• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Th 21/10/21 IET hits PW Trolley left on line near Challow

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,133
Location
Surrey
TOCs and NR have to ensure that, if granting VSS, there is no subsequent impact on safety or 'operational performance' (something like that). The roles can't be replaced so safety critical S&T / P-way roles eem unlikely to be impacted very heavily. That being said there is a risk if it is disproportionately older / more experiecned colleagues who take it up as well as the increasing desire to out-source track work to contractors.
Fair to bring that clarity to the process that sits behind granting VSS to an individual but as its primarily the older staff members that are likely to be applying you lose that experience albeit it does create opportunities for others in the organisation to progress which is no bad thing either. Just need to be careful not dilute individual areas too much though in my experience over 10 years of the annual BR reorganisations in the 1980s.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

SamYeager

Member
Joined
20 Mar 2014
Messages
339
TOCs and NR have to ensure that, if granting VSS, there is no subsequent impact on safety or 'operational performance' (something like that). The roles can't be replaced so safety critical S&T / P-way roles eem unlikely to be impacted very heavily. That being said there is a risk if it is disproportionately older / more experiecned colleagues who take it up as well as the increasing desire to out-source track work to contractors.
Realistically it's nearly always the older / more experienced people who are more likely to take voluntary redundancy so there is always going to be an impact on safety or 'operational performance' as you put it. If certain areas perceive that they are being deliberarately overlooked then it's more likely that some may start looking to join third parties as contractors or even just just say 'sod it' and retire instead.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,584
Location
London
Realistically it's nearly always the older / more experienced people who are more likely to take voluntary redundancy so there is always going to be an impact on safety or 'operational performance' as you put it. If certain areas perceive that they are being deliberarately overlooked then it's more likely that some may start looking to join third parties as contractors or even just just say 'sod it' and retire instead.

Let's not forget that older does not always equal better. Staff may have experience but some of it could be redundant. Either way, I'm sure NR are looking closely at who has put in for VSS and what consequences that may have.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,133
Location
Surrey
Let's not forget that older does not always equal better. Staff may have experience but some of it could be redundant. Either way, I'm sure NR are looking closely at who has put in for VSS and what consequences that may have.
Correct it plays both ways but on balance across the industry you lose that experience but as long as its managed the risks can be contained but as long as there not chasing some target of headcount reduction. The other good thing here is there hasn't been a VS scheme for many years so with that stability there has been the opportunity for that experience to be shared and passed down the teams so natural successors will be there.
 

alxndr

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2015
Messages
1,478
The RAIB is going to be investigating after all.

At 06:09 hrs on 21 October 2021, the 05:23 hrs Great Western Railway passenger service from London Paddington to Swansea struck an engineering trolley left on the line near Challow in Oxfordshire. The train was travelling at 123 mph (198 km/h) at the time of the collision.

The train came to a stand around 1.5 miles beyond the point of collision. There were no injuries among the passengers on board and the train did not derail. However, the handle of the trolley became wedged under the leading bogie of the train while the trolley itself caused some damage to the train’s underframe. The collision resulted in minor damage to the track, while the trolley appears to have been destroyed by the impact.

The train involved in the collision was the first train to pass through the area after the track was handed back following engineering work which had taken place during the previous night. RAIB’s preliminary examination found that the trolley had been inadvertently left on the railway line following this work, which had taken place within a possession.

Our investigation will seek to identify the sequence of events that led to the collision. It will also consider:
  • the processes in place for managing vehicles such as trolleys within possessions
  • the training, competence and management oversight of the staff involved and any factors that may have influenced their actions
  • any relevant underlying factors.
Our investigation will also consider a similar incident which took place at 05:55 hrs on 8 September 2021, when a passenger train travelling between Staines and London Waterloo struck an engineering trolley on the approach to Twickenham station. This trolley had also been left on the line following overnight engineering work. RAIB no longer intends to publish a separate safety digest concerning this incident.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,133
Location
Surrey
Good to see and their tying it in with the Staines incident that happened a few weeks before this one.

Our investigation will also consider a similar incident which took place at 05:55 hrs on 8 September 2021, when a passenger train travelling between Staines and London Waterloo struck an engineering trolley on the approach to Twickenham station. This trolley had also been left on the line following overnight engineering work. RAIB no longer intends to publish a separate safety digest concerning this incident.
 

alxndr

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2015
Messages
1,478
Thread reopened for @alxndr to provide an update. :)
Thanks Cowley.

Just wanted to update that the RAIB report has now been released:

A maintenance team had carried out overnight work at Challow and no one noticed the team had left its hand trolley on the track. The checks undertaken before handing back the railway for normal operation also had not identified the hand trolley’s presence. A process which formed part of these checks was the line clear verification process. It was used to monitor what vehicles, including hand trolleys, were placed on and taken off the track during the overnight work. However, there were weaknesses within this process, and these were compounded by the maintenance team not following the process as it was required to on the night concerned.

Underlying factors related to the weaknesses within the line clear verification process were:
  • It was reliant on human actions for its successful implementation, which the rail industry had recognised, but not yet implemented any measures to avoid or mitigate errors.
  • It was separate to the work planning process as defined by Network Rail’s company standards. This was a possible underlying factor.
  • Network Rail’s assurance activities had not detected that staff in the Swindon delivery unit welding and grinding section were not complying with the line clear verification process. This was a possible underlying factor.
A further probable underlying factor was that hand trolleys were being routinely used at night without displaying any red lights and that no assurance activities were taking place within work sites to monitor compliance to this requirement.

RAIB observed that after the accident, the train was allowed to travel at a speed above that which should have been permitted given the level of damage it had sustained. RAIB also observed that there were multiple issues with how the work at Challow was planned by Network Rail.

Recommendations​

RAIB has made five recommendations to Network Rail. The first is to establish how the existing line clear verification process can be improved while the second is to consider what technology could be used by its staff to support the process. The third recommendation is to propose an amendment to the Rule Book so that hand trolleys are required to display an illuminated red light in both directions at all times when on the track. The fourth is for Network Rail to have processes in place to ensure that any hand trolley placed on its track has illuminated red lights displayed in both directions. The fifth recommendation is to review the effectiveness of its safety assurance activities which check that hand trolleys are being used correctly and safely.

RAIB also identified three learning points. The first reminds maintenance staff about the importance of complying with all rules and standards concerning how trolleys and rail skates should be used on Network Rail’s infrastructure. The second highlights the importance of clear communication between the staff at a train involved in an accident and those based in control rooms to establish what damage has been sustained by a train, so that the appropriate controls can be put in place before the train is permitted to move. The third is that staff involved in planning maintenance work produce documents that are accurate, appropriate and specific for the task that is being carried out, and involve those responsible for the work in the planning of it.
 

Adoarable

Member
Joined
24 Jul 2020
Messages
59
Location
London
Thanks, an interesting read. Basically the track workers had a bit of a panic when they mislaid the keys to the van, and in the process of finding them forgot all about the hand trolley (even though the keys were eventually found on the hand trolley!).

The report also mentions a similar incident that happened at Twickenham. That one is much more shocking. The track workers there:
- did not sign in or get a briefing before going on the track;
- put hand trolleys on the track without getting permission;
- and deliberately left one on the track with the attitude of “somebody else will get it”!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top