• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Wigan-Bolton electrification. Construction updates only please

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
3 Mar 2020
Messages
497
Location
Furness
There's a report in the local paper about a campaign to install platforms on the Wigan branch at Lostock. Would make sense to do that at the same time as electrification, but I don't suppose it's in the plans?
They talked about doing this 30 years ago ( or whenever it was) as the other platforms were being constructed. Obviously there's a lot more housing been built in the mean time. I think the PTE said that one service each way per hour would suffice.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,116
They talked about doing this 30 years ago ( or whenever it was) as the other platforms were being constructed. Obviously there's a lot more housing been built in the mean time. I think the PTE said that one service each way per hour would suffice.
That's just what we are getting at the moment off-peak. Used to be two. No idea if they will return to 2 tph, really wish they would as I would use it. There's a new bus the 573/574 which stops within 10 mins walking distance, I could use that to Lostock but the timings are totally out of sync. Unfortunately buses can't get any closer (unless they u-turn as bustitutions do) as the bridge has limited access now and buses are probably too heavy.
Any news on strengthening that bridge at lostock?
 
Joined
3 Mar 2020
Messages
497
Location
Furness
That's just what we are getting at the moment off-peak. Used to be two. No idea if they will return to 2 tph, really wish they would as I would use it. There's a new bus the 573/574 which stops within 10 mins walking distance, I could use that to Lostock but the timings are totally out of sync. Unfortunately buses can't get any closer (unless they u-turn as bustitutions do) as the bridge has limited access now and buses are probably too heavy.
Any news on strengthening that bridge at lostock?
I think I had to take a long walk from the bus stop on Chorley New Road to have a look at the station being built and the signal box. It was right at the far end of where the car park is now. The SB was on borrowed time by then. I can't remember what state the bridges were in. It was 30 years ago....
 

PDG1949

Member
Joined
21 May 2014
Messages
323
Location
St. Helens, Merseyside
Whilst waiting for news on the current electrification progress, I came across these two items on YouTube about 769s which might be of interest.

The first is a presentation about the 769 Flex, which goes into some illustrated detail on the conversion of a 319 by Aidan Diver


The second is a ride from Alderley Edge through to Southport on a 769. Unfortunately it's a 'passenger window' and not a 'cab' ride

 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
How is Lostock Junction on the Bolton to Manchester corridor? It’s north of Bolton!

The Bolton-Manchester corridor actually runs to Preston and Blackburn. Its name refers to the direction of approach into Manchester city centre.
 

LDECRexile

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2014
Messages
2,149
Location
Southport, UK
Bridge 7 has been completed and formally opened by local schoolgirls (after appropriate training on how to safely cut a ribbon.)

Wrinkley and I passed under it yesterday, it looks the biz.

The only other sign of work on the route visible from a train is clearance work around a bridge nearer Lostock.

The great news was made public in "Modern Railways" April 2022 pp26-27 which stated that following vigorous review "...only one bridge will require reconstruction for electrical clearance. Two more will need to be reconstructed because of condition. At a stroke this has reduced the cost to under £15 million."

Apologies if this has already been discussed. The article is a must for anyone who has despaired at the cost of schemes and the hammer blow it has dealt to a widespread or even infill electrification programme.

Whist it is technically off thread, we noticed that the 769 ran on diesel throughout from Wigan to Stalybridge, including under the wires. Wrinkley understands there has been an electrical interference issue with signals.
 

PDG1949

Member
Joined
21 May 2014
Messages
323
Location
St. Helens, Merseyside
Bridge 7 has been completed and formally opened by local schoolgirls (after appropriate training on how to safely cut a ribbon.)

Wrinkley and I passed under it yesterday, it looks the biz.

The only other sign of work on the route visible from a train is clearance work around a bridge nearer Lostock.

The great news was made public in "Modern Railways" April 2022 pp26-27 which stated that following vigorous review "...only one bridge will require reconstruction for electrical clearance. Two more will need to be reconstructed because of condition. At a stroke this has reduced the cost to under £15 million."

Apologies if this has already been discussed. The article is a must for anyone who has despaired at the cost of schemes and the hammer blow it has dealt to a widespread or even infill electrification programme.

Whist it is technically off thread, we noticed that the 769 ran on diesel throughout from Wigan to Stalybridge, including under the wires. Wrinkley understands there has been an electrical interference issue with signals.
Great news ! I wonder if this will speed things up and maybe the job might be finished earlier ??
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,111
Location
Leeds
Apart from the replacement of Chew Moor bridge, has anything visible happened on this project?
 

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,982
Location
Southport
I’ve been on the line recently and was thinking the same thing. There’s nothing obvious I can see other than the new bridge to the farmer’s field and Sunday service seems to have resumed, when it’s supposed to be engineering possessions every Sunday for electrification.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,111
Location
Leeds
The most favourable interpretation I can put on the evidence is that they had this period pencilled in for further bridge alterations but decided they were unnecessary (see #125) and that actual electrification work will follow on after Stalybridge is completed - whenever that may be.
 

