
Location
London
What’s the timeline for the cascade of the remaining 14 Class 707’s? Looks like SWR are going to turn this drama into a crisis of their own making. Without repairs being authorised or 701’s being introduced I can see wholesale cancellations happening from early 2022.
March next year apparently…
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,163
Location
Surrey
It's really a poor state of affairs. There are 13 units sitting in depots out of miles, and the railway in general is putting its fingers in its ears and shouting lalala. If this is directly caused by the late delivery if the 701s, surely Bombardier should be paying for the overhauls of the 455s and 456s. If the delays to the 701s are caused by SWR (a debate on this is for elsewhere) then SWR should be paying for overhauls. One thing is for certain-- somebody should be paying. Doing nothing is unacceptable.

If South Eastern were so desperately short of stock they needed all the 707s imminently, why did they send a large handful of 465s in to store?

There are of course nuances in all this, but in the eyes of the public, there is stock in sidings, and people are getting left behind at stations.
Given the reductions on the main line service groups though there must be some spare 450's that can be redeployed onto the Windsor side?
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,117
Given the reductions on the main line service groups though there must be some spare 450's that can be redeployed onto the Windsor side?
I'm told that's plan, with more 450s on the Reading line.

It's really a poor state of affairs. There are 13 units sitting in depots out of miles, and the railway in general is putting its fingers in its ears and shouting lalala. If this is directly caused by the late delivery if the 701s, surely Bombardier should be paying for the overhauls of the 455s and 456s. If the delays to the 701s are caused by SWR (a debate on this is for elsewhere) then SWR should be paying for overhauls. One thing is for certain-- somebody should be paying. Doing nothing is unacceptable.

If South Eastern were so desperately short of stock they needed all the 707s imminently, why did they send a large handful of 465s in to store?

There are of course nuances in all this, but in the eyes of the public, there is stock in sidings, and people are getting left behind at stations.
You have to remember that the DfT is calling the shots, hence the complete mess.
 

Nogoohwell

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2020
Messages
53
Location
London
The DFT's focus is on the Midlands and North. Treasury is focused on extracting as much cash from the south to cover costs.

In this effort to please Red Wall voters, it feels that the south east in particular is being put to the sword as a show of conviction. While no one denies the rail infrastructure in the North and Midlands needs a lot of investment, the South East has the highest passengers per mile figures so why turn your back on decades of progress, and very good progress by SWT to improve their services and encourage people to travel by train. The thought of a crowded 5 coach train in the morning does not make me want to jump on a train.
 

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
1,688
Location
UK
The DFT's focus is on the Midlands and North. Treasury is focused on extracting as much cash from the south to cover costs.

In this effort to please Red Wall voters, it feels that the south east in particular is being put to the sword as a show of conviction. While no one denies the rail infrastructure in the North and Midlands needs a lot of investment, the South East has the highest passengers per mile figures so why turn your back on decades of progress, and very good progress by SWT to improve their services and encourage people to travel by train. The thought of a crowded 5 coach train in the morning does not make me want to jump on a train.

Perhaps the DfT want to keep alive the fond memories of those 'cosy' pre-Covid southeast commutes!

It's regretful that lower passenger numbers seems to have become an excuse for abandonment of any efforts to keep up standards, doesn't bode at all well.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,117
Perhaps the DfT want to keep alive the fond memories of those 'cosy' pre-Covid southeast commutes!

It's regretful that lower passenger numbers seems to have become an excuse for abandonment of any efforts to keep up standards, doesn't bode at all well.
The pandemic is being used as a convenient excuse to cut standards everywhere.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,117
It's Alstom now.
And I think Alstom would have a fair case for contending that it's not their problem, rather it's an industrial relations problem at SWR.

SWR wanted to start crew training. ASLEF refused, citing various issues that also exist in Aventras that are already in service. Alstom could also point out that GBRF drivers are driving the trains daily despite the reported issues with wipers obscuring signals.

All a good case for suggesting that the impending rolling stock shortage crisis is a problem of SWR's making.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,577
It's really a poor state of affairs. There are 13 units sitting in depots out of miles, and the railway in general is putting its fingers in its ears and shouting lalala. If this is directly caused by the late delivery if the 701s, surely Bombardier should be paying for the overhauls of the 455s and 456s. If the delays to the 701s are caused by SWR (a debate on this is for elsewhere) then SWR should be paying for overhauls. One thing is for certain-- somebody should be paying. Doing nothing is unacceptable.

If South Eastern were so desperately short of stock they needed all the 707s imminently, why did they send a large handful of 465s in to store?

There are of course nuances in all this, but in the eyes of the public, there is stock in sidings, and people are getting left behind at stations.
None of this makes much sense. Were the 465/2 due for overhaul? Seems unlikely that the last few all ran out of miles over the same weekend.

Are the 707s moving to South Eastern when the leases expire or are they being sub leased?
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,193
The DFT's focus is on the Midlands and North. Treasury is focused on extracting as much cash from the south to cover costs.

In this effort to please Red Wall voters, it feels that the south east in particular is being put to the sword as a show of conviction. While no one denies the rail infrastructure in the North and Midlands needs a lot of investment, the South East has the highest passengers per mile figures so why turn your back on decades of progress, and very good progress by SWT to improve their services and encourage people to travel by train. The thought of a crowded 5 coach train in the morning does not make me want to jump on a train.
The Tory party may just find the Blue Wall crumbling massively if they are dumb enough to think that the South will pay through the nose and get nothing.

It's really a poor state of affairs. There are 13 units sitting in depots out of miles, and the railway in general is putting its fingers in its ears and shouting lalala. If this is directly caused by the late delivery if the 701s, surely Bombardier should be paying for the overhauls of the 455s and 456s. If the delays to the 701s are caused by SWR (a debate on this is for elsewhere) then SWR should be paying for overhauls. One thing is for certain-- somebody should be paying. Doing nothing is unacceptable.

If South Eastern were so desperately short of stock they needed all the 707s imminently, why did they send a large handful of 465s in to store?

There are of course nuances in all this, but in the eyes of the public, there is stock in sidings, and people are getting left behind at stations.
You are, of course, assuming that the 465s in store are fit to continue running. There are reports that they are In a bad way.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,302
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
None of this makes much sense. Were the 465/2 due for overhaul? Seems unlikely that the last few all ran out of miles over the same weekend.

Are the 707s moving to South Eastern when the leases expire or are they being sub leased?
Subleased. All of the 707 fleet is now leased to South Eastern under whatever name they are this week, and subleased back to SWR.
 

Top