• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Surely the case is now much stronger for Bere Alston - Tavistock - Okehampton!

simonw

Member
Joined
7 Dec 2009
Messages
796
If I have it right, the case [EDIT- back in the '60s] for keeping open the line as it currently is (Plymouth- Gunnislake via Bere Alston) is primarily that the roads thereabouts were not conducive as alternatives to the rail journey- whether too long, too narrow, hilly etc I don't know perhaps there are notes of meetings, deliberations and decisions of the Transport Users Consultative Committee that might shed light? I would say that little has changed in the years since the Beeching 'reprieve', except the roads are busier. Perhaps a service pattern Plymouth- Gunnislake via Tavistock might be made to work? Maybe not.
The line was retained because the roads weren't suitable for bus service. AFAIK this is still the case.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
2,952
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
The line was retained because the roads weren't suitable for bus service. AFAIK this is still the case.
The line was retained because there aren't any roads crossing the Rivers Tamar and Tavy downstream (other than at Saltash) to provide useful bus services, but the retained railway line does bridge these rivers to provide a connection to Plymouth. The opening of the road bridge at Saltash enabled a Plymouth to Callington bus service, so the Callington branch could be curtailed to Gunnislake. There is an hourly bus service from Tavistock to Bere Alston, with occasional extensions to Bere Ferrers, but it doesn't cross the Rivers Tamar and Tavy. This bus service, and the frequent direct bus service from Tavistock direct to Plymouth via another route, weaken the case for re-opening the Bere Alston-Tavistock line.
 
Last edited:

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,425
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
The line was retained because there aren't any roads crossing the Rivers Tamar and Tavy downstream (other than at Saltash) to provide useful bus services, but the retained railway line does bridge these rivers to provide a connection to Plymouth. The opening of the road bridge at Saltash enabled a Plymouth to Callington bus service, so the Callington branch could be curtailed to Gunnislake. There is an hourly bus service from Tavistock to Bere Alston, with occasional extensions to Bere Ferrers, but it doesn't cross the Rivers Tamar and Tavy.
Somewhat to a different area, but on the same subject, even though at Conwy, there were both road and rail crossings of the river, they decided still to build a road tunnel under the river when the A55 road improvement scheme was taking place.
 

Class172

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
3,777
Location
West Country
Was there any damage to the station at Okehampton during the recent bad weather?
I believe I read in another thread that the recent winds associated with storm Henk managed to rip the roof off the pedestrian footbridge.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,046
Location
Yorks
Service trains only use the up platform anyway, so shouldn't be an issue for train services.
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,762
Service trains only use the up platform anyway, so shouldn't be an issue for train services.
And you can walk down the station approach road and under the bridge to access the old down platform area too, bit of a way around but possible.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,046
Location
Yorks
And you can walk down the station approach road and under the bridge to access the old down platform area too, bit of a way around but possible.

Indeed. The heritage side will still be able to operate as well.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,245
Location
West Wiltshire
Seems £13.5m has been awarded by the Government to a station near Okehampton, not on the currently closed section, but is likely to make Exeter line busier (but possibly act as railhead so discourage restoring missing section)

A new station on the Dartmoor Line​

The new railway station will be built on the Dartmoor Line that was the first line to be reinstated under the Department for Transport’s ‘Restoring your Railway’ fund. The new station will include:
  • step-free access to platforms
  • car parking with electric vehicle charging points
  • high quality cycle facilities
  • a new bus stop
The new station is located close to the A30 junction and will be in addition to Okehampton’s existing station on the West side of the town.

Connecting communities​

The new hub will level up the Okehampton region, connecting communities in the town. It will also connect the wider West Devon and North Cornwall areas with Exeter.

Find out more about the West Devon Transport Hub
Find out more about Levelling Up
Published 8 March 2024


 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,046
Location
Yorks
Seems £13.5m has been awarded by the Government to a station near Okehampton, not on the currently closed section, but is likely to make Exeter line busier (but possibly act as railhead so discourage restoring missing section)





By any logic, a successful new station should increase the case for the full line reinstatement (afterall, if more people want to travel in one direction, it makes sense that more will want to travel in the other), but those against reinstatement will twist any development to their agenda
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,218
By any logic, a successful new station should increase the case for the full line reinstatement (afterall, if more people want to travel in one direction, it makes sense that more will want to travel in the other), but those against reinstatement will twist any development to their agenda

Alternatively, those who want reinstatement (in defiance of logic) willtwist any development to their agenda.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,046
Location
Yorks
Alternatively, those who want reinstatement (in defiance of logic) willtwist any development to their agenda.

