• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Oxford Corridor Phase 2 & Platform 5 updates

Edvid

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
1,841
Work to connect the new Thames Water main starts tomorrow.

Oxfordshire Connect newsletter (15 November update)

On Monday (18 November) Thames Water are due to start work to complete the connection of the new water main on the western side of the bridge. This follows on from the ground investigation work during October to identify a suitable location.

The first phase of work will be taking place at the entrance to the bus turning area, opposite the Mill Street junction by The One restaurant (see diagram below.) This is planned to continue until 30 November.
[...]
Phase 2 of the work will see the road closed between Abbey Road and Mill Street, with all traffic being diverted via Abbey Road. This is planned to start on 1 December.

Work will be paused over the Christmas period, between 20 December and 6 January. During this time parking restrictions will be removed.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Nicholas43

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2011
Messages
573
Has any forum member tried out GWR's offer that, given notice, you can be let out, or in, through the gate from platform 4 to Roger Dudman Way?
 
Last edited:

rocrat

Member
Joined
19 Apr 2024
Messages
90
Location
Thetford
Has any forum member tried out GWR's offer that, given notice, you can be let out or in through the gate from platform 4 to Roger Dudman Way?
This is often left open anyway at the moment! Does/can one call GWR to specifically request this?

I had assumed it was just due to peak time overcrowding...
 

Nicholas43

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2011
Messages
573
This is often left open anyway at the moment! Does/can one call GWR to specifically request this?

I had assumed it was just due to peak time overcrowding...
The Oxfordshire Connect newsletter says that:
Due to the work affecting access to the station entrance, in exceptional circumstances, and during dedicated times, GWR are providing passenger assistance from the west side of the station.

This is reachable via a signposted vehicular drop off/pick up point on Roger Dudman Way. Please allow a minimum of 30-40 minutes for passenger assistance from this side to enable staff to get you to your train on time. Operating times for this service will be 07:30 – 21:00 Monday to Friday, and 08:00 – 21:00 on Saturday and Sunday.
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
2,136
Location
East Midlands
Any bets on delays if when TW go under?
Recent reports suggest they'll stagger on for at least a few more months, hopefully these works will be done in that time. Hopefully.

Link to relevant FT article, relevant quote follows:

Britain’s largest water utility, which is already struggling under a £19bn debt mountain, said on Wednesday that it had approval from a majority of its lenders to take out a new £3bn loan.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,624
Recent reports suggest they'll stagger on for at least a few more months, hopefully these works will be done in that time. Hopefully.

Link to relevant FT article, relevant quote follows:
There is a pause in works at Christmas which provides the opportunity for a very delayed restart in the new year.
That loan is merely licking the can down the road for while.

Though as NR are paying them to do the work it might stay near the top of TW's priority list.
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,554
Location
Taunton or Kent
There is a pause in works at Christmas which provides the opportunity for a very delayed restart in the new year.
That loan is merely licking the can down the road for while.

Though as NR are paying them to do the work it might stay near the top of TW's priority list.
If they go under while these works are ongoing how quickly could whoever takes over resume them? Giving TW are providing a critical service, they'll have to be an emergency nationalisation/administrator deployment imminently.
 

DavidGrain

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2017
Messages
1,358
If they go under while these works are ongoing how quickly could whoever takes over resume them? Giving TW are providing a critical service, they'll have to be an emergency nationalisation/administrator deployment imminently.
Water supply and sewerage are essential activities which will need to be kept going. This work might not be regarded as essential.
 

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
1,828
There is a pause in works at Christmas which provides the opportunity for a very delayed restart in the new year.
That loan is merely licking the can down the road for while.

Though as NR are paying them to do the work it might stay near the top of TW's priority list.
Why should National Rail, ie us, the taxpayer, the rail passenger (and freight customer/) be paying?

