• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

WMR Class 196 Build and Implementation

Status
Not open for further replies.

nigelsporne

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2012
Messages
239
Will the 196s be rebranded? Any news on whether they may venture in the future towards Bedford?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,530
Location
Croydon
I would expect the EWR 196s to be rebranded and it’s rather early to say about Bedford - perhaps let’s see them in service between Oxford and Milton Keynes first!
My feeling is that by the time the short platforms issue on Bedford to Bletchley are resolved * new EWR stock will have been looked at. As in a long way off.

* = I recall (in this thread or another) it is not as simple as lengthening platforms or Selective Door Opening. There are level crossings and signals to consider. Level crossings blocked by the rear of a longer train OR Signals at the front that would have to be moved with lengthened platforms.
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
1,927
Location
South Staffordshire
My feeling is that by the time the short platforms issue on Bedford to Bletchley are resolved * new EWR stock will have been looked at. As in a long way off.

* = I recall (in this thread or another) it is not as simple as lengthening platforms or Selective Door Opening. There are level crossings and signals to consider. Level crossings blocked by the rear of a longer train OR Signals at the front that would have to be moved with lengthened platforms.
exactly. Which is why DfT had to strike a deal for 2x20m 150/1s to get passenger services back, after the financial collapse of Vivarail support for 230003-230005.
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
1,945
Location
All around the network
My feeling is that by the time the short platforms issue on Bedford to Bletchley are resolved * new EWR stock will have been looked at. As in a long way off.

* = I recall (in this thread or another) it is not as simple as lengthening platforms or Selective Door Opening. There are level crossings and signals to consider. Level crossings blocked by the rear of a longer train OR Signals at the front that would have to be moved with lengthened platforms.
It is possible they could run nonstop Bletchley to Bedford in the meantime, if they found passengers would use a service though I'm not sure how easy it would be to path a stopping service around it.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
It is possible they could run nonstop Bletchley to Bedford in the meantime, if they found passengers would use a service though I'm not sure how easy it would be to path a stopping service around it.

Since EWR services are not predicted to reach Bedford for at least another 5 years I’m not sure what you consider to be ‘in the meantime’. It would also be a waste of a 100mph unit trundling along at 60mph to Bedford before the necessary route upgrade is complete.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,530
Location
Croydon
Since EWR services are not predicted to reach Bedford for at least another 5 years I’m not sure what you consider to be ‘in the meantime’. It would also be a waste of a 100mph unit trundling along at 60mph to Bedford before the necessary route upgrade is complete.
Oh yes, it is not for the near future. In fact I would consider the promise of 100mph services to East of Bedford being the incentive to sort out the Bedford - Bletchley line with fewer stations but longer platforms. But I think that has been discussed in another thread.
 

boxerdog

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2016
Messages
76
Since EWR services are not predicted to reach Bedford for at least another 5 years I’m not sure what you consider to be ‘in the meantime’. It would also be a waste of a 100mph unit trundling along at 60mph to Bedford before the necessary route upgrade is complete.
WMR Class 196s are limited to 90mph
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
No, WMR 196s are limited to 90mph and are set up to run in 'ECO' mode as there are other operational modes available.
It may well be that WMR have modified the TCMS software to reduce the speed the limit kicks in at from 100 to 90, in the same way they have locked the other operational modes? There is nowhere on the 196s current network with a line speed higher than 90 - but obviously that will change when they go to EWR.
 

HLE

Established Member
Joined
27 Dec 2013
Messages
1,416
It may well be that WMR have modified the TCMS software to reduce the speed the limit kicks in at from 100 to 90, in the same way they have locked the other operational modes? There is nowhere on the 196s current network with a line speed higher than 90 - but obviously that will change when they go to EWR.

There is - ECS moves from Leamington to Tyseley, 100mph linespeed in places, and as boxerdog says the power cuts off at 90 automatically.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,530
Location
Croydon
There is - ECS moves from Leamington to Tyseley, 100mph linespeed in places, and as boxerdog says the power cuts off at 90 automatically.
It is possible that the six 196/0s (007 to 012) are or will be modified to allow them to run at up to 100mph ?.
 

