But in the UK we do make provisions for minorities.
We could save money by ignoring the needs of disabled travellers BUT we do not ignore them and we should not.
I wonder how many people have a weak bladder ?.
Should they avoid public transport ?.
Since toilets on These train services have been there for a while then what progress is being made by REMOVING them ?.
Given all metro systems around the UK (London Underground, Manchester Metro and even some mainline London services) don't have toilets on board I would think a legal challenge would have been made a long time ago if people were actively being discriminated against.
Providing the station provision is there and well maintained everyone is catered for, especially with the increased service frequency. I don't mind getting off the use the loo if the next train is in 5 minutes but would mind if it was 30 minutes
And if you honestly can't go 20 minutes without needing the loo, not having them onboard trains is going to be the least of your problems independence wise given how few public toilets there are in society in general these days.
The progress is the increased space onboard for everyone and the related improvements in capacity and frequency that I doubt you could get with traditional trains.
But ultimately this is a done deal now and people just need to move on rather than focusing on one area where things have gone backwards when it's going forward in lots of other areas. It's not going to change now the investment has been made, the time to engage with TfW on the matter has long gone.