Gricer99

Member
Joined
21 Jun 2020
Messages
256
Location
Hindley
I've heard locally that the bridge at Hindley Station will be completely renewed, necessitating the closure of Hall Lane and Ladies Lane at the station for 4 to 6 weeks and a very long traffic diversion via Aspull and Whelley or Westhoughton. Can anyone confirm this?
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,254
Location
Surrey
I'd forgotten about the piece of electrification and certainly hasn't generating the posts MML and East Kilbride is.
 

td97

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2017
Messages
1,447
I've heard locally that the bridge at Hindley Station will be completely renewed
The soffit height is significantly below the minimum for OLE routes.
This project is taking advantage of Voltage Clearance Control studies/modelling, but unfortunately not every bridge can be saved.
The good news is that the project team is taking a hard stance against maintenance who have neglected assets in expectation of the electrification project picking up the bill for overdue structure replacements (à la GWEP & NWEP).
I'd forgotten about the piece of electrification and certainly hasn't generating the posts MML and East Kilbride is.
That may be because the only visible thing to have happened on the ground to date is one bridge replacement.
Piling is due to start at the beginning of next year
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,254
Location
Surrey
The good news is that the project team is taking a hard stance against maintenance who have neglected assets in expectation of the electrification project picking up the bill for overdue structure replacements (à la GWEP & NWEP).
Thats good but risks further disruption when those assets need attention so whilst i totally agree it shouldn't be contributing to the electrification cost there really ought to be total route view being taken.
 

Mollman

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2016
Messages
1,489
Thats good but risks further disruption when those assets need attention so whilst i totally agree it shouldn't be contributing to the electrification cost there really ought to be total route view being taken.
Depends what stance they are taking. Sensible approach would be to just bill maintenance for work they should have undertaken but left to electrification team to do.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
I've heard locally that the bridge at Hindley Station will be completely renewed, necessitating the closure of Hall Lane and Ladies Lane at the station for 4 to 6 weeks and a very long traffic diversion via Aspull and Whelley or Westhoughton. Can anyone confirm this?

At Daisy Hill the bridge deck is worn out and needs replacing (those bollards arent protecting pedestrians they are limiting how many vehicles can occupy it), the height would also have been raised for future electrification. Bolton Council were supposed to lead on procurement and a 12 month road closure planning permission was granted in early 2020 but nothing happened. Would have involved a many mile diversion of over half an hour.

Then mid 2021 Network Rail decided that it could still take 40 tons for a few more years as long as the vehicles were in the centre of the bridge and therefore it didn't need urgent replacement.
 
Last edited:

Geeves

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2009
Messages
2,328
Location
Rochdale
The extra issue at Daisy Hill is that the station building is connected to the road bridge at the high level and will presumably need to go? Not an issue for wires for now I suppose. I am interested in the final plans for Hindley too
 

td97

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2017
Messages
1,447
There seems to be a lot of confusion after Daisy Hill was brought up. Yes that is Hindley station, but your photo is a wall at the side of the station building.

The "problem" bridge is the masonry arch bridge at the station front. There's good context with the compliant footbridge in the foreground from this view
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,111
Location
Leeds
There seems to be a lot of confusion after Daisy Hill was brought up. Yes that is Hindley station, but your photo is a wall at the side of the station building.

The "problem" bridge is the masonry arch bridge at the station front. There's good context with the compliant footbridge in the foreground from this view
and seen from the road it looks like this, with the bollards that Watcher may have been thinking of:


Daisy Hill is on nearby but on the Atherton line (off topic) and looks like this:

 

scragend

Member
Joined
27 Feb 2016
Messages
182
and seen from the road it looks like this, with the bollards that Watcher may have been thinking of:


Daisy Hill is on nearby but on the Atherton line (off topic) and looks like this:


The bollards in the photo outside Hindley station are nothing to do with the bridge; they are traffic calming measures and there are several sets all the way down Ladies Lane.

WatcherZero was referring to the bollards/barriers outside Daisy Hill, which yes is off topic as far as the Wigan-Bolton electrification is concerned. But I didn't know that they were there to limit traffic on the bridge (presumably preventing people from stopping outside the station building). I assumed they'd been put there when all the rail replacement buses were running, so that people could queue for the buses behind them.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Kinda, the bollards at Daisy Hill are there to stop vehicles driving onto the pavement as the bridges outer deck spans cannot take the weight (under the road surface the bridge is a trapezoid formed of 4 longitudal deck spans, the two outer ones are supporting the bridge parapets and cant take additional vehicle weight).

Had a look and no planning applications or road closure notices for Hindley bridge works yet.
 
Last edited:

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
9,337
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
There seems to be a lot of confusion after Daisy Hill was brought up. Yes that is Hindley station, but your photo is a wall at the side of the station building.
Thanks for the clarification. I know money is tight but it sure would make sense to me if repairs such as this etc could all happen during the upgrade.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,011
Location
Bristol
Thanks for the clarification. I know money is tight but it sure would make sense to me if repairs such as this etc could all happen during the upgrade.
When NR rebuild a bridge and improvements are made, will NR only pay the price of what was there with the additional costs (small they may be) being supplied from elsewhere, or will NR foot the bill for the whole lot?

Apologies if this should really go in a new thread.
 

AMD

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2017
Messages
678
Piling is due to start at the beginning of next year
Possibly sooner, there were overnight possessions this past week and there are patches in the cess about every 50m where ground clearance has taken place ready for piling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top