Fair point...any team does well to put out a full strength team these days so well done to Australia for that.
+1
More importantly, Australia have a pretty good idea of who is in their First XI these days (with two possible exceptions) which not all teams have.
Chris Rogers is regarded as playing to keep his position in the side at the moment, and he wasn't helped in his preparation by having to skip the day/night round of the Sheffield Shield due to his colour blindness.
The other uncertainty is Mitchell Marsh, simply because it's a fair chance that his great start (205 runs at 41) will only go on for so long before the opposition teams work out a plan for him and he'll need a break from the top level to fine-tune his technique. It's a trend that's happened plenty of times in the past (think of Phil Hughes, carving up South Africa then struggling in England) and the present (Ben Stokes, 12 months on from being the team's best player in the Ashes he is now a liability for England) and will happen again in the future.
After the gloomy news yesterday re Michael Clarke's back I was surprised that he was able to restart his innings, so well done to him! I do wonder how long he can manage such a chronic condition, tho'.
He seemed to get better after each break through today, but he was still obviously in pain after certain shots later in the day. Alex Kontouris (the team physio) would have to be a fair candidate for man of the match if Australia win by any margin less than the 68 runs that Clarke made today and/or if Ryan Harris gets lots of wickets.
Cricket Australia know that he won't be around forever (his lower back is a degenerative condition) and they are starting to make plans. George Bailey is locked in as the stand-in captain for the ODI team, but the current option for Tests (where Bailey's batting isn't enough to keep a place in the side) is just to pass it on to Brad Haddin and will probably stay that way until Steve Smith is a couple of years more mature and ready for the top job.
The captaincy succession here is a bit more orderly than it has been in England (who are their own worst banana peels at times) mainly because there's a bit more culture around the vice-captain's position as a unique on-field leadership role (usually reserved for the wicketkeeper) that is distinct from being anointed as the next captain.
Maybe there's also a bit more stability from the role of the Test captaincy being a somewhat significant national relationship role ranking above the Prime Minister's job. Where the British people respect the PM but gleefully watch as the cricketers throw knives at their captain, here it's the opposite.
As a long standing England fan, I consider all other teams to be banana skins for them!
I won't say anything more on the subject other than that as a true Australian (i.e. my 'second team' is anyone playing England) I am very much looking forward to the World Cup match on February 23. After certain events in September this year it could be just like that T20I match a few years ago when everyone was expecting the USA to comfortably handle Afghanistan.