HLE

Established Member
Joined
27 Dec 2013
Messages
1,416
There are a couple of 4 car car sets that havent been limited yet, and will run past 90mph.

Interesting, one to keep quiet!

It is possible that the six 196/0s (007 to 012) are or will be modified to allow them to run at up to 100mph ?.

I've no idea, but it's not hard to change the power modes so I would imagine it's the same story for the limiter. I suppose it depends on Chiltern and how they intend to run them.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
There is - ECS moves from Leamington to Tyseley, 100mph linespeed in places, and as boxerdog says the power cuts off at 90 automatically.
Ah yes, I'd gone through the whole network in my head but forgotten that they need to get to and from Leamington some how.
Interesting, one to keep quiet!



I've no idea, but it's not hard to change the power modes so I would imagine it's the same story for the limiter. I suppose it depends on Chiltern and how they intend to run them.
I would be surprised and disappointed if they didn't tweak the software given they'll spend most of their life on a 100mph line, it can't be that hard to do. Assuming they have the same performance as a 197 then even in eco mode they'll do 100 fairly easily.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
No, WMR 196s are limited to 90mph and are set up to run in 'ECO' mode as there are other operational modes available.

Since EWR services will be timed for 100mph operation you can be sure that the 90mph 'ECO' restriction will not be used and the units will run in one of the other operational modes. As I understand it the change of mode is very simple to achieve.

It is possible that the six 196/0s (007 to 012) are or will be modified to allow them to run at up to 100mph ?.

See above

WMR Class 196s are limited to 90mph

The EWR units won't be.
 
Last edited:

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
Since EWR services will be timed for 100mph operation you can be sure that the 90mph 'ECO' restriction will not be used and the units will run in one of the other operational modes. As I understand it the change of mode is very simple to achieve.



See above



The EWR units won't be.
Assuming it's the same set up as 197s, the speed limiter and eco mode are separate things. Eco mode doesn't change the speed limiter, it just changes through the gears earlier than in the higher modes. They'll get to 100 in eco mode, it's just they'll get there quicker in the other modes. And in all modes, they won't go any faster than 101.

By the sound of things, WMR have changed the software so the speed limiter kicks in at 90.
 

boxerdog

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2016
Messages
76
Since EWR services will be timed for 100mph operation you can be sure that the 90mph 'ECO' restriction will not be used and the units will run in one of the other operational modes. As I understand it the change of mode is very simple to achieve.



See above



The EWR units won't be.
90mph isn't ECO, ECO is an operating mode which is to do with gear changes & engine revs - if I remember correctly.

Unit operational modes are:

ECO = Economic
NOR = Normal
PW = Power
SPW = Super Power

As for the 90mph limit being in place still, depends on the timings as the 196 is quite a quick diesel unit (not quite as fast as 172s in the current mode).

Ultimately East to West can do what they like as they have dedicated sublease units.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
90mph isn't ECO, ECO is an operating mode which is to do with gear changes & engine revs - if I remember correctly.

Unit operational modes are:

ECO = Economic
NOR = Normal
PW = Power
SPW = Super Power

As for the 90mph limit being in place still, depends on the timings as the 196 is quite a quick diesel unit (not quite as fast as 172s in the current mode).

Ultimately East to West can do what they like as they have dedicated sublease units.

Understood. The timings for EWR rely on 100mph line speed being maintained and clearly a 90mph restriction is not going to achieve that so these units will be running at 100mph on EWR services.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
90mph isn't ECO, ECO is an operating mode which is to do with gear changes & engine revs - if I remember correctly.