Is this not (another?) example of inadequate 'site investigation' and inordinate and unnecessary race to 'get started' after long-awaited approval to spend is received, rather as the GW Electrification project delays, redesigns and overspends which gave rise to Oxord electrification dither and delay, cutbacks, cancellation and reinstatement ...
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,624
Why should National Rail, ie us, the taxpayer, the rail passenger (and freight customer/) be paying?

Is this not (another?) example of inadequate 'site investigation' and inordinate and unnecessary race to 'get started' after long-awaited approval to spend is received, rather as the GW Electrification project delays, redesigns and overspends which gave rise to Oxord electrification dither and delay, cutbacks, cancellation and reinstatement ...
The council didn't want the road closures to do pre-investigation work...
The council's records of what was underneath the road were also inaccurate.

NR will ultimately being paying for all the TW work.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
14,977
Location
Bristol
The council didn't want the road closures to do pre-investigation work...
The council's records of what was underneath the road were also inaccurate.

NR will ultimately being paying for all the TW work.
Will NR have recourse to the council for inaccurate information extending the works?
 

Doctor Fegg

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2010
Messages
2,126
Location
Charlbury
The council's records of what was underneath the road were also inaccurate.
I think "incomplete" would be a more appropriate word than "inaccurate", given that no one knew about the extent of an arch that was put in some 200 years ago.

I'm not sure that the railway infrastructure owner is in a great place to criticise local councils for incomplete documentation of what lies underground given their own travails during the Great Western electrification ("whoops, we appear to have piled through some signalling cables, wonder who put them there").
 

Nicholas43

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2011
Messages
573
Will NR have recourse to the council for inaccurate information extending the works?
There is, or was, a National Underground Asset Register project. Meanwhile, utilities are supposed to have their own records. I don't think we can blame the highway authority.
 

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
1,828
Who is the 'Employer' in contract terms; and who the 'contract administrator' in terms that were in use 'back in the day'? Some body is responsible. Some body must pay. One near certainty is that so much is 'at stake' that (expensive) legal departments will be commissioning (expensive) legal representatives to 'defend' their client and to lay blame at some other body's door. Were the risks that this would occur suitably assessed and provision made via insurances, indemnities and legally enforceable 'get out clauses' etc.

I am wondering whether, with the benefit of hindsight (!) Platform 4 could have been moved northward so that a Platform 5 could have been be served from a Down line junction staring beyond Botley Road, leaving the bridge and road 'intact'?
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
3,518
I am wondering whether, with the benefit of hindsight (!) Platform 4 could have been moved northward so that a Platform 5 could have been be served from a Down line junction staring beyond Botley Road, leaving the bridge and road 'intact'?
That would have been extremely short-sighted. The clearance under the current bridge is very poor, necessitating shorter than usual double-decker buses to be able to use it. There is also a future aspiration that Platform 2 may become through instead of a bay if the main station building is rebuilt, the bridge has been designed with this in mind for the future.
 

InTheEastMids

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
967
This seems like a relative
The council didn't want the road closures to do pre-investigation work...
The council's records of what was underneath the road were also inaccurate.
In a nutshell, this is a reason behind delays and cost increases for all sorts of infrastructure projects. For various different reasons, contractors are appointed and things kick off with too many unknowns. Then something unforeseen is discovered and the redesigns, compensation events/variations and delays start mounting up. This observation is basically a standard feature of any report that tries to answer the question of why infrastructure projects cost so much.

There is, or was, a National Underground Asset Register project
This is quite a recent development, and probably will only cover "known knowns", so isn't going to help when there was something down there that nobody knew anything about.
 

DavidGrain

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2017
Messages
1,358
Will NR have recourse to the council for inaccurate information extending the works?
Unlikely. There is no evidence that the council misled or were negligent in the information that they gave to NR.
 

BlueLeanie

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2023
Messages
446
Location
Haddenham
There is, or was, a National Underground Asset Register project. Meanwhile, utilities are supposed to have their own records. I don't think we can blame the highway authority.
If the pipes were originally installed by Berkshire, Oxfordshire or Oxford Municipal Councils in the 19th century, then then the finger points that way.