We will of course adapt circumstances to our argument.

It just so happens that its perfectly logical to want a decent, robust railway network in the South West of England.

Those who are against such a situation defy all logic.
 

uglymonkey

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2018
Messages
480
"Those who are against such a situation defy all logic." - And probably live a million miles away and only ever visit ( in the car) on rare holidays.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
2,769
We will of course adapt circumstances to our argument.

It just so happens that its perfectly logical to want a decent, robust railway network in the South West of England.

Those who are against such a situation defy all logic.
Nothing wrong with that. The sensible place to put it is where the people live. Which isn't between Okehampton and Tavistock
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,046
Location
Yorks
Nothing wrong with that. The sensible place to put it is where the people live. Which isn't between Okehampton and Tavistock

Lots of people live at Tavistock, lots live at Okehampton, lots live at Crediton.

Railways are supposed to run between places where people live.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,159
Lots of people live at Tavistock, lots live at Okehampton, lots live at Crediton.

Railways are supposed to run between places.
Having looked at the populations of those places your idea of what constitutes 'lots of people' and mine are very different.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,046
Location
Yorks
Having looked at the populations of those places your idea of what constitutes 'lots of people' and mine are very different.

Well, you say that, but Okehampton and Crediton seem to generate enough passengers !
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
2,769
Lots of people live at Tavistock, lots live at Okehampton, lots live at Crediton.

Railways are supposed to run between places where people live.
Absolutely: There are 360,000 people in South Devon, not including Plymouth and Exeter. That's the place for a railway
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
5,100
Absolutely: There are 360,000 people in South Devon, not including Plymouth and Exeter. That's the place for a railway
not at all, that's "the place" that shouldn't be without a railway. Presumably on that basis you think that the S&C should be closed?

When there is a string of smallish towns with economic hubs not far away (but the roads and rail links are not good enough for them to thrive) then a rail link is a good investment. Ever heard of levelling up? Remember the Robin Hood line? Have you heard about the Ivanhoe line?
 

uglymonkey

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2018
Messages
480
All roads ( and railway lines) lead to London, the rest - particularly England, ( no devolved assembly) can go hang.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,407
Location
Bristol
By any logic, a successful new station should increase the case for the full line reinstatement (afterall, if more people want to travel in one direction, it makes sense that more will want to travel in the other), but those against reinstatement will twist any development to their agenda
This is spurious logic. People want to travel to places where they have something to do There. There is no reason to suppose thar travel towards one destination will indicate increased demand to another.
Railways are supposed to run between places where people live.
Railways are supposed to run from where people live to where people want to go. That's rather a different thing.
Absolutely: There are 360,000 people in South Devon, not including Plymouth and Exeter. That's the place for a railway
Density matters in this, because the
train cannot stop at every lamppost to collect individuals and still remain a viable option for longer journeys.
When there is a string of smallish towns with economic hubs not far away (but the roads and rail links are not good enough for them to thrive) then a rail link is a good investment. Ever heard of levelling up? Remember the Robin Hood line? Have you heard about the Ivanhoe line?
Ivanhoe's not open though, if you're talking about the Coalville/Ashby section.
 

Gathursty

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
2,523
Location
Wigan
We really do need someone with a clipboard to go to Okehampton and ask residents how often they go to Tavistock and Plymouth and if it would increase if there was a direct rail link and the same question in Tavistock about Okehampton, Crediton and Exeter.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,046
Location
Yorks
This is spurious logic. People want to travel to places where they have something to do There. There is no reason to suppose thar travel towards one destination will indicate increased demand to another.

Railways are supposed to run from where people live to where people want to go. That's rather a different thing.

If you look at anywhere with a comprehensive railway network, you'll find that people travel in all directions by train. Kent, Sussex, Yorkshire. The 1960's obsession with turning everything into a dead end branch line really doesn't reflect the way people actually travel.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
2,769
not at all, that's "the place" that shouldn't be without a railway. Presumably on that basis you think that the S&C should be closed?

When there is a string of smallish towns with economic hubs not far away (but the roads and rail links are not good enough for them to thrive) then a rail link is a good investment. Ever heard of levelling up? Remember the Robin Hood line? Have you heard about the Ivanhoe line?
The Ivanhoe line? An existing freight railway between a major city and some substantial towns? Exactly what is the similarity between that and a line through the middle of nowhere?

Apart from neither actually existing
 

Top