Unit operational modes are:

ECO = Economic
NOR = Normal
PW = Power
SPW = Super Power
You remember correctly.
Understood. The timings for EWR rely on 100mph line speed being maintained and clearly a 90mph restriction is not going to achieve that so these units will be running at 100mph on EWR services.
Given the relatively short distances between stations and the time it takes a DMU to accelerate to 100mph, I doubt 90 Vs 100 would really make a whole lot of difference. A 197 in eco mode takes about 5 minutes to get to 100, and the longest gap between stations on EWR is only 9 minutes, judging by the times on RTT.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
You remember correctly.

Given the relatively short distances between stations and the time it takes a DMU to accelerate to 100mph, I doubt 90 Vs 100 would really make a whole lot of difference. A 197 in eco mode takes about 5 minutes to get to 100, and the longest gap between stations on EWR is only 9 minutes, judging by the times on RTT.

Whatever. If the timetable is planned for 100mph units then that's what is required. Even a minute late access to the WCML at certain times of the day could impact on several other trains.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,530
Location
Croydon
Whatever. If the timetable is planned for 100mph units then that's what is required. Even a minute late access to the WCML at certain times of the day could impact on several other trains.
Indeed. I can see paths on the WCML being too valuable to waste on a 90mph unit when 100mph was already possible on 196s before they were made more "economical" !. I expect the ECO mode itself might not be relied upon as 196s will need to accelerate in amongst AC EMUs.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,504
Do you know how much time Super Power can save there (or is it not significant)?
It's definitely noticeable - probably about a minute or so? It's hard to say, there's so much variation between fully functional units and units with one or more engines producing reduced power for various reasons. Plus the 3 car units accelerate better than the 2 cars. But on a fully functional unit, I'd say that's pretty close.
Indeed. I can see paths on the WCML being too valuable to waste on a 90mph unit when 100mph was already possible on 196s before they were made more "economical" !. I expect the ECO mode itself might not be relied upon as 196s will need to accelerate in amongst AC EMUs.
It's 3 miles from Bletchley to Milton Keynes. Even without the restrictive signalling that's likely to be in place to access the bay at Milton Keynes (and potentially the junction at Bletchley, depending on how it's been set up), it doesn't matter if it's in eco mode or superpower, it's probably not getting above 90.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,530
Location
Croydon
.....................................

It's 3 miles from Bletchley to Milton Keynes. Even without the restrictive signalling that's likely to be in place to access the bay at Milton Keynes (and potentially the junction at Bletchley, depending on how it's been set up), it doesn't matter if it's in eco mode or superpower, it's probably not getting above 90.
Good point !.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
It's 3 miles from Bletchley to Milton Keynes. Even without the restrictive signalling that's likely to be in place to access the bay at Milton Keynes (and potentially the junction at Bletchley, depending on how it's been set up), it doesn't matter if it's in eco mode or superpower, it's probably not getting above 90.

No probably about it. It's the potential for delay west of Bletchley that's the issue, not the 90mph vs. 100mph capability on the WCML. An MKC-bound EWR train presenting even a minute late at Denbigh Hall South Junction is less than ideal.
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
1,927
Location
South Staffordshire
No probably about it. It's the potential for delay west of Bletchley that's the issue, not the 90mph vs. 100mph capability on the WCML. An MKC-bound EWR train presenting even a minute late at Denbigh Hall South Junction is less than ideal.
Which is yet another reason why EWR should have been electrified. They could have leased 350/2s which
Probably out-accelerate a 196/0
Kinda to the environment
Could be serviced locally - unless 007-012 are divorced from Tyseley

Yeah I know !!!!
 

Doomotron

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,360
Location
Kent
Which is yet another reason why EWR should have been electrified. They could have leased 350/2s which
Probably out-accelerate a 196/0
Kinda to the environment
Could be serviced locally - unless 007-012 are divorced from Tyseley

Yeah I know !!!!
They wouldn't be much use on the Chiltern...
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
They wouldn't be much use on the Chiltern...

But the 196s won't be used on Chiltern either, apart from going to Tyseley for maintenance. EWR is a self-contained railway and if it had been electrified from the start with EMUs used, maintenance would have been done at Bletchley.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top