Or perhaps a canal channel, maybe a lade for industry, looking at old maps there was a University power station down that way, a gas works, metal castings factory. Brunel himself might have designed the arch!
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
Who is the 'Employer' in contract terms; and who the 'contract administrator' in terms that were in use 'back in the day'? Some body is responsible. Some body must pay. One near certainty is that so much is 'at stake' that (expensive) legal departments will be commissioning (expensive) legal representatives to 'defend' their client and to lay blame at some other body's door. Were the risks that this would occur suitably assessed and provision made via insurances, indemnities and legally enforceable 'get out clauses' etc.

I am wondering whether, with the benefit of hindsight (!) Platform 4 could have been moved northward so that a Platform 5 could have been be served from a Down line junction staring beyond Botley Road, leaving the bridge and road 'intact'?

This has already been covered in a previous post which suggested the same 'solution'. Moving or even just shortening Platform 4 at the south end is really a non-starter.
 

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
1,828
This has already been covered in a previous post which suggested the same 'solution'. Moving or even just shortening Platform 4 at the south end is really a non-starter.
Thank you; 290 posts over a couple of years is some number to trawl back through!
 

Oxfordblues

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2013
Messages
847
A local councillor recently asked on a West Oxford Whatsapp group when exactly Botley Road would reopen to through traffic. (It is 6 miles from Binsey Lane to the station according to the AA Routeplanner.) I helpfully replied that installation of the new bridge requires a 7-day rail blockade for which the lead-time will be at least 18 months. So I suggested the project might be complete in mid- to late-2026. They were unsurprisingly horrified!
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
17,550
A local councillor recently asked on a West Oxford Whatsapp group when exactly Botley Road would reopen to through traffic. (It is 6 miles from Binsey Lane to the station according to the AA Routeplanner.) I helpfully replied that installation of the new bridge requires a 7-day rail blockade for which the lead-time will be at least 18 months. So I suggested the project might be complete in mid- to late-2026. They were unsurprisingly horrified!
Binsey Lane is odd place to choose.
 

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
1,828
Binsey Lane is odd place to choose.
It doesn't seem 'odd' to me. IIRC folk from Binsey Lane may well want or need, for whatever reason, to reach the Station or thereabouts by car and have now along journey 'round the houses' whether via Marston Ferry Road or Donnington Bridge Road or the Ring Road, each of which is a long way round!! It may be the place of maximum inconvenience, esp considering the traffic too!
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
17,550
It doesn't seem 'odd' to me. IIRC folk from Binsey Lane may well want or need, for whatever reason, to reach the Station or thereabouts by car and have now along journey 'round the houses' whether via Marston Ferry Road or Donnington Bridge Road or the Ring Road, each of which is a long way round!! It may be the place of maximum inconvenience, esp considering the traffic too!
Its odd as there is nothing up there.
 

Nicholas43

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2011
Messages
573

NickBucks

Member
Joined
17 May 2013
Messages
217
Is the water main the last utility to be moved and if so what is the plan going forward ? Is anyone on this forum with insider knowledge able to give a time frame, give or take say three months, when Botley Road might re-open, the new bridge installed and traffic around Oxford can get back to normal ? I assume the City / County Council would be looking for the planning / preparation period (18 months ?) to be a time when Botley Road can be re-opened with only a short term closure for the actual bridge to be put in place.
 

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
1,828
Apart from all the houses at the bottom end, Binsey itself, and the depot for the electric delivery bikes too.

and has The Perch closed?

Is the water main the last utility to be moved and if so what is the plan going forward ? Is anyone on this forum with insider knowledge able to give a time frame, give or take say three months, when Botley Road might re-open, the new bridge installed and traffic around Oxford can get back to normal ? I assume the City / County Council would be looking for the planning / preparation period (18 months ?) to be a time when Botley Road can be re-opened with only a short term closure for the actual bridge to be put in place.
This bridge was sadly, and perhaps predictably, a bridge too far.
 

Top